Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not just donate the money you spent on gas for this photo op to the shelter and actually do some good

Can you split that $ with an environmental group to offset the impact of her flight?

So are they going to settle in a location that will require a flight every time the want to leave their neighborhood?

Many areas in Canada require a flight to leave the neighbour hood.

While that may be true, people who plan to maintain the life they do shouldn’t be bound to such a means of transportation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hear Sunshine Sachs is no longer representing Harry and Meghan. Wonder what that means? This will be their 5th PR change in 2 years. Not a good look when their PR is still consistently a disaster, but I’m sure it’s just because the British media has it out for them LOL!

MM burning another bridge. Seems she’s burned every bridge in her life over 40 years. Someone should tell her to look in the mirror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not just donate the money you spent on gas for this photo op to the shelter and actually do some good

Because her appearance can raise several thousand times that.

I’m sure the organization prefers the media goodwill and associated donations than simply getting a one time gift of a $100. Plus it’s incredible awareness and outreach to get the word out about their services.

An added benefit is letting these women feel heard by someone like Meghan.

What does that accomplish?

Be honest here. It doesn't change anything. No one remembers those women. It doesn't change any public policy or funding. No one will really remember that Meghan visited the charity. It'll be forgotten in a day when she moves on to her next photo op.

I do think there's a weirdness in thinking some grand lady can sweep in and somehow make everything better even though the only thing she does is just sweeping in for photos and then leaving.

At least with someone like the Queen or the First Lady or spouse of any head of state, the visits are official representatives of the state and symbolic, but Meghan is no longer representing anything other than herself. What that accomplishes, I have no idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Sunshine Sachs is no longer representing Harry and Meghan. Wonder what that means? This will be their 5th PR change in 2 years. Not a good look when their PR is still consistently a disaster, but I’m sure it’s just because the British media has it out for them LOL!

MM burning another bridge. Seems she’s burned every bridge in her life over 40 years. Someone should tell her to look in the mirror.

She’s very pretty. I’m sure she’s pleased when she looks in the mirror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Sunshine Sachs is no longer representing Harry and Meghan. Wonder what that means? This will be their 5th PR change in 2 years. Not a good look when their PR is still consistently a disaster, but I’m sure it’s just because the British media has it out for them LOL!

MM burning another bridge. Seems she’s burned every bridge in her life over 40 years. Someone should tell her to look in the mirror.

I just don't see how the MM sycophants can discount the fact that numerous professional AMERICAN PR firms keep dropping this couple. How can that possibly be tied in to some conspiracy with the British media? It's clearly a result of their personal actions. Tthese are well-regarded, successful PR firms that seem to be able to manage relationships with several other high-profile stars yet for some reason Harry and MM seem to be completely unmanageable. What say you MM stans?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Sunshine Sachs is no longer representing Harry and Meghan. Wonder what that means? This will be their 5th PR change in 2 years. Not a good look when their PR is still consistently a disaster, but I’m sure it’s just because the British media has it out for them LOL!

MM burning another bridge. Seems she’s burned every bridge in her life over 40 years. Someone should tell her to look in the mirror.

She's 38, will be 39 in August.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So there are no women’s shelters in the U.K.?

Plenty. What there isn't in Canada - a hateful U.K. media and palace courtiers insisting Meghan stop 'doing so much' because Kate can't keep up.

I'm not sure how impressed Canadians are with royalty compared to Brits. She's just the same as any other wealthy person, in Canada. Right now she's interesting but soon enough the excitement will fade and she'll be just another rich American temporarily living in Canada.

I swear I remember reading this word for word just before the wedding - though I believe the phrase was 'they're newlyweds and soon the focus will be back on the others'.

Meanwhile Meghan gained 10 million Instagram followers in 6 months - is about to hit 11.8 million today and umm...is the most photographed woman in the world alongside the still most popular member of the royal family - her husband.

And Archie...the world goes crazy when they see him. I can't imagine what will happen when he can actually walk.

