Bill Ackman forgives wife for plagiarism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nori’s schtick is her career as as a bio architect or whatever. Well, she is a fraud. Bill can chase down other plagiarists but all he needs to do is look right next to him and there she is, she’s just as bad a Gay if not worse. Why is she worse? Because she directly quoted Wikipedia, that is unbelievable, it just proves that you can buy a degree. Nothing like shooting yourself in the foot.

How'd she get into a PhD program at MIT in the first place? Who rubber-stamped her unimpressive thinly sourced dissertation? And why was someone so unimpressive offered tenure at MIT when brilliant scholars don't get in the front door? Where did this woman suddenly come from? All the profiles about how impressive she is. So much ink and puff pieces creating this woman. Dating Brad Pitt. It's all very strange. Next thing you know she seems to have a powerful billionaire wrapped around her finger.

I was wondering the same things. Someone on Twitter pointed out that her PhD thesis misdefines tensors (and pulls the figure from Wikipedia). I watched a clip of her TED talk…she built this bizarre wearable intestine that had E. Coli in it. I mean that’s…interesting, but tenure at MIT? The technical faculty I know at elite institutions don’t cut and paste from Wiki or hang out with Brad Pitt. Yet everyone says she is this really respected scholar.

I saw a video of her going on about how she worked in a man’s world and embraced her femininity. Maybe Ackman is right; academia has rot in it and both plagiarism and DEI hires occur, except he missed that part of the rot was his wife.

This certainly doesn't reflect a careful analysis of evidence, but thanks for the cherry-picked sexist claptrap. Her design work is quite innovative.

[Anonymous]

A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nori’s schtick is her career as as a bio architect or whatever. Well, she is a fraud. Bill can chase down other plagiarists but all he needs to do is look right next to him and there she is, she’s just as bad a Gay if not worse. Why is she worse? Because she directly quoted Wikipedia, that is unbelievable, it just proves that you can buy a degree. Nothing like shooting yourself in the foot.

How'd she get into a PhD program at MIT in the first place? Who rubber-stamped her unimpressive thinly sourced dissertation? And why was someone so unimpressive offered tenure at MIT when brilliant scholars don't get in the front door? Where did this woman suddenly come from? All the profiles about how impressive she is. So much ink and puff pieces creating this woman. Dating Brad Pitt. It's all very strange. Next thing you know she seems to have a powerful billionaire wrapped around her finger.

I was wondering the same things. Someone on Twitter pointed out that her PhD thesis misdefines tensors (and pulls the figure from Wikipedia). I watched a clip of her TED talk…she built this bizarre wearable intestine that had E. Coli in it. I mean that’s…interesting, but tenure at MIT? The technical faculty I know at elite institutions don’t cut and paste from Wiki or hang out with Brad Pitt. Yet everyone says she is this really respected scholar.

I saw a video of her going on about how she worked in a man’s world and embraced her femininity. Maybe Ackman is right; academia has rot in it and both plagiarism and DEI hires occur, except he missed that part of the rot was his wife.

This certainly doesn't reflect a careful analysis of evidence, but thanks for the cherry-picked sexist claptrap. Her design work is quite innovative.

But what has she accomplished besides creating art basically? And having ‘wild’ ideas about nature, by the way her nature ideas occur ‘naturally’. She doesn’t seem very avante garde or innovative. Maybe I am too uneducated to comprehend.

[Anonymous]

Cars made from mushrooms….

[Anonymous]

Tragic that her arrogance shadowed the blaring fact that she had no place going to MIT. This is so embarrassing, if she wasn’t a billionaire I would pity her for being so delusional.

[Anonymous]

The TED talk seals the deal, the wiki plagiarism is god awful and so ignorant and uneducated for any undergrad. Then I watched a TED talk and it explains her juvenile mistake, it all makes sense now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is no longer a university professor nor is she a president of any university. Embarrassing? Yes Impactful to anyone other than her? No

Her Ph.D. should be rescinded.

So long as you agree that all other academics with the same issue (or worse, like Gay) also lose theirs. That’s gonna be a lot of rescinded PhDs.

Fine we don’t need liars and cheats in higher education, this is a wonderful thing. Upholding academic integrity is in the best interests of everyone.

You know how happy this would make the right-wing? It would decimate the ranks of academia which is almost entirely quite leftist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is no longer a university professor nor is she a president of any university. Embarrassing? Yes Impactful to anyone other than her? No

Her Ph.D. should be rescinded.

So long as you agree that all other academics with the same issue (or worse, like Gay) also lose theirs. That’s gonna be a lot of rescinded PhDs.

Fine we don’t need liars and cheats in higher education, this is a wonderful thing. Upholding academic integrity is in the best interests of everyone.

You know how happy this would make the right-wing? It would decimate the ranks of academia which is almost entirely quite leftist.

Please that woke mob of conservatives are all about lying and cheating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who directly plagiarizes doesn’t deserve a PhD from anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Does her TED talk make sense to you? This is the emperor’s new clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A PhD in art perhaps for Oxman, maybe her art is okay. 3D printing stuff, kinda cool. A PhD from MIT….. this is tragic.

Wow. You obviously know nothing about MIT. Such ignorance proudly on display here!

+1 It's the uber-confident assertion of ignorance that really sells it!

Can you honestly watch her TED talk and come to the conclusion that this is anything innovative? It’s nonsense, what has she produced besides art? Skin on buildings? okay that’s been done before, real skin that grows? How about cancer and yeast and things like that? On buildings. It sounds like gobble de gook.

Oh do go on. I am enjoying this. What else out of MIT do you consider “gobble de gook”? Could you take a look at the output of the MIT design lab and enlighten us all?

Apparently dolts can attend MIT.