Prince Philip has died...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

It was obviously heartfelt rather than rehearsed. It was lovely.

I think Charles will be a stabilizing head of the BRF, and William’s family will provide the more youthful connection that seems to resonate with people (family, fashion, and personal appearances).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

Anne was better - also grieving and wearing proper mourning black.

We’re ranking the grieving children now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

Anne was better - also grieving and wearing proper mourning black.

We’re ranking the grieving children now?

I mean - isn't that what the royal family's for?

Charles is well-known to have been a horrible father in his own kid's childhood and didn't get along with Phillip (who thought he was weak) in his own youth. Its weird to me how families will butt heads for decades but when one dies the waterworks come out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

It was obviously heartfelt rather than rehearsed. It was lovely.

I think Charles will be a stabilizing head of the BRF, and William’s family will provide the more youthful connection that seems to resonate with people (family, fashion, and personal appearances).

Nah...the Commonwealth Nations will fight to abolish the monarchy when Elizabeth's reign in over. We like the Queen...she is like our benevolent grandmother but we don't want Charles or William.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

Anne was better - also grieving and wearing proper mourning black.

Anne was not better.

And, Charles always looks classy. There are no hard and fast rules when it comes to grief and attire...especially when you are the future King.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

Anne was better - also grieving and wearing proper mourning black.

We’re ranking the grieving children now?

I mean - isn't that what the royal family's for?

Charles is well-known to have been a horrible father in his own kid's childhood and didn't get along with Phillip (who thought he was weak) in his own youth. Its weird to me how families will butt heads for decades but when one dies the waterworks come out.

That is actually not true - at all. He was not a horrible father at all. I don’t have the time to get into it with you but one of the best examples of the way in which the media portrayed Charles as a father was that iconic video of Diana running to hug her sons after they got back from a Royal Tour. The video no one ever showed? The moment after when Charles went in for the hug as well.

And what kind of monster are you? There’s a difference between butting heads and not caring when one dies, Jesus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

It was obviously heartfelt rather than rehearsed. It was lovely.

I think Charles will be a stabilizing head of the BRF, and William’s family will provide the more youthful connection that seems to resonate with people (family, fashion, and personal appearances).

Nah...the Commonwealth Nations will fight to abolish the monarchy when Elizabeth's reign in over. We like the Queen...she is like our benevolent grandmother but we don't want Charles or William.

UK resident here (again). Not happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

It was obviously heartfelt rather than rehearsed. It was lovely.

I think Charles will be a stabilizing head of the BRF, and William’s family will provide the more youthful connection that seems to resonate with people (family, fashion, and personal appearances).

Nah...the Commonwealth Nations will fight to abolish the monarchy when Elizabeth's reign in over. We like the Queen...she is like our benevolent grandmother but we don't want Charles or William.

UK resident here (again). Not happening.

DP - you need to be worried about Ireland.

As for the Commonwealth -

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

Anne was better - also grieving and wearing proper mourning black.

We’re ranking the grieving children now?

Of course!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles speaks - he always sounds like he's straining for words

Really? I find him to be one of the most eloquent members of the family. For a son who is grieving, I found this very well-done and moving.

It was obviously heartfelt rather than rehearsed. It was lovely.

I think Charles will be a stabilizing head of the BRF, and William’s family will provide the more youthful connection that seems to resonate with people (family, fashion, and personal appearances).

Nah...the Commonwealth Nations will fight to abolish the monarchy when Elizabeth's reign in over. We like the Queen...she is like our benevolent grandmother but we don't want Charles or William.

UK resident here (again). Not happening.

DP - you need to be worried about Ireland.

As for the Commonwealth -

1. Northern Ireland has always been a mess.

2. CBS is on Team H*M...and Gayle’s gal pal is literally in bed with them financially and stands to benefit from any media coverage that keeps them in the news.

3. The UK will be fine if commonwealth countries pull out. Many of the commonwealth countries are only relevant because of their link to the UK. Doubtful they will bail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Died on 9th, at 9am, 99th day of the year, at the age of 99.

On the wedding anniversary of Charles. The combined ages of his two wives (Diana and Camilla) is 99 yrs.

Umm okay that is weird. Like weird weird.

Anyone want to tell us the significance of the number 9?

phonetically ... NO in German.


When the angel of death came .. this is what he heard,,,,, no no no no no...

but in German,,

Nein.. Nein.. Nein..Nein...!

maybe,, it was not his time after all, hence the number code.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of weird how gross people on Twitter are. Also, why are people calling him a Nazi? He literally fought in WWII against the Nazis!

So many idiots on Twitter. Ignore Ignore Ignore.

He lived in Nazi Germany with his sister who was a Nazi and named her child Adolf

He was sent to live with his sister in Germany when he was a child. He had no choice in the matter - his mom was in an asylum and his dad abandoned him to live as a playboy in the South of France.

He went to a boarding school in Germany run by a Jewish headmaster. When the headmaster was forced to flee by the Nazis to Scotland, Philip followed the headmaster to the Scottish school.

Philip then fought in the war against the Nazis/Axis powers on the European seas.

Anyone calling him a Nazi because of his older sisters' decisions are idiots. The guy literally battled the Nazis in WW2. Lots of aristocratic families sullied their names by supporting - explicitly or tacitly - the Nazis. There's no indication Philip was a stooge for the Nazis.

I agree.

Not to mention the fact that his sisters were 7 and 16 years older than him.

And he wasn't close to them - he has already been living in England, being raised by the Mountbattens, for several years, when his sister got married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of weird how gross people on Twitter are. Also, why are people calling him a Nazi? He literally fought in WWII against the Nazis!

So many idiots on Twitter. Ignore Ignore Ignore.

He lived in Nazi Germany with his sister who was a Nazi and named her child Adolf

He was sent to live with his sister in Germany when he was a child. He had no choice in the matter - his mom was in an asylum and his dad abandoned him to live as a playboy in the South of France.

He went to a boarding school in Germany run by a Jewish headmaster. When the headmaster was forced to flee by the Nazis to Scotland, Philip followed the headmaster to the Scottish school.

Philip then fought in the war against the Nazis/Axis powers on the European seas.

Anyone calling him a Nazi because of his older sisters' decisions are idiots. The guy literally battled the Nazis in WW2. Lots of aristocratic families sullied their names by supporting - explicitly or tacitly - the Nazis. There's no indication Philip was a stooge for the Nazis.

I agree.

Not to mention the fact that his sisters were 7 and 16 years older than him.

And he wasn't close to them - he has already been living in England, being raised by the Mountbattens, for several years, when his sister got married.

(sisters)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Died on 9th, at 9am, 99th day of the year, at the age of 99.

On the wedding anniversary of Charles. The combined ages of his two wives (Diana and Camilla) is 99 yrs.

Umm okay that is weird. Like weird weird.

Anyone want to tell us the significance of the number 9?

phonetically ... NO in German.


When the angel of death came .. this is what he heard,,,,, no no no no no...

but in German,,

Nein.. Nein.. Nein..Nein...!

maybe,, it was not his time after all, hence the number code.

It would be even more puzzling if he died at 9:09..

It would be,, NO..O! NO!...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you!

Do be careful to look for it in your time zone. It is not 3PM in the U.S.