Nest level lacrosse: girls

[Anonymous]

Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Awful? Wow. Quite a strong word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

They’re better than Stars Light Blue and Pride White.

[Anonymous]

Why the hate NL 28s. Geez their rising 7th and a solid team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

They’re better than Stars Light Blue and Pride White.

If that's the best you got, that's not setting the bar high.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

I’m not sure what positions you are talking about, but I’m not sure any of them would even make Pride Red and highly unlikely they’d make one the top 4 so makes perfect sense to stay put.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

I’m not sure what positions you are talking about, but I’m not sure any of them would even make Pride Red and highly unlikely they’d make one the top 4 so makes perfect sense to stay put.

The 28 Pride Red team is not good and wouldn't put them any higher than NL or Stars. Not sure who anyone thinks is a superstar on Pride Red. Same logic applies, they don't have anyone that could make a top Maryland club

[Anonymous]

NL 2029 team is very competitive in the NGLL A bracket. According to their coach, they are committed to this team playing in top tourneys next summer. I think NL girls program is finally getting some traction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

I’m not sure what positions you are talking about, but I’m not sure any of them would even make Pride Red and highly unlikely they’d make one the top 4 so makes perfect sense to stay put.

The 28 Pride Red team is not good and wouldn't put them any higher than NL or Stars. Not sure who anyone thinks is a superstar on Pride Red. Same logic applies, they don't have anyone that could make a top Maryland club

Agreed best 2028 Stars defender and middie have gone to Baltimore.

[Anonymous]

NL ‘29s are legit. NL ‘28s are not good. They were terrible at the Surge tournament (in a relatively uncompetitive division) and they seem to lack talent especially at midfield and on offense.

NL ‘27s might be good but they played in B Division last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next Level 28’s are awful. They should go back to B League. No wonder they cannot draw any talent.

Surprised the few talented players in the 28 team are sticking around and haven't moved on to better clubs yet.

I’m not sure what positions you are talking about, but I’m not sure any of them would even make Pride Red and highly unlikely they’d make one the top 4 so makes perfect sense to stay put.

The 28 Pride Red team is not good and wouldn't put them any higher than NL or Stars. Not sure who anyone thinks is a superstar on Pride Red. Same logic applies, they don't have anyone that could make a top Maryland club

Have not seen NL or Stars recently, but Pride would seem to have at least a couple of athletic girls that could "make" top Maryland clubs. The top Maryland clubs have several superstars per team and are pretty deep even beyond the superstars, but there is a significant drop-off in talent after the superstars. There are definitely Pride girls who could play these roles. These are the same Pride girls that will make CLC Blue in a few years.

[Anonymous]

Some of the better 27 NL's should've tried out for Pride, heard they lost a few.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of the better 27 NL's should've tried out for Pride, heard they lost a few.

Would have been interesting to see if any of them would have made it. Pride Red seems to have been a competitive team. It would have positioned them well in hopes of Capital next year as well.

[Anonymous]

I always read how Stars and Pride Red are the primary feeders for CLC Blue. Would any girls on NL ‘27 or ‘28 have a legitimate shot?