“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

You’re a forced birther who exclusively reads right wing propaganda. No one cares what little made up tidbits you try to get people excited about. You have had literally nothing to say about decades of actual violence by the forced birthers. I’m sorry no one’s getting too excited about some red paint.

Hope you are enjoying your membership to JR.

Still no source?

Just posted one. I’m a conservative so I have actual work to do

Yes, I’m sure it was a lot of work for you to locate a non-extremist source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since it got buried 100 plus pages ago, I’ll ask again. So what happens when there is no ruling, will people here feel foolish for the hysterics?

When there is no ruling overturning Roe; all the wasted time these people have been spending will be shocking.

Of course it was a liberal justice or clerk that leaked this; the idea that there is no way it could have been was stated by someone who has no clue of the inner workings of the court.

Actually, time won't have been wasted at all. The justices will have realized the US has moved on.

I doubt a liberal leaked this though, it really smacks of a conservative who wants to force the courts hand.

[Anonymous]

It was Ginni all along

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was Ginni all along

I’d like proof, but what we now know of her activities around overthrowing the government speaks of a woman who wants to destroy democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was Ginni all along

I’d like proof, but what we now know of her activities around overthrowing the government speaks of a woman who wants to destroy democracy.

What activities exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was Ginni all along

I’d like proof, but what we now know of her activities around overthrowing the government speaks of a woman who wants to destroy democracy.

What activities exactly?

There’s a whole huge thread on Ginni if you’re actually curious. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1031076.page But you’re probably just playing dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was Ginni all along

I’d like proof, but what we now know of her activities around overthrowing the government speaks of a woman who wants to destroy democracy.

What activities exactly?

There’s a whole huge thread on Ginni if you’re actually curious. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1031076.page But you’re probably just playing dumb.

Yes an entire thread of conjecture and inuendo that proves nothing about Ginni Thomas. Again what provable activities exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

You’re a forced birther who exclusively reads right wing propaganda. No one cares what little made up tidbits you try to get people excited about. You have had literally nothing to say about decades of actual violence by the forced birthers. I’m sorry no one’s getting too excited about some red paint.

Hope you are enjoying your membership to JR.

Still no source?

Just posted one. I’m a conservative so I have actual work to do

Yes, I’m sure it was a lot of work for you to locate a non-extremist source.

Top of a quick search actually. I’m sorry this group is violent. It must be disturbing for you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was Ginni all along

I’d like proof, but what we now know of her activities around overthrowing the government speaks of a woman who wants to destroy democracy.

What activities exactly?

There’s a whole huge thread on Ginni if you’re actually curious. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1031076.page But you’re probably just playing dumb.

Yes an entire thread of conjecture and inuendo that proves nothing about Ginni Thomas. Again what provable activities exactly?

You read that whole thread and all the links in it that fast?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

Source?

Aunt Ether on facebook who heard it from her online friend Leroy who heard it from Mable whose grand daughter has short hair and acts all liberal.

Yahoo, Cletus:

https://news.yahoo.com/jane-revenge-group-appears-threaten-204241874.html

Sounds like more right wing provocateurs to me, just like the confirmed causes of violence at the George Floyd protests.

Oh hey look your own source agrees with me. “Some have expressed skepticism that the group is in fact a left-wing militant organisation and postulated that it may instead be a right-wing organisation maneuvering to turn people against the group’s goal of abortion rights for all.”

Remind me again which side - forced birth or pro choice - has spent decades committing violence in the name of their cause? The issue that people have brought up a dozen times and you forced birthers have ignored, including fire bombing? Oh that’s right. Forced birthers have been committing violence for decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

Source?

Aunt Ether on facebook who heard it from her online friend Leroy who heard it from Mable whose grand daughter has short hair and acts all liberal.

Yahoo, Cletus:

https://news.yahoo.com/jane-revenge-group-appears-threaten-204241874.html

Sounds like more right wing provocateurs to me, just like the confirmed causes of violence at the George Floyd protests.

Oh hey look your own source agrees with me. “Some have expressed skepticism that the group is in fact a left-wing militant organisation and postulated that it may instead be a right-wing organisation maneuvering to turn people against the group’s goal of abortion rights for all.”

Remind me again which side - forced birth or pro choice - has spent decades committing violence in the name of their cause? The issue that people have brought up a dozen times and you forced birthers have ignored, including fire bombing? Oh that’s right. Forced birthers have been committing violence for decades.

Whatever you think is fine with me. Truth comes out in the end, like it did with Avenatti et al

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane's Revenge is planning a large, violent event. Should be interesting times.

Source?

Aunt Ether on facebook who heard it from her online friend Leroy who heard it from Mable whose grand daughter has short hair and acts all liberal.

Yahoo, Cletus:

https://news.yahoo.com/jane-revenge-group-appears-threaten-204241874.html

Sounds like more right wing provocateurs to me, just like the confirmed causes of violence at the George Floyd protests.

Oh hey look your own source agrees with me. “Some have expressed skepticism that the group is in fact a left-wing militant organisation and postulated that it may instead be a right-wing organisation maneuvering to turn people against the group’s goal of abortion rights for all.”

Remind me again which side - forced birth or pro choice - has spent decades committing violence in the name of their cause? The issue that people have brought up a dozen times and you forced birthers have ignored, including fire bombing? Oh that’s right. Forced birthers have been committing violence for decades.

Whatever you think is fine with me. Truth comes out in the end, like it did with Avenatti et al

Sometimes it does. And sometimes the “rat snuggling” Republicans just keep using the same playbook over and over and over.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if the SCOTUS ruling comes out, there may be enough challenges to abortion bans that will prevent states from enacting such laws. This is from Florida where a synagogue says that in addition to violating privacy rights, the abortion ban is also a violation of the 1A religion clause.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/fl-ne-nsf-south-florida-jewish-congregation-challenges-abortion-law-20220614-t3n53g67cffzjhc25z6hklq6sq-story.html

The article only cites violation of religious freedom rights of Jewish women. But it seems that there would be an equal, if not more extreme, direct violation of religious freedom rights for Jewish doctors.

Abortion is not a Jewish tenet or common practice like circumcision and is not required to practice the religion. There is a difference between stating when they believe life begins and facilitating abortions. Furthermore Maimonides is a scholar but not a religious figure.

DP. The point is that the ruling does not allow exceptions for the health of the mother. In Judaism, the life of the mother takes priority over the life of the fetus because it is not yet living until birth. The absolute definition of life prior to birth and giving the fetus more right to life than the mother is a violation of the Jewish religion. The mother's right to a medical procedure that will preserve her life should be protected by the first amendment. So with no protection for the life of the mother, the Florida law is unconstitutional and should be overturned.

But the Dirty Six are Roman Catholic who believe that the life of babies trump the life of the mother because they are born without original sin. It is immaterial to these zealots that there are children at home who will now have no mother. The longer I live the more I am disgusted by organized religion and convinced it exists only to harm women

I'm fine with religion, I'm just disgusted by conservative Catholics and evangelicals and conservatives of any religion who want to subvert the division of church and state.

I hope conservatives do adopt all the unwanted children and rape babies. See how it goes.

There are 400,000 kids in foster care that “conservatives” are free to adopt now.

They have been born and they are only interested in the unborn. I think ACB should have to adopt all 400,000.

[Anonymous]

Opinion is out.