Bill Ackman forgives wife for plagiarism

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.


Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!



+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.


Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.



You couldn't get in.

I am not a DEI and I have no money so they wouldn’t consider me. I am just a hard working pleb who keeps the wheel turning for everyone else.


If they only admit DEI, why is the school majority white? Hmmmm....

Also, she was clearly not an DEI candidate and yet she got in.


She is totally a DEI candidate.
Anonymous
How is Bill not realizing that she was the "DEI admit" back in the 2000s?

MIT graduate programs are currently 61% male, 39% female. It was A LOT worse back in the mid 2000s when she would have enrolled.

No wonder they took such a lightweight LOL
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How is Bill not realizing that she was the "DEI admit" back in the 2000s?

MIT graduate programs are currently 61% male, 39% female. It was A LOT worse back in the mid 2000s when she would have enrolled.

No wonder they took such a lightweight LOL


You should see how bad the male-female imbalance was in the 1980s when I was a student in Boston with friends at MIT. I don’t think that younger people realize that women have always been the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ackman needs to cut her loose and he knows it. It is only a matter of time.


They have a kid together. Presumably a test tube baby because she was 43 when it happened. If Alec Baldwin didn’t leave his fake Spanish yoga wife, I doubt Bill leaves his fake academic wife.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?

He does now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ackman needs to cut her loose and he knows it. It is only a matter of time.


They have a kid together. Presumably a test tube baby because she was 43 when it happened. If Alec Baldwin didn’t leave his fake Spanish yoga wife, I doubt Bill leaves his fake academic wife.


Alec Baldwin has to take any job that comes his way because he's nearly broke due to his brood of kids, expensive lifetime, and insane legal expenses. He can't afford to divorce his wife; this is a fact.

Ackman does not have those issues. He can cut her loose whenever he wants. Plus, after what we paid out to his first wife (they were together since their early 20s) he likely required the new wife to sign an ironclad pre-nup.
Anonymous
Surely it is possible to leave the "quality of their marriage" alone? Assume they are happy together and leave it at that.

Aren't these plagiarism enough schadenfreude enough?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Surely it is possible to leave the "quality of their marriage" alone? Assume they are happy together and leave it at that.

Aren't these plagiarism enough schadenfreude enough?

No because this guy would walk over most of us if we were in fire.
Anonymous
*on fire
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Surely it is possible to leave the "quality of their marriage" alone? Assume they are happy together and leave it at that.

Aren't these plagiarism enough schadenfreude enough?

No because this guy would walk over most of us if we were in fire.


That guy's major malfunction is overreaching / overreacting. And just like any other schoolyard bully if the other kids reacts in kind then everyone is seen as equally guilty. Just let him cook in his own stew. No need to jump in there with him!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?


Could you cool it with the vile sexism? You are making me sympathetic to Oxman and Ackman and that’s remarkable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?


Could you cool it with the vile sexism? You are making me sympathetic to Oxman and Ackman and that’s remarkable.

Ackman opened this can of worms, when he stops bullying others and stops slandering people, then we can ease up. Sometimes it pays to stand up to bullies and liars and cheats.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?


Could you cool it with the vile sexism? You are making me sympathetic to Oxman and Ackman and that’s remarkable.

Ackman opened this can of worms, when he stops bullying others and stops slandering people, then we can ease up. Sometimes it pays to stand up to bullies and liars and cheats.


No, I don’t accept that I need to embrace vile sexism to “stand up” to anyone, and at this point Ackman seems a lot more rational than you do. You are a disgusting sexist, nothing more. He has detailed facts (as does Oxman) published in his Twitter account. You just have deeply misogynist tropes and slurs. It’s you who are the bully, you who are the liar, you who are the cheat.

I didn’t and still don’t believe everything Ackman has said, but in this debate at this point he looks far more rational and fact-based than you do. You’re nothing but disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her MIT PhD should be stripped. I doubt her CV ever qualified her to be in program in the first place.


Evidence for this assertion?


Eyes and ears? She is a transparent phony; a pseud. She’s basically an attractive actress spewing buzzwords. Created with the help of MIT and PR media ecosystem. Does Bill realize he was a mark?


Could you cool it with the vile sexism? You are making me sympathetic to Oxman and Ackman and that’s remarkable.

Ackman opened this can of worms, when he stops bullying others and stops slandering people, then we can ease up. Sometimes it pays to stand up to bullies and liars and cheats.


No, I don’t accept that I need to embrace vile sexism to “stand up” to anyone, and at this point Ackman seems a lot more rational than you do. You are a disgusting sexist, nothing more. He has detailed facts (as does Oxman) published in his Twitter account. You just have deeply misogynist tropes and slurs. It’s you who are the bully, you who are the liar, you who are the cheat.

I didn’t and still don’t believe everything Ackman has said, but in this debate at this point he looks far more rational and fact-based than you do. You’re nothing but disgusting.

I am not the ‘sexist’ pp nor am I sexist myself. Ackman is a multigenerational millionaire/billionaire nepotism baby who could give two flying f’s about people like me and most of us, and I am his same color. He and his wife have absolutely no idea what living in the real world is like. They seem very out of touch like most billionaires I presume. I have known narcissists like him who would lie, cheat, steal and slander you to get ahead and before they accept any fault. He’s sorry his wife got caught, he realizes that she’s an incompetent fraud, or maybe this just reinforces everyone’s perceptions, or maybe he doesn’t care. He wants to ruin others’ reputations? well karma has come back to haunt him.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: