Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Andrew must be so happy right now. Not a single blip of him being a child-rapist. Is there any possibility that this is partially orchestrated to for that purpose?

There was barely a blip about Andrew and the alleged pedophilia prior to this as well from the Rota media, at least. They're hiding it, likely at the request of the BRF, and probably have been for years. The British media has barely covered Andrew's disgusting behavior -- most of the solid reporting on him has been from US media. It's only now that they can't keep ignoring it because of US coverage that it's getting any traction in the UK.

That's mostly an example of how awful the BRF is, and I do think it's possible the courtiers linked the H&M plan early to distract from Andrew, but I doubt H&M had anything to do with it.

Selective memory? It was covered pretty thoroughly last year before the Harry + Meghan thing broke out. All that press around Andrew being effectively fired from royal duties by his mother. All the furor over the interview he gave and how it effectively destroyed him and his future. And people are still talking about it - as this thread shows.

I suspect the real reason it hasn't gained much traction is because aspects of the case are still up in the air and speculation and there's legal ramifications surrounding it and people are waiting to see what happens next. The girl in question was also 17, not 7, which is what most people think of when they hear the word pedophile. Still under age but not quite in the same way. So the perception is that he's a fat lewd old guy going after a nubile teen, which is not the same as someone going after a child.

You know, when you are resorting to defending Andrew on the basis of his victim being a "nubile teen," you've already lost.

Also, your theory is wrong because the story has gained enormous PR traction in the US. The UK media only covered it because they had no choice. They certainly weren't the leaders around the issue you would expect, likely because of the BRF.

DP. Lost what? Andrew has been fired. There's not much more to do.

There needs to be a criminal investigation into Andrew's connections with human trafficking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Andrew must be so happy right now. Not a single blip of him being a child-rapist. Is there any possibility that this is partially orchestrated to for that purpose?

You think Meghan cares for Andrew?

No not at all. I just wonder if the BRF decided that they could benefit from the situation.

She has demonstrated that taking one for the team is not her thing. So I’m going to say no.

I’m not suggesting that she agreed to be pawn. I’m suggesting that BRF is using the tumultuous relationship to their advantage making it a much bigger deal then it needs to be.

Meghan ran away last week, what, Thursday? The scandal is already dying down. By this time next week it won't be headlines. Andrew will still be around. He's not going anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there any credence to the reports saying that the final straw for Harry was the photo of the Queen with Charles, William and George? It’s not like they included Camilla and the rest of the Cambridges and just left the Sussexes out.

I doubt it. That photo was designed to show a direct line of succession, which is the Queen, then Charles, then William, then George. Harry knew he's not in this sequence so why would he be upset?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any credence to the reports saying that the final straw for Harry was the photo of the Queen with Charles, William and George? It’s not like they included Camilla and the rest of the Cambridges and just left the Sussexes out.

I doubt it. That photo was designed to show a direct line of succession, which is the Queen, then Charles, then William, then George. Harry knew he's not in this sequence so why would he be upset?

It sounded odd to me too but that’s a line Tina Brown and others are pushing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any credence to the reports saying that the final straw for Harry was the photo of the Queen with Charles, William and George? It’s not like they included Camilla and the rest of the Cambridges and just left the Sussexes out.

I doubt it. That photo was designed to show a direct line of succession, which is the Queen, then Charles, then William, then George. Harry knew he's not in this sequence so why would he be upset?

There is a difference between knowing it and coming to terms with it. The shift of power is happening now, with the queen prepping to transition out and his brother calling more and more the shots. He wants to be on equal footing with his brother and it’s just starting to experience what it means to be the spare.

[Anonymous]

This thread is getting boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is getting boring.

Just wait until they provide more details of the new arrangement or Harry flies home.

[Anonymous]

This is why aristocrats ought not to mix and marry low-class commoners. Megyn’s family stock is full of backwater drama and she is personally a very flawed, money-grubbing character.

[Anonymous]

MM comes across as super tacky, shallow and desperate. She reminds me of the Bezos side piece who destroyed his marriage. I suspect MM will also become a plastic surgery addicted freak in the near term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why aristocrats ought not to mix and marry low-class commoners. Megyn’s family stock is full of backwater drama and she is personally a very flawed, money-grubbing character.

OMG either read the thread or keep your comments to yourself. Harry's high-class family currently has three cheaters, a homewrecker, and a pedophile in their ranks.

Oh and btw the future Queen is also a low-class commoner with parents who run a party supply store and were former flight attendants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is getting boring.

+1. Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why aristocrats ought not to mix and marry low-class commoners. Megyn’s family stock is full of backwater drama and she is personally a very flawed, money-grubbing character.

British aristocrats have pimped their daughters to gain favors in the king's court. Read your history. Trust me when I say that of all the people aristocrats are the ones with lowest moral standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why aristocrats ought not to mix and marry low-class commoners. Megyn’s family stock is full of backwater drama and she is personally a very flawed, money-grubbing character.

British aristocrats have pimped their daughters to gain favors in the king's court. Read your history. Trust me when I say that of all the people aristocrats are the ones with lowest moral standards.

^^this. Meghan "ran away" precisely because there was no upside to her of all the drama of the Daily Fail racist attacks on her, and all the "courtiers" out to get her/discipline her. She has no reason to want to gain favor. She has her own money, and knows she can make more; and being royal doesn't really mean that much to her (beyond I'm assuming enjoying the pomp & circumstance of the wedding iteself). She can keep ALL the status she wants from marrying Harry and deal with none of the cr*p of the BRF. Why shouldn't she? If someone could make a persuasive argument for why "royal work" is so meaningful and important, then maybe that should have been something Meghan could have stuck with. But as it is, nobody can explain what "Royal Work" is. Finally, don't forget that Meghan is an actual millenial feminist. That means that she was likely motivated in large part to get away from the pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Most of that she knew going in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hello Time Magazine - lovely to see you today

https://time.com/5765329/meghan-markle-womens-shelter-vancouver-visit/

Ha! She’s totally irrelevant now. Only dozens of press coverage from reputable sources. Bet the British ROTA are kicking themselves for being so shortsighted and stupid.

They lost the most popular member of the royal family. No amount of Will screaming “I’m going to be king someday!” is going to change that.