DMV Preseason Rankings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2004/U16 are mostly rising sophomores and need to get the attention and on the lists of college coaches. 2003/U17 are mostly rising juniors, are reaching out to college coaches right now, and if they’re going DI or competitive DIII will be verbally committed within the year, some stragglers early next year. rankings for U18 or for U15 and below just don’t matter. Being on a team that can get you in front of college coaches, whether through connections or showcasing, during sophomore and junior years is what matters for girls who want to play in college. For everyone else, play where it’s fun and makes sense for your family.

Oh. We will stop then.

[Anonymous]

So did we conclude that VDA is the best, followed closely by McLean and BRYC after the stellar showings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So did we conclude that VDA is the best, followed closely by McLean and BRYC after the stellar showings?

It has been established that across all age groups and across time and space that Pipeline is the best, period.....

[Anonymous]

ahh...ok. Guess everyone needs to commute to Baltimore now for their kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ahh...ok. Guess everyone needs to commute to Baltimore now for their kid.

Pipeline and FCV are superior to all. Can’t you read?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"FIND A NEW CLUB"

They did AND they are allowed to express their opinion (s)

You dont like it? "FIND A NEW FORUM".

Do you need a tissue?

No, but unless your kid is a unquestioned top five starter you should be more aware of these practices because the next team FCV absorbs could have a player who sends your kid to the bench or worse.

Just remember, there is always someone better than your kid.

I still don't get this arguement. Every single team has starters and bench players. EVERY. SINGLE. TEAM. If every bench player left their team, there would only be 11 person rosters. Don't get the argument.

Leaving and being pushed out are two different things.

Being a starter and being pushed to the bench in favor of the new recruit is different.

Just remember that FCV is always looking for a kid better than your kid.

Just a fact. No argument for or against the practice because it is how teams do get better. I just love the parent arrogance at FCV who believe their kid is untouchable because they are at FCV.

Well, with all the options available to players now the typical churn at FCV will be less because they aren’t the only game in town. Another reason that the arrogance is even more ridiculous now than ever before.

You can commence dropping FCV from your vocabulary. St James is starting to make more and more decisions - who doesn't love new Unis when you bought new ones last year! The churn will be in the other direction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"FIND A NEW CLUB"

They did AND they are allowed to express their opinion (s)

You dont like it? "FIND A NEW FORUM".

Do you need a tissue?

No, but unless your kid is a unquestioned top five starter you should be more aware of these practices because the next team FCV absorbs could have a player who sends your kid to the bench or worse.

Just remember, there is always someone better than your kid.

I still don't get this arguement. Every single team has starters and bench players. EVERY. SINGLE. TEAM. If every bench player left their team, there would only be 11 person rosters. Don't get the argument.

Leaving and being pushed out are two different things.

Being a starter and being pushed to the bench in favor of the new recruit is different.

Just remember that FCV is always looking for a kid better than your kid.

Just a fact. No argument for or against the practice because it is how teams do get better. I just love the parent arrogance at FCV who believe their kid is untouchable because they are at FCV.

Well, with all the options available to players now the typical churn at FCV will be less because they aren’t the only game in town. Another reason that the arrogance is even more ridiculous now than ever before.

You can commence dropping FCV from your vocabulary. St James is starting to make more and more decisions - who doesn't love new Unis when you bought new ones last year! The churn will be in the other direction.

Are they changing the uniforms already?

[Anonymous]

Why wouldn't they change uniforms? They need to change the logos.

[Anonymous]

FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

Nothing is free. They will just find another way to stick it to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

LOL free!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

You still don't understand do you? You are all now members of a gym. The only "free" thing you will get is towels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

You still don't understand do you? You are all now members of a gym. The only "free" thing you will get is towels.

Wait for a couple years and get back to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

No they will not be free

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCV parent...if they change the uniforms, they'll be free.

Just FYI for all you FCV Debbie Downers.

No they will not be free

If you think a few hundred kids are going to get gifted uniforms, you're kidding yourself...unless its free with a lifetime gym membership.