It's not about right and wrong lol. It is about approaching it in the way one feels comfortable. If one wants to stay home and mask at all times, go for it. But let us do as we please. We have suffered enough wearing masks that do nothing. If you are vulnerable, wear your professionally fitted N95. That is the only thing that will work. |
It’s called inference—-please read up on it. Not going to play your silly games, so do your own research. Better yet, post an article that proves it didn’t happen. |
It didn’t happen, if it did, the news outlets would have been a foamy-mouthed frenzy. But, if you want to “do the right thing” at sit at home in your N95, you should do just that. |
But how do you define right in this situation? We’re talking about how best to manage risk. That’s not an either/or. It’s a spectrum. I know a lot of people who think we should be taking a very conservative approach “until it’s over”. Masking in indoor places even when case rates are very low, vaccine mandates, limit group sizes, mask all kids, limit certain indoor activities. I respect that this how they feel and I’m not saying they are “wrong” — it’s true that these things will all help you avoid Covid, and I get that some people are especially concerned about long Covid. But while everyone I know like this will say they are at least partially motivated by wanting to protect more vulnerable people, they aren’t members of this more vulnerable group. They are relatively young, vaccinated, no immune deficiencies. Some might be mildly overweight or have asthma or a complicating factor that would make them slightly more vulnerable. Some have kids under 5 who they will argue are uniquely vulnerable because they can’t vaccinate. But I have a kid under 5, and everything I read about Covid rates in young kids places it as slightly more concerning than other common preschool viruses (because it’s novel) but less threatening than the possibility of her getting hit by a car by crap drivers (4 young kids in our area have been hit in the last year, and one killed). I don’t want her to get Covid and we take precautions, but if she got it she has a better than 99% chance of recovering fine. I don’t lose sleep over this. I have a close friend whose DD has RSV at this age and developed a long term lung issue. It sucks, but since I was aware of that before Covid even existed, it lives in the category of stuff I can’t perfectly control. I accept it. And everyone I know who is uniquely vulnerable to Covid has a less cautious approach to Covid than the group above. Friend who’s kid has lung capacity issues from RSV? That DD wears a K94 to school but the others don’t, they test frequently but they travel and go out to eat and socialize normally with friends. Another friend on lifelong immunosuppressants (organ recipient) masks at the grocery store but doesn’t care if others do, was a huge advocate for in person school during closures. Family member with heart disease (multiple bypass surgeries) won’t wear medical grade masks because they are uncomfortable, and travels because he doesn’t want to waste time. Another family member whose spouse died of Covid feels the same about travel and eating out — time is short, risks are worth it. The people advocating for the most cautious approach are not automatically right. They don’t speak for all vulnerable people, or even most vulnerable people. Outside places like DC, there are lots of liberal, science-believing people who think we need a balanced approach to Covid, that we need to accept some risk in favor of doing right by our kids, enjoying life, and caring for our mental health. Your 90 year old dad is not wrong. He has different priorities than you. He is assessing risk in a different way. |
It is about responsible and irresponsible. |
Inference? I think the word you are looking for is fabrication. You can't infer anything from a single data point. |
NP. That’s…not how this works. If you claim something, YOU back it up with actual data. It’s not up to PP to prove a negative. |
Sorry, not participating in your moronic charade. If you were too lazy to keep up with current events as they unfolded, it’s not my problem. Now excuse me, I have much better ways to spend my time. |
In other words, she tried to find evidence that supported her claims but failed, since it never happened. |
Lol. Like spamming DCUM at 4 in the morning? Put up or shut up. The only moronic charade here is yours. |
What a classic “I failed” response. |
And she’s probably celebrating at her keyboard thinking she’s so above all of us, and she’s the only one who GETS IT, when in reality she’s clueless and makes herself look worse with every post. |
Nah, she knows she badly lost this exchange. The “I’m not participating…”, “I have better ways to spend my time…” are classic ‘pull the escape cord’ lines. |
Its kinda sad that you don't feel any kind of community responsibility. You are traveling, attending activities unmasked and then going into school, which puts us all at risk. |
What risk? Look at hospitals- they’re fine. Get the vaccine/booster, and go on your way. No one cares anymore. The pandemic is as good as done. |