Getting good, qualified teachers for highly motivated students is extremely difficult. It's not a matter of finding warm bodies. PHS magnet programs (minus PHS GE program) have been around 15 years or so, finding magnet teachers has always been an issue. MCPS will try to find how many now? |
4 times more. Blair SMACS cannot find a good magnet statistics teacher either after the previous one promoted to management. |
And these are finer details of successful magnet program people don't fully understand - importance of cohorts, importance of teachers, importance of support structure from home (that's you parents) and kids who are driven to do well. All of these have to be lined up. While not perfect, the current program has all of these (but I think not enough good teachers is the weak link right now) |
As a federal scientist, totally agree with your points. And to add upon your second bullet, Dr. Taylor had explicitly emphasized multiple times that MCPS doesn't have the budget nor necessity to recruit talents out from the market. |
Ask yourself why they cannot just offer acceleration in 9th and 10th instead of canceling the highly selective magnets? Hint - because they are not actually interested in tracking kids. They want to stop tracking. the regional magnets will be lottery based and will not offer the acceleration you envision. |
This part of the conversation really interests me. I do not know enough about the current situation or solutions, but I think differentiated instruction across schools for all 4 years is really important. It’s important in MS too. This is something I got in my run of the mill large public HS back in the day (not MoCo) and it feels important. |
There's no tracking nor differentiation since MS in MCPS. It's honor-for-all. The special programs are created for creating some differentiation, and it's going to be honor-for-all again soon once the regional model is implemented. Central office people don't care for education, don't care about students, and don't care about teachers either. They care about how to spend tax payer's money to create the "achievements" on their resume. And BOE should be hold accountable for unanimously applauding everything central office claim as "achievements". |
It’s impossible to understand, though. They have differentiated math pathways. Why can’t they offer an accelerated and grade level option in English? You don’t even need to gatekeep. You can let the kids/families choose and you don’t need to stay on the same path permanently if you want on/off ramps. |
It is important. And in most area public schools that are not magnets, differentiation has been whittled way way down to math starting in 7th, and then APs starting in 11th. And some districts have attempted to get rid of MS math acceleration as well. |
+1111. At least teachers have an organized mechanism to press for their interests. parents do not. will be interesting to see if the cohort of magnet parents will be able to have any sort of impact here. |
Because math is maybe the only pedagogical area that they cannot escape the fact that requires an established sequence and content that some kids can accelerate into and others cannot. But I’m sure they can always try to f up math too. |
Why would they care? |
+1 The kids currently in the walled-off programs will be able to finish in their bespoke jewel in which some classes serve 5-10 kids. In the meantime, MCPS will build a set of programs that serve many more kids, offering accelerated and enriched instruction to an additional 200 or so kids per year (assuming we're only talking about STEM, because DCUM is always only talking about STEM). The only people who would be upset are the folks who feel sure down to the tips of their toes that their own personal kid would absolutely get into RMIB or SMCS, which is like all of those working Republicans who vote for tax policies to benefit the wealthy because they are sure they will also be millionaires one day. |
YES. Having an *option* for a class that high school students can take, if they are interested in doing a bit more / more challenging reading, is not at all "tracking." |
10-15 years from now, we will all look back at this as another failed MCPS initiatives with a superintendent who will be long gone by then. |