“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

Um.... he reported himself after he was confronted with 2 marshals.
Thank goodness that Larry Hogan ensured protection for the Kavanaugh family.

The federal marshals this guy encountered at Kavanaugh’s house have nothing to do with Larry Hogan.

Also the marshals encountered him AFTER he called the Montgomery County police. He was still on the phone with the police when the marshals came up to him. Read the complaint.

The guy was arrested by police under the current protection arrangement. How does more protection alter the result? If McConnell wants to eliminate the threat, then he should fund mental health and vote for gun control. Otherwise, give Brett and his family some guns and limit the number of doors to his house. If that’s a good enough solution for schools, then it’s good enough for Brett and his beer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

Um.... he reported himself after he was confronted with 2 marshals.
Thank goodness that Larry Hogan ensured protection for the Kavanaugh family.

The federal marshals this guy encountered at Kavanaugh’s house have nothing to do with Larry Hogan.

Also the marshals encountered him AFTER he called the Montgomery County police. He was still on the phone with the police when the marshals came up to him. Read the complaint.

The guy was arrested by police under the current protection arrangement. How does more protection alter the result? If McConnell wants to eliminate the threat, then he should fund mental health and vote for gun control. Otherwise, give Brett and his family some guns and limit the number of doors to his house. If that’s a good enough solution for schools, then it’s good enough for Brett and his beer.

+1
If we all have to live in fear, so should he.

Think of all the fear that Bretty and his religious tribunal chums will be causing in the next few years: abused women have even more reasons to fear marital rape as birth control and abortion will be completely out of reach. Doctors and nurses and anyone else involved with any kind of abortion or something that may be construed as abortion have to fear for their jobs and prosecution. Sexually active women will have to treat sex with the level of fear it once inspired. Women and their husbands who are looking forward to starting a family or adding to a family are going to have to approach each pregnancy as if it’s a death sentence in case something goes wrong.

So much pain and anguish so that Bretty and his sit bag buddies can feel like they have power over us all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

They are public servants. So, yes, publish their addresses, phone numbers, where his wife works and where his kids go to school. They deserve no pity.

So a conservative nut job should be able to find Kagan and try to assisinate her if he does not like her opinion???

No. Just the ones who lied to get confirmed--gorsich, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Thomas, Alito also probably lied.

[Anonymous]

I’ll never forget that photo of red-faced Brett with a stunned and shell-shocked wife. The family has vacant stares. I don’t think things in that family are happy.

[Anonymous]

Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

I agree. This subforum seems to have been infested by extremely far-left people. Anybody who doesn't condone somebody killing a Supreme Court justice because they have different political beliefs i very far gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading the comments here from people who are presumably "liberal" or "Democrats" tell me one thing.
These folks aren't Democrats. They are not liberals. They are some kind of Marxist following fringe of the left.

My Democratic friends have condemned this planned assassination by a lunatic. They don't make excuses for him. They don't "whatabout" this incident.
They flat out condemn it. I have yet to see any DCUM keyboard warrior condemn it. Very telling.

LOL. Marxist. You are so out of touch.

He turned himself in. What is there to condemn?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

Um.... he reported himself after he was confronted with 2 marshals.
Thank goodness that Larry Hogan ensured protection for the Kavanaugh family.

The federal marshals this guy encountered at Kavanaugh’s house have nothing to do with Larry Hogan.

Also the marshals encountered him AFTER he called the Montgomery County police. He was still on the phone with the police when the marshals came up to him. Read the complaint.

The guy was arrested by police under the current protection arrangement. How does more protection alter the result? If McConnell wants to eliminate the threat, then he should fund mental health and vote for gun control. Otherwise, give Brett and his family some guns and limit the number of doors to his house. If that’s a good enough solution for schools, then it’s good enough for Brett and his beer.

Exactly. He should lock his doors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democrats better seize on this chaos in the court and immediately expand it to offset the illegitimate members (roberts, kavs, acb, thomas, gorsuch, and alito) and remove the stain of shariah law and fascism being foisted on women. We are watching!

You really want the Democrats to never win another election, don't you?
This is insane. And, there are NO illegitimate members of the court. It's rhetoric like this that leads crazies to try to assassinate those he disagrees with.

Let's see:. McConnell refused to give Garland a hearing because it was an election year and the American people deserved a vote on this. Amy c
Barret confirmed in last months of Trump's term, apparently, the American people do not deserve a vote.

Kavanaugh never properly vetted by FBI. Women who wanted to testify about his behavior toward them given no opportunity to testify. He has not been cleared of rape. Very suspicious financial windfalls paying off huge debt. He perjured himself at hearing.

Neil Gorsuch has the stolen seat of Garland.

We know that Thomas lied in his hearing. We also know that he has ruled in a way to help his wife.

The three confirmed under Trump are stolen seats by the criminal McConnell.

It is not surprising that someone is so disgusted that they feel compelled to cut out the cancer one by one. Just wait until Roe v. Wade decision is handed down. All three confirmed in Trump administration said this was settled law. They lied under oath and should be impeached. They put the target on themselves and they can live or die with this. Legal abortion will no longer be available but women will resort to back street abortion and die. One of these women's husband will go off the deep end and he can easily get his hands of an AR-15.

+1

The current SCOTUS is defunct.

It’s your opinion as you are a Liberal. If court was liberal leaning, I’m sure you would be singing it’s praises…
Sorry you ar who set at the balance of the court, but hey, that’s why elections matter.

It’s the opinion of anyone who values ethics. Lying and corruption are never ok. Religious extremists pushing minority view to overthrow decades of court rulings is never ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I actually agree that no one should disturb SC Justices at their home, where their innocent families live.

But conservatives don't have a leg to stand on if they whine about attempted murder on Brett Hold My Beer Kavanaugh days after NINETEEN CHILDREN WERE EXPLODED WITH A LEGALLY ACQUIRED ASSAULT WEAPON. Some could only be identified with their DNA.

Conservatives will never have the moral high ground on violence ever again. They actively work to murder children and tens of thousands of Americans every year, with guns. They actively work to make women suffer and force them to bear children they do not want. They only humans they pretend to care about are the ones that have not been born.

If that is not violence, WHAT IS?

Many of us conservatives have been calling for armed protection for students at school for years now. But, Nancy doesn't seem to want to deal with that.
They do that in FL now ever since the Stoneman Douglas shooting.

Gee.... Congress has armed protection. Many stores have armed protection. Celebrities have armed protection. Why not schools?

No sane person wants more guns in schools. WTAF?

So why is Rittenhouse, the person, responsible in lib eyes but the gun is responsible in the Uvalde shooting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

What about those same threats against members of congress on 1/6? Did you consider those a serious threat? Will you be watching the hearings with interest and curiosity?

Republicans have difficulty with humor at the best of times but multiple pps making fun of the incoherent logic of the GOP is too many jokes in a row to understand and the FoxBot100 will return once the steam stops pouring out of his ears and he’s recited his talking points to calm himself.

Punctuation is your friend….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Protection for justices, not for kids.

Yup after listening to this

the scumbags want to do nothing and yet think Justice "I love beer"'s life is more precious. Says everything about th "pro-my-foot-life" party!

Wasn’t Diane Feinstein exposed as having a gun in her purse for protection (as well as armed body guards) while stating people should not have guns? When exposed, she turned it in. So I don’t really think that democrats have a leg to stand on. They can afford armed body guards and hire them, and literally have said it’s because they are targets. They are no more targets than some people in the inner cities who live in poverty.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

What difference does that make?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It will never come to that. Ever. This is literal liberal blood fantasy.