Twitter fingers runth cold |
Any idea on BRYC 07s score? |
Agree! |
He needs to accept responsibility for the fcv decline in both technical development and reputation. Puppione has ruined a lot of opportunities for a lot of kids. |
|
Well FCV can always force their players to do hundreds of hours of techne futbol.
That's where the players actually get their development from, not the coaching |
| How has BP ruined opportunities for kids? From outside the club it seems as though players are committing to good schools |
3-0 FCV |
| People seem to love to put BP down but he is an excellent coach Ruth top notch college contacts. It’s true. |
Can you please elaborate on where, what, or how is exactly Ryan and O’Hara developing on their side of the aisle? their ECNL performances aren’t something to boast about. Their turnover is increasing yearly. And dropping fees in the middle of rona times as a way to retain is a mediocre’s man move. |
You are correct that possession and SOG are different. FCV dominated both. |
Doesn’t appear so. It was a tie game. Shots on goal means nothing. It’s the shots that actually make it in the goal that matter. |
send it to instat, lets see. |
|
BRYC played not to lose. Crowded the back and scored in the second half when FCV was gassed.
This is FCV’s first tune up and beginning to get back their fitness. This game in 2-3 week’s wouldn’t be close. |
I think this post sums up the difference in ECNL and FCV. FCV only cares about the score, not how well the team possesses or how many opportunities or shots on goal the team has. FCV truly believes shots on goal mean nothing. That’s their culture. It’s not about player development. It is why FCV will never get ECNL. |
Lol. No one has been playing. Do you think BRYC kids have been running around conditioning? Fact is, 06 is the future of FCV and they tied an 0-6 team. The FCV came out with a 2-1 win....again...against an 0-6 team. To me, it looks like BRYC is trending upwards and FCV not so much. |