
Oh my goodness. Have you listened to yourself? What utter bald faced snobbery. I guess as a soon to be TPMS magnet parent from the East side of the county who works for a non profit my child is evidence that this magnet program is dumbed down. No matter that my kid has been an outlier since the age of three, that he’s several grade levels above his peers, that he scores 99th percentile on everything, that he’s miserable and unchallenged at school and this magnet program seems to be just what he needs. This program seems designed for a kid who was working on algebra in 3rd grade and who taught himself to read at 3. But his parents work for non profits and he never prepped for the test and doesn’t do expensive math enrichment programs (none of which I’ve ever heard of btw before this thread) so I guess he’s not worthy of the program like your Bethesda born children with all the advantages. I can’t imagine him being interested in math competitions either because he’s not obnoxiously competitive. |
Congratulations on admission. So glad your DC will have more classes at , or at least near, his learning level. Maybe just don't read any of these threads for your own sanity. The new screening process is broader and finds more gems. Some schools that had a (recent) history of sending a large percentage on to TPMS magnet had that change dramatically with the institution of peer cohort. Though they then got classes that could skip a year or more of math. It is a giant factory like school system. More kids are receiving better matched classes than under the pre cohort system. That is, as expected by many, becoming less so each year as MCPS or the individual schools keep broadening the effective definition of cohort. |
Welcome, fellow soon-to-be-TPMS-magnet-parent. If it makes you feel better, I work for a nonprofit AND my 'magnet kid' is being raised in a single parent home. I hope your child loves the program at TPMS, and maybe we'll meet at a back to school event and give each other a secret high sign as fellow nonprofit idiots who don't value our kids' educations. |
I’ll look out for you! Hopefully the rest of the magnet parents will be like us and not like the bitter snobs on this thread who are likely slamming the program because their kids didn’t make the cut. |
eh.. some of us aren't bitter snobs, but just concerned about the direction of magnets. My kid didn't bother applying to MS magnet 4 years ago, so before the peer cohort criteria. Too far. And I don't live in a W cluster. |
You make too much sense. By the way I agree with you. |
The school that used to send all those kids every year happens to be the same school that has a bus that takes kids to Dr. Li's every day for prep classes. It's fine that these kids work so hard, but one goal of the new admissions process was to find gems as you say and a big part of that was to reduce the impact prep had on admissions since it made averages kids seem gifted and many gifted kids were overlooked.. A big part of this debate is the parents from those schools feel entitled. They were used to gaming the system and now rail against the changes since they can no longer assure admission by taking prep classes. |
Stop worrying then all the data indicates they're admitting the best and brightest some of which had less prep than in years past. By the time these kids are in 8th, it should be evident, but these parents will have something new to complain about like the boundary analysis.. |
A concrete example is Blair vs TJ. In every possible academic match Blair SMCS destroys them year after year after year. |
In that case why do you care? The kid who get in are all deserving of their places and all highly gifted. There is no change in “direction”. |
These math contests are popular among kids who have parents pushing them into contest math. The majority of bright math kids are not interested. They will bloom later on when it actually means something.
Signed, parent of middle schooler who excels at aops and isn’t competing. |
I don’t get all the posters who are “concerned for the magnets.” Don’t the magnets exist to serve kids, not the other way around? It seems totally reasonable to me to use the magnets to serve kids who couldn’t otherwise be served by their home schools.
Imagine it was possible to evaluate the scores - on whatever metric - for the combined group of kids who were admitted to TPMS under the new admission criteria as well as those who would have been admitted under the old process. Wouldn’t you call it a success if that combined group did better now, even if the TPMS part of that group scored marginally lower? |
This tread rivals the Sidwell v GDS tread on the private school forum. |
Some posts on dcum say a school is back to 40% admission as a result of success with appeals. That would particularily make sense if as others suggest more people decline admission under universal screening and people initially put on waitlist dont have the same opportunity as rejected (for cohort reasons)'folks have to add to their DC record via appeal process. |
You need some better reading comprehension skills. I bolded "why do I care" for you. Of course there is a change in direction if the students who are being admitted on not the best and brightest in the district, but rather just in their home schools. |