“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I actually agree that no one should disturb SC Justices at their home, where their innocent families live.

But conservatives don't have a leg to stand on if they whine about attempted murder on Brett Hold My Beer Kavanaugh days after NINETEEN CHILDREN WERE EXPLODED WITH A LEGALLY ACQUIRED ASSAULT WEAPON. Some could only be identified with their DNA.

Conservatives will never have the moral high ground on violence ever again. They actively work to murder children and tens of thousands of Americans every year, with guns. They actively work to make women suffer and force them to bear children they do not want. They only humans they pretend to care about are the ones that have not been born.

If that is not violence, WHAT IS?

Many of us conservatives have been calling for armed protection for students at school for years now. But, Nancy doesn't seem to want to deal with that.
They do that in FL now ever since the Stoneman Douglas shooting.

Gee.... Congress has armed protection. Many stores have armed protection. Celebrities have armed protection. Why not schools?

So do some churches and synagogues and it’s stopped people who wanted to do harm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

Um.... he reported himself after he was confronted with 2 marshals.
Thank goodness that Larry Hogan ensured protection for the Kavanaugh family.

Why does Maryland have to pay for SCOTUS protection? I thought we wanted smaller government.

Sigh. Read the Constitution. Maryland is a STATE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

So you’d be fine with this guy if he open carried and left accessories at home?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.

Are you not paying attention? Someone already showed up to Kavanaugh's house in the middle of the night with a gun. This conservative SCOTUS is going too far, is generating severe backlash and is bringing out the worst. Wake up and realize the right wing needs to reverse course toward the middle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

You are correct to a degree. My husband thinks like those posting here. He doesn’t see himself as a Marxist but he constantly spouts Marxist ideologies and is very locked in to his viewpoints (incidentally, he was more reasonable when we got married years ago). It’s a streak that has run a long time through his family tree (married him before Al Gore invented the internet ) He will not read a broad spectrum of media/sources so I suspect that that’s part of the issue. Oftentimes, he will say something, I will give him a more balanced story, he will vehemently disagree, and a couple days later that same story gets published in a media source he trusts. Even still, it’s hard for him to change his viewpoint. It’s a strange time we live in for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

I agree. This subforum seems to have been infested by extremely far-left people. Anybody who doesn't condone somebody killing a Supreme Court justice because they have different political beliefs i very far gone.

I think Redditors have invaded the forum - young, immature and strange.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

We’ll condemn it when any actual violence occurs. You know, like the mass murder of doctors who perform abortions. The arson. The bullet proof glass at clinics. The Supreme Court ruling that establishing a perimeter around clinics impedes the free speech of these violent lunatics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

So you’d be fine with this guy if he open carried and left accessories at home?

Incoherent, inconsistent right wing gobbledygook. Hypocrisy. Rights for me but not for thee. It was considered "peaceful" by the right wing to have zip ties, tools and weapons when they stormed the US Capitol on J6. Fine for right wing nutjobs to show up armed with AR-15s outside state capitols and governors' homes to protest mask mandates as they did but suddenly now they act shocked to have someone show up armed outside a justice's home to protest the overturn of Roe v Wade. WTF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

So you’d be fine with this guy if he open carried and left accessories at home?

If he was out there protesting openly carrying? Yes. That’s his right if the state/county law determines that it is. The fact he had a concealed gun, a concealed knife, burglary tools, zip ties and a plan makes his different than the typical protestor. If it was women in their cosplay carrying guns on their hips protesting on the sidewalk and the law was on their side, then they are exercising their legal right to protest. I admit I’d probably laugh at the cosplay though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.

Are you not paying attention? Someone already showed up to Kavanaugh's house in the middle of the night with a gun. This conservative SCOTUS is going too far, is generating severe backlash and is bringing out the worst. Wake up and realize the right wing needs to reverse course toward the middle.

Yes, because leftists are out there stating that women suffering ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages will be forced by law to let all women die. The fact is, the media is spouting this incorrect information to whip people up into a frenzy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

I agree. This subforum seems to have been infested by extremely far-left people. Anybody who doesn't condone somebody killing a Supreme Court justice because they have different political beliefs i very far gone.

I think Redditors have invaded the forum - young, immature and strange.

Old, moderate, and absolutely disgusted by Rs trying to take away my bodily autonomy and not protecting our kids with basic common sense gun control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

So you’d be fine with this guy if he open carried and left accessories at home?

If he was out there protesting openly carrying? Yes. That’s his right if the state/county law determines that it is. The fact he had a concealed gun, a concealed knife, burglary tools, zip ties and a plan makes his different than the typical protestor. If it was women in their cosplay carrying guns on their hips protesting on the sidewalk and the law was on their side, then they are exercising their legal right to protest. I admit I’d probably laugh at the cosplay though.

Yeah. All of those idiots running around with cosplay guns are hilarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.

Are you not paying attention? Someone already showed up to Kavanaugh's house in the middle of the night with a gun. This conservative SCOTUS is going too far, is generating severe backlash and is bringing out the worst. Wake up and realize the right wing needs to reverse course toward the middle.

Yes, because leftists are out there stating that women suffering ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages will be forced by law to let all women die. The fact is, the media is spouting this incorrect information to whip people up into a frenzy.

Because the idiots proposing these laws don’t understand how reproductive systems work.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-11/missouri-ectopic-pregnancy-bill-tries-to-limit-abortion-drugs-to-treat-condition

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.

Are you not paying attention? Someone already showed up to Kavanaugh's house in the middle of the night with a gun. This conservative SCOTUS is going too far, is generating severe backlash and is bringing out the worst. Wake up and realize the right wing needs to reverse course toward the middle.

Yes, because leftists are out there stating that women suffering ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages will be forced by law to let all women die. The fact is, the media is spouting this incorrect information to whip people up into a frenzy.

Because the idiots proposing these laws don’t understand how reproductive systems work.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-11/missouri-ectopic-pregnancy-bill-tries-to-limit-abortion-drugs-to-treat-condition

+1. When you start legislating medical practices it becomes murky and doctors will become reluctant to do what they need to do for fear of criminal charges. Even though you say that ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages will be unaffected, it is still going to affect how doctors make medical decisions. LEAVE MEDICINE TO THE EXPERTS NOT UNINFORMED LEGISLATORS, PLEASE!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.

Are you not paying attention? Someone already showed up to Kavanaugh's house in the middle of the night with a gun. This conservative SCOTUS is going too far, is generating severe backlash and is bringing out the worst. Wake up and realize the right wing needs to reverse course toward the middle.

Yes, because leftists are out there stating that women suffering ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages will be forced by law to let all women die. The fact is, the media is spouting this incorrect information to whip people up into a frenzy.

Because the idiots proposing these laws don’t understand how reproductive systems work.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-11/missouri-ectopic-pregnancy-bill-tries-to-limit-abortion-drugs-to-treat-condition

A left wing article telling us the law and the law itself are often different.