Hayfield Football Coach Fired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s Hayfraud people, get it right!

Childish

Yeah just shows the mentality of these people. A bunch of name calling, lies, and pure hate for the success of the program. Smh. They ought to get some business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s Hayfraud people, get it right!

Childish

Nope sorry - hilarious AND right on point. Couldn’t be more accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s Hayfraud people, get it right!

Childish

Nope sorry - hilarious AND right on point. Couldn’t be more accurate.

If Hayfield are such cheaters, why are they still playing?

[Anonymous]

Football drama aside, if the gun charge rumor is true, FCPS should’ve expelled this student.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Football drama aside, if the gun charge rumor is true, FCPS should’ve expelled this student.

No don’t worry, FCPS spent 400 hours investigating that gun incident and concluded nothing wrong. And if police decide otherwise, FCPS in house counsel will personally mount a Saul Goodman type defense in court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s Hayfraud people, get it right!

Childish

Yeah just shows the mentality of these people. A bunch of name calling, lies, and pure hate for the success of the program. Smh. They ought to get some business.

Actually who shouldn’t get business are any of the businesses that sponsor Hayfraud athletics. Just as someone said earlier. I hope as others in the community see those sponsor banners that they learn which businesses to boycott.

[Anonymous]

Actually who shouldn’t get business are any of the businesses that sponsor Hayfraud athletics. Just as someone said earlier. I hope as others in the community see those sponsor banners that they learn which businesses to boycott.

Possibly boycott Nike, since Hayfield is an "official Nike school". The sponsor banners are often from hyper local small businesses whose owners have or had students at the school. I don't think it is right to punish them since many have also supported in years past, prior to this colossal shit show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Actually who shouldn’t get business are any of the businesses that sponsor Hayfraud athletics. Just as someone said earlier. I hope as others in the community see those sponsor banners that they learn which businesses to boycott.

Possibly boycott Nike, since Hayfield is an "official Nike school". The sponsor banners are often from hyper local small businesses whose owners have or had students at the school. I don't think it is right to punish them since many have also supported in years past, prior to this colossal shit show.

It’s not a boycott of Nike that will get anywhere. It is more letting Nike know who they are having represent them. A coach offering drugs to a kid and a school found in violation of rules. Throw in the social media posts of coaches and doesn’t look so great for Nike.

[Anonymous]

New Fairfax Times article out that School Board tried to put out a we love Reid letter but didn’t get all to agree to sign.

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/school-board-chair-fails-in-campaign-to-have-board-members-issue-a-letter-of-support/article_9145aef4-a9cc-11ef-9e43-ef9a653b599d.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New Fairfax Times article out that School Board tried to put out a we love Reid letter but didn’t get all to agree to sign.

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/school-board-chair-fails-in-campaign-to-have-board-members-issue-a-letter-of-support/article_9145aef4-a9cc-11ef-9e43-ef9a653b599d.html

Their we love Reid letter was giving her a raise and extending her contract in the middle of all this Hayfield controversy.

But that Karl Frisch guy sure does sound like a dodo.

[Anonymous]

Was just looking at the Hayfield Website and came across this noticed a an option called "Race, Racism and Equity Resources" under "resources" on the main menu. Not only is it filled with grammatical errors, but seemingly one of a kind. There is no such information on the websites of Edison, West Po, Mount Vernon or Lewis. I wonder if Nardos King, Chief Equity Officer, or anyone at FCPS is aware or endorses this. https://hayfieldss.fcps.edu/Equity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was just looking at the Hayfield Website and came across this noticed a an option called "Race, Racism and Equity Resources" under "resources" on the main menu. Not only is it filled with grammatical errors, but seemingly one of a kind. There is no such information on the websites of Edison, West Po, Mount Vernon or Lewis. I wonder if Nardos King, Chief Equity Officer, or anyone at FCPS is aware or endorses this. https://hayfieldss.fcps.edu/Equity

Irrelevant to this thread. Start a new one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not every kid plays high school football with the notion that they are going to play in college or go pro. They just want to be on a team. To learn hard work, discipline, how to be part of a team, how to handle wins and losses, etc. And even if their team sucks, they don't give up. They play with integrity. This whole Freefield/Hayfraud mentality of if you don't win like we do , you suck and should just give up, is real loser mentality. At the end of it all, they may be leaving each game with the scoreboard highly tipped in their favor, but they are the real losers with their attitude and mentality.

This is perfectly stated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Fairfax Times article out that School Board tried to put out a we love Reid letter but didn’t get all to agree to sign.

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/school-board-chair-fails-in-campaign-to-have-board-members-issue-a-letter-of-support/article_9145aef4-a9cc-11ef-9e43-ef9a653b599d.html

Their we love Reid letter was giving her a raise and extending her contract in the middle of all this Hayfield controversy.

But that Karl Frisch guy sure does sound like a dodo.

I think you mean dildo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another logical, deductive conclusion… Overton came into Hayfield and didn’t care what he had there already because he knew the all transfers were coming. Why else would he destroy a relationship with the previous seasons starting quarterback unless he already knew he had a private school, future D1 kid coming to start for Hayfield???

Destroy a relationship? The coach is the coach and the player should respect the coach. When a better player moves into the school zone and transfers in, he should treat them both equally and do what’s best for the team.

The white entitlement is something else.

A black coach (45+) mistreats a white player (16 maybe) its white entitlement?

How was this other child “mistreated” was it because he was replaced or were there other issues. If the kids are practicing and I’m sure every coach has an idea of who they want. Did the other kid try or just claim some sort of mistreatment and then leave. Every parent that has a kid that plays QB knows, that’s a high profile spot, from youth league until as high as you go. I’m not saying anyone is right or wrong because I don’t know, but I do believe in competing

He was mistreated because the coach dared to start the Black kid who was a better player. The coach didn’t understand that the boy was white and he’s supposed to start.

The last resort of those with no argument...claim racism. Got you Hayfraud cucks are pitiful.

I mean - it seems pretty clear that new kid (black?) was better than prior kid (white?)? Life is full of hard knocks - realizing you are not the best (not even close) player in a sport is one of them. Not sure why this is a big deal.

This is funny when talking about the QB. Kid couldn't hack it at a WCAC program so his family ran like children to a school where he could get reps.