It makes perfect sense if you are a striker at a top flight club where both possible teams you could play on are playing in the ECNL playoffs. Say Player A is a striker on the newly formed 10-11 team and is the better player and is an Oct birthday. The kid's backup who is definitely still amazing is an Aug. misaligned kid, who would be the starter on the 11-12 team. Both teams go to showcases and the playoffs. I'm pretty sure the club coaches and college scouts will be able to figure it out with the backup playing as started by playing on age. |
And on most teams about a third typically are blank. |
You do though. As soon as a college coach figures out that an Aug birthday is playing on a grade down team red flags and alarms will go off in their head. Maybe players can overcome the red flags but its an uphill battle that doesn't need to occur. Just play up on the correct grade in school club team. |
So now you're floating that Aug birthdays will play on 2 teams at once. Again exactly what nobody wants. This is the kind of nonsense playing down invites. |
You no doubt disagree with the reality of RAE, but if youth soccer adopted your forcing up plan you'd drive more Aug-Sept players out of the sport than send to college. |
Complete speculation that goes against college coaches and what happened by BY |
No, I'm talking about what's happening and likely to happen now. You said there's no scenario where it would make sense for a top club. Here's one where it would make perfect sense to all, where a current backup on a highlevel team at a highlevel club plays on age, even if misaligned to start. Other positions, even more so, like CB or goal keeper. Think about it. |
That's what the facts say. Youngest go home, oldest play on. |
I know exactly what you're suggesting. Its one of the issues with SY. |
It's not really an issue, though. It's an opportunity for those players to start and given the visibility of these clubs which typically send multiple age groups to playoffs, likely NOT a recruiting problem. Maybe it's even a better chance for coaches to see them perform. And maybe these clubs have no choice, especially if they've got Aug-Dec kids from above joining the younger group. |
Clubs that do things like this have to be careful. Ringers or Guest Players whatever you wanr to call them piss off parents that are paying for events. I could see a situation where a club rostered an Aug birthday with their grade but played them down for tournamants. It would also make sense to roster Aug birthdays with their grade and participate in Sophmore level showcases two years in a row. |
But with these new age rules, these players aren't ringers. They are teammates. Why keep them on the bench when they can start? These top tier clubs certainly care about recruiting but they also care very much about winning. They will maximize these advantages, especially when it makes sense for the player. |
Technically players arent supposed to play more than one game per day. I realize this gets thrown out the window all the time. Its just a situation thats guaranteed to cause unneeded drama. |
Its humorous how quickly you changed from playing with your age to having no issues with players playing with their grade as long as they can play a level down now and then and beat up on the younger kids now and then. |
No, you misunderstand the example. As teams move from BY to SY, players already playing at a high level probably will be OK even if they end up misaligned, especially if those teams are already still going to the ECNL playoffs. Here's an even more stark example: Say 2010 Oct star striker moves to the 10-11 team. The 2011 Aug misaligned star striker moves to the 11-12 team. Both still playing at the highest level of ECNL, both still getting seen by scouts. Both still starting and building their highlight reel. |