“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

Source?

Aunt Ether on facebook who heard it from her online friend Leroy who heard it from Mable whose grand daughter has short hair and acts all liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

You’re a forced birther who exclusively reads right wing propaganda. No one cares what little made up tidbits you try to get people excited about. You have had literally nothing to say about decades of actual violence by the forced birthers. I’m sorry no one’s getting too excited about some red paint.

Hope you are enjoying your membership to JR.

Still no source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile…

Forced birthers are fascists. I’ll point out that one of the top threads on the first page of the politics forum is a Democrat-bashing thread even as the GOP attacks the First Amendment and clearly wants some Handmaid’s Tale/Man in the High Tower-esque world.

Meanwhile here on this thread we’ve got forced birther dum dums who can’t articulate an argument for their dumb positions and wants to complain about things that haven’t happened that their forced birther propaganda is telling them will happen.

[Anonymous]

Thanks in advance — Can someone hook it up with a straight shooting tl;dr of the situation:

- is it going to be overturned or not?
- do drafts generally become law?
- can all the protesting in the wake of the leak change the outcome?
- when will it be decided?
- do they know how it leaked yet?


Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks in advance — Can someone hook it up with a straight shooting tl;dr of the situation:

- is it going to be overturned or not? Nobody knows yet, but probably.
- do drafts generally become law? The Supreme Court doesn’t write law (yet! Give them time!), but it will allow laws to be effective and others not to be
- can all the protesting in the wake of the leak change the outcome? No, but voting Democratic from now until the GOP regains sanity (so forever) can.
- when will it be decided? Probably by the 30th. It has been decided I think, they just haven’t released it.
- do they know how it leaked yet? A conservative. The notes that leaked along with it came from a conservative justice; a liberal justice or a liberal clerk wouldn’t have access to those.


Thanks.

Not an expert but I’ve read a bit about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks in advance — Can someone hook it up with a straight shooting tl;dr of the situation:

- is it going to be overturned or not?
- do drafts generally become law?
- can all the protesting in the wake of the leak change the outcome?
- when will it be decided?
- do they know how it leaked yet?


Thanks.

I think it was a joint leak by Alito and Thomas

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks in advance — Can someone hook it up with a straight shooting tl;dr of the situation:

- is it going to be overturned or not?
- do drafts generally become law?
- can all the protesting in the wake of the leak change the outcome?
- when will it be decided?
- do they know how it leaked yet?


Thanks.

I think it was a joint leak by Alito and Thomas

Don't worry, Robert's people are on it. Any day now they'll catch the culprit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if the SCOTUS ruling comes out, there may be enough challenges to abortion bans that will prevent states from enacting such laws. This is from Florida where a synagogue says that in addition to violating privacy rights, the abortion ban is also a violation of the 1A religion clause.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/fl-ne-nsf-south-florida-jewish-congregation-challenges-abortion-law-20220614-t3n53g67cffzjhc25z6hklq6sq-story.html

The article only cites violation of religious freedom rights of Jewish women. But it seems that there would be an equal, if not more extreme, direct violation of religious freedom rights for Jewish doctors.

Abortion is not a Jewish tenet or common practice like circumcision and is not required to practice the religion. There is a difference between stating when they believe life begins and facilitating abortions. Furthermore Maimonides is a scholar but not a religious figure.

DP. The point is that the ruling does not allow exceptions for the health of the mother. In Judaism, the life of the mother takes priority over the life of the fetus because it is not yet living until birth. The absolute definition of life prior to birth and giving the fetus more right to life than the mother is a violation of the Jewish religion. The mother's right to a medical procedure that will preserve her life should be protected by the first amendment. So with no protection for the life of the mother, the Florida law is unconstitutional and should be overturned.

But the Dirty Six are Roman Catholic who believe that the life of babies trump the life of the mother because they are born without original sin. It is immaterial to these zealots that there are children at home who will now have no mother. The longer I live the more I am disgusted by organized religion and convinced it exists only to harm women

I'm fine with religion, I'm just disgusted by conservative Catholics and evangelicals and conservatives of any religion who want to subvert the division of church and state.

I hope conservatives do adopt all the unwanted children and rape babies. See how it goes.

There are 400,000 kids in foster care that “conservatives” are free to adopt now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile…

Forced birthers are fascists. I’ll point out that one of the top threads on the first page of the politics forum is a Democrat-bashing thread even as the GOP attacks the First Amendment and clearly wants some Handmaid’s Tale/Man in the High Tower-esque world.

Meanwhile here on this thread we’ve got forced birther dum dums who can’t articulate an argument for their dumb positions and wants to complain about things that haven’t happened that their forced birther propaganda is telling them will happen.

Or they are just people who disagree with you on a matter of principle.

You must be fun at parties.

[Anonymous]

Since it got buried 100 plus pages ago, I’ll ask again. So what happens when there is no ruling, will people here feel foolish for the hysterics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since it got buried 100 plus pages ago, I’ll ask again. So what happens when there is no ruling, will people here feel foolish for the hysterics?

It’s a stupid question. They took the case and held oral arguments, of course there will be a ruling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

Source?

Aunt Ether on facebook who heard it from her online friend Leroy who heard it from Mable whose grand daughter has short hair and acts all liberal.

Yahoo, Cletus:

https://news.yahoo.com/jane-revenge-group-appears-threaten-204241874.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

You’re a forced birther who exclusively reads right wing propaganda. No one cares what little made up tidbits you try to get people excited about. You have had literally nothing to say about decades of actual violence by the forced birthers. I’m sorry no one’s getting too excited about some red paint.

Hope you are enjoying your membership to JR.

Still no source?

Just posted one. I’m a conservative so I have actual work to do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since it got buried 100 plus pages ago, I’ll ask again. So what happens when there is no ruling, will people here feel foolish for the hysterics?

When there is no ruling overturning Roe; all the wasted time these people have been spending will be shocking.

Of course it was a liberal justice or clerk that leaked this; the idea that there is no way it could have been was stated by someone who has no clue of the inner workings of the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile…

Forced birthers are fascists. I’ll point out that one of the top threads on the first page of the politics forum is a Democrat-bashing thread even as the GOP attacks the First Amendment and clearly wants some Handmaid’s Tale/Man in the High Tower-esque world.

Meanwhile here on this thread we’ve got forced birther dum dums who can’t articulate an argument for their dumb positions and wants to complain about things that haven’t happened that their forced birther propaganda is telling them will happen.

Or they are just people who disagree with you on a matter of principle.

You must be fun at parties.

They are free to disagree according their own religious and moral principles within their own body. Forcing other people to live by their religious principles violates everything the country stands for.