“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democrats better seize on this chaos in the court and immediately expand it to offset the illegitimate members (roberts, kavs, acb, thomas, gorsuch, and alito) and remove the stain of shariah law and fascism being foisted on women. We are watching!

You really want the Democrats to never win another election, don't you?
This is insane. And, there are NO illegitimate members of the court. It's rhetoric like this that leads crazies to try to assassinate those he disagrees with.

Yes. Better to just accept women dying in back alleys (nice priorities by the way)! Also, no one said anything about assassinating anybody. The court could be fixed procedurally fully in line with the constitution.
And to the majority of Americans, the justices that let their religion dictate their rulings (especially when women lives are on the line) are completely illegitimate.

Everyone has a philosophy--even atheists--about living that influences their thinking and decisions. I'm guessing you approve only of Supreme Court justices that agree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Good. Are they are carrying guns?

You folks who appear to be rooting for the assassination of a Supreme Court Justices are insane.
Your rhetoric and your cheering for this crap is actually dangerous.

You had no problem with dangerous rhetoric when your orange hero was leading the charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Good. Are they are carrying guns?

You folks who appear to be rooting for the assassination of a Supreme Court Justices are insane.
Your rhetoric and your cheering for this crap is actually dangerous.

I said it was good they were protesting. And I asked if they were carrying guns.

How does that “cheer” for anything aside from protests?

Conservatives love to play victim. It’s a fetish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

[Anonymous]

I actually agree that no one should disturb SC Justices at their home, where their innocent families live.

But conservatives don't have a leg to stand on if they whine about attempted murder on Brett Hold My Beer Kavanaugh days after NINETEEN CHILDREN WERE EXPLODED WITH A LEGALLY ACQUIRED ASSAULT WEAPON. Some could only be identified with their DNA.

Conservatives will never have the moral high ground on violence ever again. They actively work to murder children and tens of thousands of Americans every year, with guns. They actively work to make women suffer and force them to bear children they do not want. They only humans they pretend to care about are the ones that have not been born.

If that is not violence, WHAT IS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

This is very serious indeed, but we shouldn't be too quick to act. We need to carefully consider solutions and come up with a bipartisan agreement. This person was obviously mentally unbalanced, but we certainly should not invest any money into mental health services. Here's my common sense proposal:
1) all justice's houses should have only one door
2) their kids, spouses and neighbors should be armed and posted outside if they are veterans

3) the Uvalde police department will be assigned to protect the justice's houses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:The guy who was going to shoot Kavanaugh appears to be a couple of bricks short of a load. He called the police on himself:

This is clearly a false flag operation.

How so?

Nicholas John Roske was armed with a handgun, knife, pepper spray, burglary tools, zip ties, and other items such as hammers.
He said he wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh.
How is this "false flag?"

A judge was just murdered by being zip tied and shot.

He reported himself. Clearly he had no intent to do this. He just wanted to get a pro-GOP media narrative going.

Um.... he reported himself after he was confronted with 2 marshals.
Thank goodness that Larry Hogan ensured protection for the Kavanaugh family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Good. Are they are carrying guns?

You folks who appear to be rooting for the assassination of a Supreme Court Justices are insane.
Your rhetoric and your cheering for this crap is actually dangerous.

Is it also dangerous to cheer on an attempt to assassinate the VP? Just wondering for no reason at all.

Great question. Is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I actually agree that no one should disturb SC Justices at their home, where their innocent families live.

But conservatives don't have a leg to stand on if they whine about attempted murder on Brett Hold My Beer Kavanaugh days after NINETEEN CHILDREN WERE EXPLODED WITH A LEGALLY ACQUIRED ASSAULT WEAPON. Some could only be identified with their DNA.

Conservatives will never have the moral high ground on violence ever again. They actively work to murder children and tens of thousands of Americans every year, with guns. They actively work to make women suffer and force them to bear children they do not want. They only humans they pretend to care about are the ones that have not been born.

If that is not violence, WHAT IS?

Many of us conservatives have been calling for armed protection for students at school for years now. But, Nancy doesn't seem to want to deal with that.
They do that in FL now ever since the Stoneman Douglas shooting.

Gee.... Congress has armed protection. Many stores have armed protection. Celebrities have armed protection. Why not schools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

It seems that you understand why people think criminals who kill people should be punished.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices are out of their minds if they think they will ever be safe again.

That is what happens when you enslave a gender.

War.

So you are okay with publishing the addresses of the more liberal members of the court?

Remember one day; there will be a decision conservatives don’t like.

Do they ever plan to go to a restaurant? See a play? Be in any kind of non conservative crowd?

Their sins will quickly stack up against them, and they will have enemies everywhere.

My wife dies of a miscarriage because some doctor won't treat her? I will be out for blood.

That's right. Follow Auntie Maxine's advice and get in their faces. Tell them they are not wanted.
And, hopefully, you will be arrested.