Aww I feel so bad that you can’t buy your way through life anymore. |
Well, when people made the decision to buy a house somewhere with a top school system or to commit to a top private school, they figured it would be helpful in terms of taking the kid to the next level of educational attainment. They didn’t realize it would be the equivalent of an educational curse. So the parents who actually didn’t really care about education and plopped their kids in a mediocre school system are the ones whose kids are getting the better opportunities with their fake 4.0s. Seems unfair. |
You can’t buy everything in life anymore, your kid actually has to compete. |
This has got to be satire. You think that people could just put their kids in “top school districts” if “only they cared about education”? |
To whom much is given, much is expected. |
You know what you're missing? People worked their butts off to buy homes in these areas because they prioritized educational achievement. I don't see why the kid in the great school system should be penalized versus the kid in the okay school system. |
"Given?" I think the word is "earned." But keep living off of other people's handouts and unfair advantages because of "the system." |
Yes, “given.” The kids didn’t earn squat. |
Because buying a more expensive house doesn’t actually mean your kid is more meritorious than the kid who grew up in an apartment. |
We try to judge kids on their own merits given that they don’t choose who they’re born to. The single parent who works 2 jobs to put food on the table is absolutely working their butt off. |
Translation: you played the game the best way you could. Someone else played the game the best way they could. You thought you would win and your style of play was better, but you lost. And because you never thought you could lose it seems unfair. |
Penalized? This kid has been given way more opportunities to distinguish themself because of their zip code. |
I'm a little surprised that a parent of a kid at a rigorous DC private thought that a 3.2 was sufficient to get past the pre-read. When my DD was a sophomore but playing on a club team comprised mostly of juniors b/c of birth date attended a lot of team meet and greets with coaches. They were all quite clear that they wanted top student-athletes not athletes. One of her team members tried to make an argument that her curriculum was more rigorous so that should count for something with her GPA. Yeah, the coach let her know that meant nothing to him. |
Cool anecdote. This was not that case. Both coach and school college counselor--plus data from Naviance--showed the GPA in the lower end of the range. Again, if you don't have a kid at one of these schools and don't have access to the data, you really don't know what you're talking about. Thanks though. Cool story. |
I don’t know, it’s like a grade in AP AB Calc being considered equivalent to BC Calc. If you can’t identify the unfairness in this, I don’t know what to say. |