Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Here's an explanation of the document...that's longer than the released document. NYT worked fast on this one.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/trump-transcript.html

[Anonymous]

Trump is now on the record that the Crowdstrike server is in Ukraine and alleged corruption.

Interesting. Conspiracy theorists will go nuts over that admission.

[Anonymous]

"I am not sure if this is a quid pro quo or not." - Chairman Schiff

He calls this call a shakedown that violates his oath of offense.

Shorter: We have no idea why we are impeaching but, we are.

Meanwhile, wasn't Putin pissed when the Ukraine turned to the EU in the first place so he grabbed Crimea? Having this cordial working relationship with the US must really piss off Putin. Doesn't this conversation vindicate the president as not working as a puppet for Putin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Several Senate Republicans I've spoken with in the last hour are stunned that the WH is releasing this transcript. They do not think it helps the president's cause. And they expect today's Senate GOP lunch to be quite the get-together.

-Robert Costa

That's exactly what I felt - if they released this transcript as a defense against the Whistleblowers full complain - imagine what that whole would be like...

[Anonymous]

*Office not offense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I am not sure if this is a quid pro quo or not." - Chairman Schiff

He calls this call a shakedown that violates his oath of offense.

Shorter: We have no idea why we are impeaching but, we are.

Meanwhile, wasn't Putin pissed when the Ukraine turned to the EU in the first place so he grabbed Crimea? Having this cordial working relationship with the US must really piss off Putin. Doesn't this conversation vindicate the president as not working as a puppet for Putin?

No. Got the money from Russia via the NRA, now can hold up already approved funds to Ukraine to help Russia (after giving Russia the names of US spies) while trying to bribe Ukraine to get involved in the election. Win win all the round, definitely under Putin's control as much as ever.

[Anonymous]

I we can pay multiple people to sit in on the call and transcribe it, why can't we just record it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff is trying his damndest to spin this in the Democrat's favor.

It won't work and makes the Democrats look even more desperate.

Exactly. He’s nothing but a pathetic drama queen.

I’d be so embarrassed if schiff was a republican. What an absolute moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I am not sure if this is a quid pro quo or not." - Chairman Schiff

He calls this call a shakedown that violates his oath of offense.

Shorter: We have no idea why we are impeaching but, we are.

Meanwhile, wasn't Putin pissed when the Ukraine turned to the EU in the first place so he grabbed Crimea? Having this cordial working relationship with the US must really piss off Putin. Doesn't this conversation vindicate the president as not working as a puppet for Putin?

Yep. They trotted out Schiff to try to clean up the mess they made.
I am interested in hearing from those moderate Dems who have been reluctant to utter the word, "impeachment."
My bet is that they are not too happy today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff is trying his damndest to spin this in the Democrat's favor.

It won't work and makes the Democrats look even more desperate.

Exactly. He’s nothing but a pathetic drama queen.

I’d be so embarrassed if schiff was a republican. What an absolute moron.

Republicans have massive things to be embarrassed about now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I we can pay multiple people to sit in on the call and transcribe it, why can't we just record it?

Nicol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I we can pay multiple people to sit in on the call and transcribe it, why can't we just record it?

Nicol

Nixon, dumb ass big tech autocorrect

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"I am not sure if this is a quid pro quo or not." - Chairman Schiff

He calls this call a shakedown that violates his oath of offense.

Shorter: We have no idea why we are impeaching but, we are.

Meanwhile, wasn't Putin pissed when the Ukraine turned to the EU in the first place so he grabbed Crimea? Having this cordial working relationship with the US must really piss off Putin. Doesn't this conversation vindicate the president as not working as a puppet for Putin?

No. Got the money from Russia via the NRA, now can hold up already approved funds to Ukraine to help Russia (after giving Russia the names of US spies) while trying to bribe Ukraine to get involved in the election. Win win all the round, definitely under Putin's control as much as ever.

Next time you respond to me, use facts and specific violations not this pie in the sky narrative.. Your narrative and those like you are leading the public over the cliff edge like lemmings.

[Anonymous]

How come there isn't an actual recording of the conversation?
Isn't that required by law?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How come there isn't an actual recording of the conversation?
Isn't that required by law?

They stopped recording Presidential conversations in the 70s for security reasons.