Um. I'd need to see credible sources that she's the most photographed woman in the world (really? My, fancy that. More photographed than, say, Michelle Obama, or the Queen herself). OR that her husband is the most popular member of the royal family? Meghan hasn't made much splash in the US celebrity press, no more than a bunch of other hollywood stars and starlets.

There was a link to a poll early on in this thread showing Harry's popularity well below that of the Queen and his brother.

I think you're just convinced in your little world that Harry and Meghan are this amazing couple and everyone is out to get them.

Every poll from various organizations for years has consistently shown Harry as the most popular member of the royal family, followed by the queen and the rest of the family. This has been consistent over time and all sorts of polling methodologies.

You found ONE poll by one of the news organizations that Harry is suing that shows he’s no longer the most popular royal. ONE poll - and consider the source..

You’re REALLY reaching.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So there are no women’s shelters in the U.K.?

Plenty. What there isn't in Canada - a hateful U.K. media and palace courtiers insisting Meghan stop 'doing so much' because Kate can't keep up.

I'm not sure how impressed Canadians are with royalty compared to Brits. She's just the same as any other wealthy person, in Canada. Right now she's interesting but soon enough the excitement will fade and she'll be just another rich American temporarily living in Canada.

I swear I remember reading this word for word just before the wedding - though I believe the phrase was 'they're newlyweds and soon the focus will be back on the others'.

Meanwhile Meghan gained 10 million Instagram followers in 6 months - is about to hit 11.8 million today and umm...is the most photographed woman in the world alongside the still most popular member of the royal family - her husband.

And Archie...the world goes crazy when they see him. I can't imagine what will happen when he can actually walk.

Um. I'd need to see credible sources that she's the most photographed woman in the world (really? My, fancy that. More photographed than, say, Michelle Obama, or the Queen herself). OR that her husband is the most popular member of the royal family? Meghan hasn't made much splash in the US celebrity press, no more than a bunch of other hollywood stars and starlets.

There was a link to a poll early on in this thread showing Harry's popularity well below that of the Queen and his brother.

I think you're just convinced in your little world that Harry and Meghan are this amazing couple and everyone is out to get them.

Every poll from various organizations for years has consistently shown Harry as the most popular member of the royal family, followed by the queen and the rest of the family. This has been consistent over time and all sorts of polling methodologies.

You found ONE poll by one of the news organizations that Harry is suing that shows he’s no longer the most popular royal. ONE poll - and consider the source..

You’re REALLY reaching.

Uh... show me the polls.

And you know, polls do change. Someone is popular one year, not so popular next year.

I know you're feeling hurt that somehow the magic of Meghan and Harry isn't turning out what you envisioned it when you fell in love with the couple's fairy tale story and that their future is going to be b-list celebs without much of a purpose and maybe even hawking cheap makeup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Sunshine Sachs is no longer representing Harry and Meghan. Wonder what that means? This will be their 5th PR change in 2 years. Not a good look when their PR is still consistently a disaster, but I’m sure it’s just because the British media has it out for them LOL!

MM burning another bridge. Seems she’s burned every bridge in her life over 40 years. Someone should tell her to look in the mirror.

I just don't see how the MM sycophants can discount the fact that numerous professional AMERICAN PR firms keep dropping this couple. How can that possibly be tied in to some conspiracy with the British media? It's clearly a result of their personal actions. Tthese are well-regarded, successful PR firms that seem to be able to manage relationships with several other high-profile stars yet for some reason Harry and MM seem to be completely unmanageable. What say you MM stans?

You keep posting about this but I don't see this anywhere? Links? Sources?

Oh that's right - you have none. Fake news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not just donate the money you spent on gas for this photo op to the shelter and actually do some good

Because her appearance can raise several thousand times that.

I’m sure the organization prefers the media goodwill and associated donations than simply getting a one time gift of a $100. Plus it’s incredible awareness and outreach to get the word out about their services.

An added benefit is letting these women feel heard by someone like Meghan.

What does that accomplish?

