Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Next time the national anthem is played, every woman and girl in this country should take a knee.

[Anonymous]

He lied about Renate. He's a horrible person.

[Anonymous]

Am I the only one thought his dad was dead and that was why he was crying over his dad's calendars? His dad was there behind him! NOT DEAD!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, the dude who wanted to ask Chelsea Clinton's dad about where he ejaculated -- not for any legal purpose, but just to cause pain -- is now defending his lack of composure because he was thinking of his kids? That's awfully rich.

It is, isn’t it? He treated people like trash and now he’s upset because he’s being actually questioned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny, the part of the testimony Kavanaugh is apologizing (but not apologizing) for were his prepared remarks. I mean, I guess he thinks we are that stupid?

Can you imagine a woman saying, in the context of a contentious Senate hearing, “I am sorry I got emotional and lost my temper and said things I shouldn’t have. I was thinking about my children, my husband, and my parents”?

Also, his editorial doesn’t say he didn’t mean what he said. Just that he shouldn’t have said what he did. Most of the most partisan and outrageous conspiracy theorizing was in his prepared remarks!

Has anyone ever accused you of leading a rape gang at a job interview? Have actions of an interviewer ever caused a national uproar that resulted in death and rape threats against your children and spouse? No? Then STFU.

If you say it one more time does Candyman appear?

No, I think it’s Bloody Mary in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the vote will be moved to Sunday now. They can't afford to lose even one vote.

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1048013124031401984

The vote can be held open for a long time. Steve Daines could catch a late Saturday flight if he is needed. I think the vote will be on Saturday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yep. It’s almost like Obama has a calm, cool temperment perfect for the Supreme Court. But nooooo we get Turd Ferguson.

I pray to god that the Democratic president nominates Obama to the court in 2021.

Someone who has never practiced law, argued a case, or served as a judge?

Obama practiced law for 11 years from 1993 to 2004. He was a civil rights litigator.

[Anonymous]

OMG! His Wall Street Journal piece is pathetic!

He is so desperate for this job it is sickening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it’s actually much simpler than that. We don’t like drunks. We don’t like sexual assaulters. And, we don’t like rapists.
We also don’t like for ANYBODY to be convicted, even in the court of public opinion, when there is no hard evidence to support the accusation. And, we don’t like mobs dragging a good man’s name through the mud simply because they “believe her” even when there is unsubstantiated and uncorroborated evidence. And, we don’t like this good man’s family being a target of mocking. And, we don’t like mobs of people accosting elected officials because THEY think they have a larger 1st Amendment right to do so.

His what name? He cut his teeth dogging the Clintons, harassing the Foster family. Did you mind all that mocking he helped subject the families to? His background check for his first judgeship took 30 months and he only got pushed through at W’s personal request. He perjured himself in 2006, to say nothing of his hearing this summer. He has no good name, and it is all his own doing.

Also, there are three accusations against him. I wonder how many you’d need to begin to suspect that maybe, perhaps, possibly Brett isn’t quite so well behaved as you’d like to suspect.

One credible one would suffice. We have not seen that.

You haven’t seen Dr. Christine Blasey Ford? I envy you the tropical island you found to hide on these last few weeks.

Emotional testimony does not equal credible. A 36-year old allegation with no corroborating evidence presented is not credible. The people she claims were present all having no knowledge of the event is not credible. Her best friend stating she doesn’t know Kavanaugh is not credible. Not knowing where, when, how she got there and how she got home is not credible.

Several memory/trauma experts have weighed in on this and said that this is actually plausible. Kavanaugh supporters have chosen to ignore or dismiss the opinion of subject matter experts.

Plausible? Maybe. Tell me why nobody has come forward to say they drove her home. Tell me why none of those in attendance have any memory of the event. Tell me why Leland, her best friend at the time, doesn’t know Kavanaugh. Tell me why she could leave Leland alone with 4 boys, two of which allegedly just tried to rape/accidentally kill her. Tell me why she can remember running to the street and thinking how happy she was that she got away but was not bothered enough with thinking about how in the hell she was going to get home. Tell me why Leland and she never discussed this event after she left so abruptly.
There are just way too many holes in her story to make it credible.

Well, it is on Kavanaugh’s calendar. Besides, no one else was almost raped, why would they remember a party three decades ago? You seem not that logical.

It is NOT on his calendar. The July 1 party at Timmy’s was in Rockville—11 miles from CCC. This has been established. Her boyfriend at the time was also there. How does that fly??

