Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oof I would not want to be Fuentes right now:

High profile right wingers on X bicker like this constantly. I wouldn't read into it.

That said, I find it totally plausible that the shooter probably aligns politically with Fuentes. I just don't believe that he was so riled up by anything Fuentes said that it motivated the killing.

How these people full of hate called themselves Christians?

Being Christian only means believing that Jesus took the fall for all your sins. It's up to you what you do with that freedom. Some people are overcome with with gratitude and dedicate their lives to walking His path. Others say "thanks, patsy!" and rejoice that they are enot accountable to anyone on Earth or beyond, and (like Charlie Kirk) preach that "empathy does a lot of damage"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212
https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the alleged shooter is chairman of the MAGA committee in St. George, Utah.



What?

DP - I couldn't find anything on that but it looks like he donated to Trump in 2020.

Dude that tax return and address is a different Tyler robinson. There’s 50+ of them in the country and they’re all getting harassed

[Anonymous]

He was an unhinged leftist and the people who are trying to paint him as a right winger should be ashamed. The only way to lower the temperature of our political climate is to have honest conversations about what is happening. People are becoming increasingly radicalized and justifying the use of violence. Something like this should have never happened and we need to make sure it doesn’t happen in the future. If your kid has a sudden interest in left wing politics then you need to view it as a red flag. Make sure they don’t have access to weapons and suggest that they go to therapy or start exercising.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

It’s not new, you’re just too old to know what young people are up to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Not new. The term has been around for years. It goes back to at least Trump's first term.

Pls define groyper?
Did it go full circle like woke did?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the alleged shooter is chairman of the MAGA committee in St. George, Utah.



What?

DP - I couldn't find anything on that but it looks like he donated to Trump in 2020.

Dude that tax return and address is a different Tyler robinson. There’s 50+ of them in the country and they’re all getting harassed

Why would anyone try and harass someone who is currently in jail? Any Tyler Robinson you reach on the outside obviously isn't the guy...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

Newsweek published this today, talks about the origin of the term "groyper," seems like a very online spin off of incel culture

https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

Daisy Fuentes is involved too!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He was an unhinged leftist and the people who are trying to paint him as a right winger should be ashamed. The only way to lower the temperature of our political climate is to have honest conversations about what is happening. People are becoming increasingly radicalized and justifying the use of violence. Something like this should have never happened and we need to make sure it doesn’t happen in the future. If your kid has a sudden interest in left wing politics then you need to view it as a red flag. Make sure they don’t have access to weapons and suggest that they go to therapy or start exercising.

All evidence so far points to the opposite, but keep sniffing that glue man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

It's 2025, that's not how news works anymore. There are primary sources floating around and the news will take a while to confirm it. If there were pictures of him at an ANTIFA rally I'm sure you would be happy to cite those as evidence enough of his leanings. This is the type of hypocritical cognitive dissonance that defines right wing idiocy.

+1. They were all loudly proclaiming the shooter was a LWNJ before there was any person identified or any evidence. Now we have a ton of it and they all want to wait until it's triple verified by The NY Times and CNN.

[Anonymous]

Cox said that a family member of Robinson had told investigators that at a recent family dinner, Robinson had mentioned Kirk’s upcoming Utah Valley event, and “they talked about why they didn’t like him and the viewpoints that he had,” Cox said. “The family member also stated Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.”

The family member said Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate, not that Kirk wasn’t a groyper.

Nothing in the news article states that the suspect was a fan of Fuentes or groypers.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/12/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-invs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

It’s not new, you’re just too old to know what young people are up to.

Super, then define it. Here. Now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

The groyper thing is because he dressed up as a squatting slav meme for Halloween and his mother posted a Pepe meme that his costume resembled and groyper is a different Pepe meme and yes we are in this stupid stupid timeline where people are arguing or which frog cartoon inspired a murderer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the alleged shooter is chairman of the MAGA committee in St. George, Utah.



What?

DP - I couldn't find anything on that but it looks like he donated to Trump in 2020.

Dude that tax return and address is a different Tyler robinson. There’s 50+ of them in the country and they’re all getting harassed

Why would anyone try and harass someone who is currently in jail? Any Tyler Robinson you reach on the outside obviously isn't the guy...

Simple. Then stop tweeting or posting their personal info.