Be honest here. It doesn't change anything. No one remembers those women. It doesn't change any public policy or funding. No one will really remember that Meghan visited the charity. It'll be forgotten in a day when she moves on to her next photo op.

I do think there's a weirdness in thinking some grand lady can sweep in and somehow make everything better even though the only thing she does is just sweeping in for photos and then leaving.

At least with someone like the Queen or the First Lady or spouse of any head of state, the visits are official representatives of the state and symbolic, but Meghan is no longer representing anything other than herself. What that accomplishes, I have no idea.

I used to work in nonprofit development.

Believe me these organizations are benefiting greatly from her visit. That women’s organization is getting nationwide - and worldwide - coverage. That translates into more visibility for their target demographic AND it translates into a huge bump in donations. That’s the reality of how nonprofit fundraising works.

[Anonymous]

This latest stunt just looks desperate and slightly unhinged. She wanted privacy, ok, so take it. Don’t stage a transparent attempt to play the princess in Canada.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So there are no women’s shelters in the U.K.?

Plenty. What there isn't in Canada - a hateful U.K. media and palace courtiers insisting Meghan stop 'doing so much' because Kate can't keep up.

I'm not sure how impressed Canadians are with royalty compared to Brits. She's just the same as any other wealthy person, in Canada. Right now she's interesting but soon enough the excitement will fade and she'll be just another rich American temporarily living in Canada.

I swear I remember reading this word for word just before the wedding - though I believe the phrase was 'they're newlyweds and soon the focus will be back on the others'.

Meanwhile Meghan gained 10 million Instagram followers in 6 months - is about to hit 11.8 million today and umm...is the most photographed woman in the world alongside the still most popular member of the royal family - her husband.

And Archie...the world goes crazy when they see him. I can't imagine what will happen when he can actually walk.

Um. I'd need to see credible sources that she's the most photographed woman in the world (really? My, fancy that. More photographed than, say, Michelle Obama, or the Queen herself). OR that her husband is the most popular member of the royal family? Meghan hasn't made much splash in the US celebrity press, no more than a bunch of other hollywood stars and starlets.

There was a link to a poll early on in this thread showing Harry's popularity well below that of the Queen and his brother.

I think you're just convinced in your little world that Harry and Meghan are this amazing couple and everyone is out to get them.

Every poll from various organizations for years has consistently shown Harry as the most popular member of the royal family, followed by the queen and the rest of the family. This has been consistent over time and all sorts of polling methodologies.

You found ONE poll by one of the news organizations that Harry is suing that shows he’s no longer the most popular royal. ONE poll - and consider the source..

You’re REALLY reaching.

Uh... show me the polls.

And you know, polls do change. Someone is popular one year, not so popular next year.

I know you're feeling hurt that somehow the magic of Meghan and Harry isn't turning out what you envisioned it when you fell in love with the couple's fairy tale story and that their future is going to be b-list celebs without much of a purpose and maybe even hawking cheap makeup.

You’re putting a lot of weight in one poll...

It has nothing to do with wishful thinking, it has to do with understanding basic math and statistics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So there are no women’s shelters in the U.K.?

Plenty. What there isn't in Canada - a hateful U.K. media and palace courtiers insisting Meghan stop 'doing so much' because Kate can't keep up.

I'm not sure how impressed Canadians are with royalty compared to Brits. She's just the same as any other wealthy person, in Canada. Right now she's interesting but soon enough the excitement will fade and she'll be just another rich American temporarily living in Canada.

I swear I remember reading this word for word just before the wedding - though I believe the phrase was 'they're newlyweds and soon the focus will be back on the others'.

Meanwhile Meghan gained 10 million Instagram followers in 6 months - is about to hit 11.8 million today and umm...is the most photographed woman in the world alongside the still most popular member of the royal family - her husband.

And Archie...the world goes crazy when they see him. I can't imagine what will happen when he can actually walk.

