Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, FFS. Evidence? They have charged him with process crimes. He has stated numerous times that he thought he would be indicted. If he was going to destroy evidence, he would have done it long before today.
The dramatic arrest does not add up. Mueller, et al are acting like A$$holes.

Wait, Mueller et al are acting like a$$holes, but the person who lied to Congress, hid evidence from Congress and Mueller only to turn them over to the media and who threatened dog is a very fine person?

And that doesn't even touch the potential of conspiring with Wikileaks (aka Russia) and Donald Trump against the voters of the United States of America.

Shocking that people are defending a criminal.

If the GOP didn’t defend the criminals they wouldn’t have anyone left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even the Nixon Library is disassociating itself from Stone.

That is low.

Harsh.

Someone needs to tell Stone the Nixon victory gesture isn't the best look for someone trying to maintain his innocence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even the Nixon Library is disassociating itself from Stone.

That is low.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the Nixon Library is disassociating itself from Stone.

That is low.

Link?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/nixon-foundation-disowns-roger-stone-calling-him-a-nixon-campaign-aide-or-adviser-is-a-gross-misstatement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK. If there is evidence he should be charged. Fair enough. But please tell me -- Why get him at 6 am, why put a chain around his waist in addition to handcuffs, why take him out in his pajamas without giving him a chance to change clothes? I feel like calling the FBI to complain.

And CNN's camera is rolling ...

This is how Soviet Union or North Korea deal with their political dissidents. Shameful.

I agree. He is such a dangerous criminal that he was released with a $250,000 signature bond - meaning he had to pay no money.
I thought liberals did not like the militarization of police. I guess it's ok when it is a 66 YO white man who is no flight risk and doesn't own a handgun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN has video of the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s house. It’s like they are taking down El Chapo!

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1088769400994480128?s=21

Why all the agents, long guns, etc?
Is Stone a flight risk? Did they expect him to resist?

This was a show. The SC overdid this one.

(1) risk of destroying evidence if given heads up on arrest, (2) risk of Stone being armed and shooting agents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK. If there is evidence he should be charged. Fair enough. But please tell me -- Why get him at 6 am, why put a chain around his waist in addition to handcuffs, why take him out in his pajamas without giving him a chance to change clothes? I feel like calling the FBI to complain.

And CNN's camera is rolling ...

This is how Soviet Union or North Korea deal with their political dissidents. Shameful.

I agree. He is such a dangerous criminal that he was released with a $250,000 signature bond - meaning he had to pay no money.
I thought liberals did not like the militarization of police. I guess it's ok when it is a 66 YO white man who is no flight risk and doesn't own a handgun.

We don't like, but why do you only complain if it's a white man? And what's with the specious comparisons to the Soviet Union or North Korea? When people are arrested in those places, you never see them again. I heard Stone is going on TV tonight. Can you name a time that happened in the history of the Soviet Union or North Korea?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN has video of the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s house. It’s like they are taking down El Chapo!

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1088769400994480128?s=21

Why all the agents, long guns, etc?
Is Stone a flight risk? Did they expect him to resist?

This was a show. The SC overdid this one.

(1) risk of destroying evidence if given heads up on arrest, (2) risk of Stone being armed and shooting agents

You are reaching, Seriously.

Destroying evidence? He has been saying for months that he expected to be indicted. The FBI has been looking at his text messages, phone calls, and emails for 2 years. If he was going to destroy evidence - he would have done it long ago. The only risk of being alerted is if CNN said something.
And, Stone shooting someone? He doesn't own a gun. Somehow, I think the FBI knows this.

It was a show. Even reasonable liberals admit it was over the top. Intimidation? Probably. But, it isn't a good look for the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN has video of the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s house. It’s like they are taking down El Chapo!

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1088769400994480128?s=21

Why all the agents, long guns, etc?
Is Stone a flight risk? Did they expect him to resist?

This was a show. The SC overdid this one.

(1) risk of destroying evidence if given heads up on arrest, (2) risk of Stone being armed and shooting agents

You are reaching, Seriously.

Destroying evidence? He has been saying for months that he expected to be indicted. The FBI has been looking at his text messages, phone calls, and emails for 2 years. If he was going to destroy evidence - he would have done it long ago. The only risk of being alerted is if CNN said something.
And, Stone shooting someone? He doesn't own a gun. Somehow, I think the FBI knows this.

It was a show. Even reasonable liberals admit it was over the top. Intimidation? Probably. But, it isn't a good look for the FBI.

<—- When you reach so hard you throw your back out.

Roger Stone is a criminal. Criminals get arrested. Boo fricken hoo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the Nixon Library is disassociating itself from Stone.

That is low.

Link?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/nixon-foundation-disowns-roger-stone-calling-him-a-nixon-campaign-aide-or-adviser-is-a-gross-misstatement

according to FBI files he WAS involved in the nixon scandal. Poor Nixon foundation....

https://twitter.com/altNOAA/status/1088956644048936961

also NY Times article
https://www.nytimes.com/1973/07/22/archives/dirty-tricks.html

[Anonymous]

My spouse, ex-FBI, said, IRT the way the arrest went down....."This is an embarrassment for the FBI."
There should have been an ADIC, minimum, present for the arrest. He/She should have told CNN to get the F&*k out of there. But they didn't. Why? Because they wanted them to film it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN has video of the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s house. It’s like they are taking down El Chapo!

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1088769400994480128?s=21

Why all the agents, long guns, etc?
Is Stone a flight risk? Did they expect him to resist?

This was a show. The SC overdid this one.

(1) risk of destroying evidence if given heads up on arrest, (2) risk of Stone being armed and shooting agents

You are reaching, Seriously.

Destroying evidence? He has been saying for months that he expected to be indicted. The FBI has been looking at his text messages, phone calls, and emails for 2 years. If he was going to destroy evidence - he would have done it long ago. The only risk of being alerted is if CNN said something.
And, Stone shooting someone? He doesn't own a gun. Somehow, I think the FBI knows this.

It was a show. Even reasonable liberals admit it was over the top. Intimidation? Probably. But, it isn't a good look for the FBI.

I think people who commit treason should be arrested. I am a reasonable person. Over the top? HA! Good one.

Why don't you worry about why he was arrested and not how he was arrested? I mean, is that really your priority???

Lying to congress: nbd.
Treason: nbd.
They brought armed agents to arrest him: THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My spouse, ex-FBI, said, IRT the way the arrest went down....."This is an embarrassment for the FBI."
There should have been an ADIC, minimum, present for the arrest. He/She should have told CNN to get the F&*k out of there. But they didn't. Why? Because they wanted them to film it.

Didn’t you post this verbatim above? And like DC FBI or the NYFO ex-FBI? Like Giuliani NYFO leakers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My spouse, ex-FBI, said, IRT the way the arrest went down....."This is an embarrassment for the FBI."
There should have been an ADIC, minimum, present for the arrest. He/She should have told CNN to get the F&*k out of there. But they didn't. Why? Because they wanted them to film it.

Gee, do you think it could be to put pressure on him & the people who haven't yet been arrested so he makes a deal and they all go down for treason? Just maybe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My spouse, ex-FBI, said, IRT the way the arrest went down....."This is an embarrassment for the FBI."
There should have been an ADIC, minimum, present for the arrest. He/She should have told CNN to get the F&*k out of there. But they didn't. Why? Because they wanted them to film it.

Your spouse is the one who cheered as his former colleagues missed paychecks? How generous of him.