Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

And you know he’s not worried about his dog, right? He’s saying he’s glad there is a pitbull in the house to protect his daughter while she is staying in his home while he is away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

And you know he’s not worried about his dog, right? He’s saying he’s glad there is a pitbull in the house to protect his daughter while she is staying in his home while he is away.

Yes, it's endearing. But still kinda an odd thing to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

And you know he’s not worried about his dog, right? He’s saying he’s glad there is a pitbull in the house to protect his daughter while she is staying in his home while he is away.

Yes, it's endearing. But still kinda an odd thing to say.

Not really. He’s had hateful and harassing messages sent to his business and personal accounts. It’s not so far fetched to worry someone might show up at your house under those circumstances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the AH fans who claimed Johnny will never be in a blockbuster again or whatever -- Wall Street Journal reports his Dior cologne is selling out. His star power is through the roof; a blockbuster comeback is imminent.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1532520000245882880

Probably smells like alpaca a$$. Apropos since fangirls/boys heads are up Depp’s a$$.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

When someone treats concern about harassment as a joke, that tends to suggest they don't think the harassment itself is a problem. Anyone who thinks harassment is wrong would agree with that article rather than mock it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

When someone treats concern about harassment as a joke, that tends to suggest they don't think the harassment itself is a problem. Anyone who thinks harassment is wrong would agree with that article rather than mock it.

Your reading comprehension is questionable. But at least you're good at moralizing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

The comment posting the article was mocking him. It certainly was not empathizing with him for the the way he has been harassed by Depp fans over this trial.

When someone treats concern about harassment as a joke, that tends to suggest they don't think the harassment itself is a problem. Anyone who thinks harassment is wrong would agree with that article rather than mock it.

Your reading comprehension is questionable. But at least you're good at moralizing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

When someone treats concern about harassment as a joke, that tends to suggest they don't think the harassment itself is a problem. Anyone who thinks harassment is wrong would agree with that article rather than mock it.

Your reading comprehension is questionable. But at least you're good at moralizing!

So go ahead and say you agree with the article, that it's wrong to harass people, and that you disapprove of Depp fans who doing this to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

It’s not that hard to find hateful comments about him online. He has gotten threats. By continuing to degrade him and dismiss the message of the piece, you are only demonstrating how much you need to take it to heart.

Impressive virtue signaling, pp.

You think it’s okay to threaten and harass someone because they were retained as an expert witness for a lawsuit? What is wrong with you? The lack of common decency is dismaying to say the least.

Nobody think it's ok to harass someone and you know it. What are you angry about?

When someone treats concern about harassment as a joke, that tends to suggest they don't think the harassment itself is a problem. Anyone who thinks harassment is wrong would agree with that article rather than mock it.

Your reading comprehension is questionable. But at least you're good at moralizing!

So go ahead and say you agree with the article, that it's wrong to harass people, and that you disapprove of Depp fans who doing this to him.

DP. That sure scared off pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

I feel very bad for him and agree with what he says in the article. JD should put forth a statement to his fans that says don’t attack AH or any of the people in the trial. Why would he not, unless he was encouraging it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Gal Gadot stopped following AH on Insta.

And yuck.
What a spineless twOt. No sisterhood. There isn’t a sisterhood. If you are abused by your partner you albetter be prepared for a lonely road. Feel deeply for Amber.

Forget about sisterhood - does Amber have any friends?
The unfollowing happened on the day when Amber was trying to convince everyone how she's on the same career level as Gal Gadot or Zendaya.

I don't blame Gal Gadot at all. The arrogance of comparing Amber to other actors was uncomfortable to watch! The Hollywood expert, Richard Marks was great at putting it in proper perspective!! He made it clear Amber was not in the same category.

Omg, that man was so awesome!

He was fascinating to listen to with all his experience, the first time and on rebuttal! He didn't hesitate, so didn't get interrupted by the lawyers. I have to go back and watch his time on the stand and a few others. So much great information!!

You mean Richard Marks, the Dealmaker? The Man Who Makes Deals? How many times did he say that? He should have included his phone number like a TV ad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm going to Sephora to check out Savage, I vaguely remember it being pretty delicious.

It was a trashy and racist ad campaign, so not surprising Dior didn’t drop him.

BTW, it’s Sauvage, not Savage, but that’s a common mistake given how the racist ad campaign played on the similarities between the words.

What??