Um. I'd need to see credible sources that she's the most photographed woman in the world (really? My, fancy that. More photographed than, say, Michelle Obama, or the Queen herself). OR that her husband is the most popular member of the royal family? Meghan hasn't made much splash in the US celebrity press, no more than a bunch of other hollywood stars and starlets.

There was a link to a poll early on in this thread showing Harry's popularity well below that of the Queen and his brother.

I think you're just convinced in your little world that Harry and Meghan are this amazing couple and everyone is out to get them.

Every poll from various organizations for years has consistently shown Harry as the most popular member of the royal family, followed by the queen and the rest of the family. This has been consistent over time and all sorts of polling methodologies.

You found ONE poll by one of the news organizations that Harry is suing that shows he’s no longer the most popular royal. ONE poll - and consider the source..

You’re REALLY reaching.

Uh... show me the polls.

And you know, polls do change. Someone is popular one year, not so popular next year.

I know you're feeling hurt that somehow the magic of Meghan and Harry isn't turning out what you envisioned it when you fell in love with the couple's fairy tale story and that their future is going to be b-list celebs without much of a purpose and maybe even hawking cheap makeup.

You’re putting a lot of weight in one poll...

It has nothing to do with wishful thinking, it has to do with understanding basic math and statistics.

But you still aren't showing us anything, are you? Because you really can't, can you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not just donate the money you spent on gas for this photo op to the shelter and actually do some good

Can you split that $ with an environmental group to offset the impact of her flight?

So are they going to settle in a location that will require a flight every time the want to leave their neighborhood?

Many areas in Canada require a flight to leave the neighbour hood.

Many? Really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So there are no women’s shelters in the U.K.?

Plenty. What there isn't in Canada - a hateful U.K. media and palace courtiers insisting Meghan stop 'doing so much' because Kate can't keep up.

I'm not sure how impressed Canadians are with royalty compared to Brits. She's just the same as any other wealthy person, in Canada. Right now she's interesting but soon enough the excitement will fade and she'll be just another rich American temporarily living in Canada.

I swear I remember reading this word for word just before the wedding - though I believe the phrase was 'they're newlyweds and soon the focus will be back on the others'.

Meanwhile Meghan gained 10 million Instagram followers in 6 months - is about to hit 11.8 million today and umm...is the most photographed woman in the world alongside the still most popular member of the royal family - her husband.

And Archie...the world goes crazy when they see him. I can't imagine what will happen when he can actually walk.

Um. I'd need to see credible sources that she's the most photographed woman in the world (really? My, fancy that. More photographed than, say, Michelle Obama, or the Queen herself). OR that her husband is the most popular member of the royal family? Meghan hasn't made much splash in the US celebrity press, no more than a bunch of other hollywood stars and starlets.

There was a link to a poll early on in this thread showing Harry's popularity well below that of the Queen and his brother.

I think you're just convinced in your little world that Harry and Meghan are this amazing couple and everyone is out to get them.

Every poll from various organizations for years has consistently shown Harry as the most popular member of the royal family, followed by the queen and the rest of the family. This has been consistent over time and all sorts of polling methodologies.

You found ONE poll by one of the news organizations that Harry is suing that shows he’s no longer the most popular royal. ONE poll - and consider the source..

You’re REALLY reaching.

Uh... show me the polls.

And you know, polls do change. Someone is popular one year, not so popular next year.

I know you're feeling hurt that somehow the magic of Meghan and Harry isn't turning out what you envisioned it when you fell in love with the couple's fairy tale story and that their future is going to be b-list celebs without much of a purpose and maybe even hawking cheap makeup.

You’re putting a lot of weight in one poll...

It has nothing to do with wishful thinking, it has to do with understanding basic math and statistics.

Don't forget this same poll was taken the day Harry's 'leaving senior royals duty' was announced. By a DailyFail PR firm. I'd love to see a poll the day Epstein died for Andrew or the day Trump was impeached.

So biased. Just like all the British media. Meanwhile they couldn't undo the fact that Harry has been the most popular royal for a decade on a poll run by the actual British government on an annual basis.