Well, according to you crazies , he was the rapist.

Was at Timmy's grandmothers house that was empty...3333 Tenneyson Street, NW, about a mile from the club.

That was Mark Judge’s grandmother’s house. 1 mile from Columbia, older colonial that definitely could have had the narrow staircase, bathroom bedroom at top of stairs.

But the calendar says Timmy's.....

I know. Doesn’t mean they didn’t sneak into grandma’s house for further ski’s a different night. July 7, Columbia. We’ll never know bc Trump didn’t let the FBI investigate this stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the dude who wanted to ask Chelsea Clinton's dad about where he ejaculated -- not for any legal purpose, but just to cause pain -- is now defending his lack of composure because he was thinking of his kids? That's awfully rich.

It is, isn’t it? He treated people like trash and now he’s upset because he’s being actually questioned.

He is IRATE that anyone DARED to question him! I need to watch the samuel jackson clip again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Catching up on the day just now. So it's a given that he's going to be confirmed? Reading the last page it seems like folks are resigned to the outcome

It was a given during that Roman circus of a hearing—the original one where Kamala came off as a blabbering idiot and Cory booker had his spongebob squarepants moment. All the heat lightning since then has just illuminated how crazed for power the left is. And it’s probably set back sexual assault victim advocacy by about 70 years.

They didn't have the votes then. They don't have them now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yes, I remember the time the press ran article after article about him being a gang rapist and the Senate dragged him in for hearings and hours of testimony about sexually assaulting and gang raping women at high school parties. Obama really kept his cool in the face of all that.

It doesn’t matter. None of it matters. Kavanaugh is going to be a Supreme. And if you think he is going to forget what the rabid liberals put him and his family through you are about to get a 40 year lesson in payback.

The Republicans represent a rabid, dying white electorate and will be replaced on the Hill by Democrats who will either impeach Kavanaugh or expand and pack the Supreme Court to dilute his influence. And given Kavanaugh’s boozy lifestyle he’ll be lucky to last another 20 years before he has a heart attack.

yep yep yep THIS. They are DONE.

Hope the two of you don't represent the Democrats.

Oh they do. Just more hate toward people who disagree with them for the crime of not sharing their groupthink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post EDITORIAL BOARD - which is CONSERVATIVE and has not opposed a Supreme Court nominee since Bork (PRO Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, etc.) - comes out AGAINST JUSTICE BRETT https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.ee08885fa601

Conservative? What planet do you live on?

+1 Ha ha ha!!!

OP is correct:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hiatt

Um, no. #1:He is the editorial page editor, not the entirety of the editorial board, and NOT conservative. #2: Name one Republican they’ve endorsed for a high office recently.

Um like OP said, they have endorsed every SCOTUS nominee after Bork, including Alito, Clarence Thomas, Roberts, Gorsuch. That's.Not.Liberal.

Please share a link to just one WAPO editorial board opinion piece that you view as conservative. I'd love to read it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post EDITORIAL BOARD - which is CONSERVATIVE and has not opposed a Supreme Court nominee since Bork (PRO Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, etc.) - comes out AGAINST JUSTICE BRETT https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.ee08885fa601

Conservative? What planet do you live on?

+1 Ha ha ha!!!

OP is correct:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hiatt

Um, no. #1:He is the editorial page editor, not the entirety of the editorial board, and NOT conservative. #2: Name one Republican they’ve endorsed for a high office recently.

Um like OP said, they have endorsed every SCOTUS nominee after Bork, including Alito, Clarence Thomas, Roberts, Gorsuch. That's.Not.Liberal.

Please share a link to just one WAPO editorial board opinion piece that you view as conservative. I'd love to read it.

DP. The editorial board is pretty conservative. In the old-fashioned sense of the word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Catching up on the day just now. So it's a given that he's going to be confirmed? Reading the last page it seems like folks are resigned to the outcome

It was a given during that Roman circus of a hearing—the original one where Kamala came off as a blabbering idiot and Cory booker had his spongebob squarepants moment. All the heat lightning since then has just illuminated how crazed for power the left is. And it’s probably set back sexual assault victim advocacy by about 70 years.

Seriously, a 36 year old sexual assault allegation from a high school party? Ridiculous. Shame on Dianne Feinstein for letting the anarchists in her party drag that enfeebled misrememberer in front of a senate committee. Something happened to her perhaps, but it wasn’t Justice Kavanaugh.