Bill Ackman forgives wife for plagiarism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.

You couldn't get in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Does her TED talk make sense to you? This is the emperor’s new clothes.

Sorry you aren’t bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.

You couldn't get in.

I am not a DEI and I have no money so they wouldn’t consider me. I am just a hard working pleb who keeps the wheel turning for everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who directly plagiarizes doesn’t deserve a PhD from anywhere.

+ 1million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I also watched a TED talk and I cannot be the only one not comprehending what this woman is saying. What utter BS. How she ended up at MIT is tragic.

Reminds me of how they propped up Epstein as a genius investor guru.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also watched a TED talk and I cannot be the only one not comprehending what this woman is saying. What utter BS. How she ended up at MIT is tragic.

Reminds me of how they propped up Epstein as a genius investor guru.

Who is "they"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is no longer a university professor nor is she a president of any university. Embarrassing? Yes Impactful to anyone other than her? No

Her Ph.D. should be rescinded.

So long as you agree that all other academics with the same issue (or worse, like Gay) also lose theirs. That’s gonna be a lot of rescinded PhDs.

Fine we don’t need liars and cheats in higher education, this is a wonderful thing. Upholding academic integrity is in the best interests of everyone.

You know how happy this would make the right-wing? It would decimate the ranks of academia which is almost entirely quite leftist.

Just wait until PragerU sets up Khmer Rouge style re-education camps

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also watched a TED talk and I cannot be the only one not comprehending what this woman is saying. What utter BS. How she ended up at MIT is tragic.

Reminds me of how they propped up Epstein as a genius investor guru.

Who is "they"?

Epstein’s friends, anyone associated with him? Anyone who didn’t choose see what a disgusting person he was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also watched a TED talk and I cannot be the only one not comprehending what this woman is saying. What utter BS. How she ended up at MIT is tragic.

Reminds me of how they propped up Epstein as a genius investor guru.

Who is "they"?

The media and his powerful orbit.

[Anonymous]

Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Ackman needs to cut her loose and he knows it. It is only a matter of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.

You couldn't get in.

I am not a DEI and I have no money so they wouldn’t consider me. I am just a hard working pleb who keeps the wheel turning for everyone else.

If they only admit DEI, why is the school majority white? Hmmmm....

Also, she was clearly not an DEI candidate and yet she got in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.

You couldn't get in.

I am not a DEI and I have no money so they wouldn’t consider me. I am just a hard working pleb who keeps the wheel turning for everyone else.

If they only admit DEI, why is the school majority white? Hmmmm....

Also, she was clearly not an DEI candidate and yet she got in.

She is not a poor white girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.

Evidence for this assertion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.

Evidence for this assertion?

She would have to provide proof. She has no credibility now.