Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the alleged shooter is chairman of the MAGA committee in St. George, Utah.



What?

DP - I couldn't find anything on that but it looks like he donated to Trump in 2020.

apparently different person with the same name who is 10 years older

[Anonymous]

There's a photo of Tyler wearing a mask outdoors. That's not MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

Don’t feed the crazy RWNJ troll.

All of you are jumping on this poster not realizing they are argeeing with you- they're talking about what the new rw talking point IS, not agreeing with it.

+1

They're describing how the far right is reacting to the realization that the shooter wasn't a leftist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oof I would not want to be Fuentes right now:

High profile right wingers on X bicker like this constantly. I wouldn't read into it.

That said, I find it totally plausible that the shooter probably aligns politically with Fuentes. I just don't believe that he was so riled up by anything Fuentes said that it motivated the killing.

Listen to the full clip of August 2025. He literally directed his followers to harass Kirk at Kirk's college tour events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's a photo of Tyler wearing a mask outdoors. That's not MAGA.

Don't hurt yourself with that reach now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's a photo of Tyler wearing a mask outdoors. That's not MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he so far left that he's right or is he so far right that he's left?

https://www.wvxu.org/politics/2015-07-09/studies-link-political-ideology-with-self-control

He is so far right that he is on the right. There is no "left" here.

Where is your source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

So open game on the center and married religious people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Not new. The term has been around for years. It goes back to at least Trump's first term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter is a punk
Its so messed up his family didn't call the FBI or police a family friend did. Now they're trying to act like they helped turn him in bs you would have been on the phone the first hour not two days later. F his family too who say he was spewing hate at the dinner table before he murdered charlie kirk.

Oh pipe down, crazy. The family friend was reportedly their minister. They are Mormon. Makes complete sense that they would seek counsel and prayer from clergy. My guess is the father KNEW his minister was going to report this and was likely part of reason that the father went to him. And I really think everyone who keeps attributing the "spewing hate" comment to Tyler Robinson needs to take a pause. I'm pretty positive the "spewing hate" reference that everyone keeps repeating was Robinson saying that he disliked Kirk because KIRK spews hate and was hate-filled.

Robinson didn't even saying that. It was a family member. It's being misreported by people desperately trying to paint Robinson as left wing.

That was almost certainly Governor Cox misspeaking, trying to say what the family member said that Tyler said. The other interpretation doesn't make sense.

Why doesn't it make sense? Read the sentence before. Both Tyler Robinson and the family member expressed dislike for Kirk.

Whys they dislike Kirk?

What kind of dislike?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the alleged shooter is chairman of the MAGA committee in St. George, Utah.



The old folks retirement city St. George?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

There's no "new talking point" - it's just you idiots with your same old bogus talking point of "blame everything on the left" even when all indications now are that the shooter was alt-right. When your stale talking point doesn't comport with reality you complain and accuse others of changing the narrative, when in fact it was yours that was wrong all along.

+1

DCUM is the original realtime BS creator

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

It's 2025, that's not how news works anymore. There are primary sources floating around and the news will take a while to confirm it. If there were pictures of him at an ANTIFA rally I'm sure you would be happy to cite those as evidence enough of his leanings. This is the type of hypocritical cognitive dissonance that defines right wing idiocy.