Wow that is an unhinged take. |
Maybe... but not wrong. |
And smart kids exist all throughout the county. We're not going to continue to pretend like only 90 kids out of a class of 10K+ are the only ones that deserves access to opportunity. |
Agreed. Taylor will be known as the guy who threw away the most renowned MCPS programs. |
The big difference is the W and a few other schools have lots of opportunities for smart kids whereas other schools offer very little. Instead of this non-sense they should offer classes at other schools, bus those kids for classes at other schools or offer it virtually so all kids who need/want higher level classes have the opportunities to take them. |
There is a 1000 students apply for 125 slots at RM, and 800+ for 90 at Poolesville Ecology. It seems we have the students. |
+1 And thankfully my youngest will be out of mcps next year. |
Kids have to be a baseline smart but if you work ahead in math/english at home they can do much better on the map tests. You can just get soem workbooks and fun apps, you don't need a center or tutor at that age. |
Looks like they are planning to offer classes at others schools, via a new region model and proposing DE/Distance and Virtual Learning for some higher level. So looks like they are doing exactly what you suggest. |
+1 ITA. Finding STEM teachers is hard enough. Finding qualified STEM teachers to teach magnet level classes across six regions will be 6x as hard. Let's be honest.. some of these programs will be "magnets" in name only. The teaching quality and peer level won't be equal across the board. |
you mean you have the numbers but not enough high performing kids |
Middle school magnets are on the chopping block next year. I haven't heard about the gifted and talented programs at the elementary school levels, but it makes sense those will be cancelled after the middle school programs are unwound. |
dp. I had one kid go through a magnet and one not. I would rather keep the magnets for super high achieving kids than water it down. These magnets are one of the few shining stars in MCPS. Watering it down, and yes, it will get watered down if you try to create six regional programs, will effectively kill that shining star. Such a shame. I'm all for creating additional programs, but not getting rid of the county wide magnets that attract the very top achieving students. |
Did we learn nothing from the pandemic? Virtual learning is not effective and hands-on learning can't occur. |
Right. I think that's what MCPS wants: have the "magnet" in name for many students, but the quality? They will turn a blind eye. And it seems no one has mentioned how MCPS plans to address transportation for the magnet programs across the six regions. I bet it will be a mess. |