new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
1. This is not my daughter. My daughter would not wait 30 years.
2. If my daughter was unable to present details (like the date, place, time) or even state that something actually happened and confidently identify the perpetrator, I would not make accusations against someone.
3. There is a reason her parents have said they supported the confirmation of Kavanaugh.

1.
2. And I’m sure if this was your daughter, you’d do a little reading and realize that for some women the details are sketchy. Fight or flight hormones are a hell of a drug. There are actual studies on this. There are actual studies on the forgetting of sexual trauma and assault.
3. Yeah, no one ever allied with those with power and there’s certainly not a whiff of the patriarchy about that. Complete ashhat move by the dad, by the way. If my father undercut me that way, I would never speak to him again.

There is a reason she is in California. It is to the US as India was to Great Britain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?

I wish. Seems like a great guy.

#1 BK Fan Girl!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
1. This is not my daughter. My daughter would not wait 30 years.
2. If my daughter was unable to present details (like the date, place, time) or even state that something actually happened and confidently identify the perpetrator, I would not make accusations against someone.
3. There is a reason her parents have said they supported the confirmation of Kavanaugh.

1.
2. And I’m sure if this was your daughter, you’d do a little reading and realize that for some women the details are sketchy. Fight or flight hormones are a hell of a drug. There are actual studies on this. There are actual studies on the forgetting of sexual trauma and assault.
3. Yeah, no one ever allied with those with power and there’s certainly not a whiff of the patriarchy about that. Complete ashhat move by the dad, by the way. If my father undercut me that way, I would never speak to him again.

1. I know my daughter.
2. CBF's father evidently knows his daughter.

Sorry you are so jaded that you cannot possibly acknowledge inconsistencies and uncorroborated accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?

I wish. Seems like a great guy.

It seems he selects women not in the “in group,” so I can see wanting your daughter to be protected. Personally I’d keep my kids far, far away from suspected predators, but you do you.

“Suspected predator”? You sound like a disgusting person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did we find out who paid Kavanaugh's debts before confirmation?

Nope. And we never will.

Ah, one false narrative blown out of the water, so you have to fall back on the other. Too funny (and predictable).

No, it's all the same story. BK was never truly investigated. The GOP forced in a undesirable candidate because they could.

There are many undesirable justices on the Court. It is a matter of opinion who is desirable and who is not.

[Anonymous]

New York Times issues correction on Kavanaugh story

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/media/461530-new-york-times-issues-correction-on-kavanaugh-story%3famp

The New York Times on Monday added a correction to a report accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

The correction notes that the woman allegedly involved in the incident with Kavanaugh during law school does not recall it.

The Times in the story published Saturday reported a former classmate of Kavanaugh's named Max Stier said he witnessed the now-judge expose himself and force another female classmate to touch his penis at a dorm party. The Times said it corroborated the story with two other officials who had heard the same report from the former classmate, Stier.

However, the woman involved in the alleged incident did not speak to the Times and, according to the correction, her friends say she does not recall that it happened.

#fakenews
#NYSlimes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New York Times issues correction on Kavanaugh story

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/media/461530-new-york-times-issues-correction-on-kavanaugh-story%3famp

The New York Times on Monday added a correction to a report accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

The correction notes that the woman allegedly involved in the incident with Kavanaugh during law school does not recall it.

The Times in the story published Saturday reported a former classmate of Kavanaugh's named Max Stier said he witnessed the now-judge expose himself and force another female classmate to touch his penis at a dorm party. The Times said it corroborated the story with two other officials who had heard the same report from the former classmate, Stier.

However, the woman involved in the alleged incident did not speak to the Times and, according to the correction, her friends say she does not recall that it happened.

#fakenews
#NYSlimes

+1

The NYT today is not a newspaper. It's part of the Dem Party.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So did we find out who paid Kavanaugh's debts before confirmation?[/quote]

Nope. And we never will.
[/quote]

Ah, one false narrative blown out of the water, so you have to fall back on the other. Too funny (and predictable).[/quote]


No, it's all the same story. BK was never truly investigated. The GOP forced in a undesirable candidate because they could.

[/quote]

Right. Six FBI background investigations means he was never “truly investigated”.

Look, we get that you’re bitter. You didn’t get your way. But maybe you could try displaying some maturity and acknowledging that you were wrong. That plus some therapy should help you immensely. Best of luck in your recovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?

I wish. Seems like a great guy.

It seems he selects women not in the “in group,” so I can see wanting your daughter to be protected. Personally I’d keep my kids far, far away from suspected predators, but you do you.

“Suspected predator”? You sound like a disgusting person.

Parents like this are the reason women yell rape when a man looks at her cross eyed. They want their daughters to be victims so that they can put all the bad men behind bars. It is part of the ongoing feminization of our culture. All men are bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?

Dude/Dudette,

NYT runs an unverified story about a Supreme Court Justice swings and misses. The asterisk in history will be on the NYT. Please, please, please ask RBG what she thinks about this botched hit job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

Unbelievable!!

Wow. This makes the NYT look awful.

The NYT *is* awful. I was impressed to see that today’s WSJ didn’t stoop down to their level. No coverage at all of the recent idiotic claim.

Finally, threw in the towel and cancelled my NYT subscription. The WSJ stands alone for US papers. Otherwise, I will read the international
Press

[Anonymous]

Feel bad that Kavanaugh is yet again being smeared as part of a political move, but I take some solace in knowing that this helps Trump win in 2020.

I do wish that it hadn't been brought to my attention the resemblance between CBF and Garth from Wayne's World. It's all I can see anymore when I look at her picture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

+1
+1
+1

Agreed!! Liberals just don't want him there. This is nonsense being drudged up from high school & college! Many others have done FAR worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

Unbelievable!!

Wow. This makes the NYT look awful.

The NYT *is* awful. I was impressed to see that today’s WSJ didn’t stoop down to their level. No coverage at all of the recent idiotic claim.

Finally, threw in the towel and cancelled my NYT subscription. The WSJ stands alone for US papers. Otherwise, I will read the international
Press

We cancelled the NYT last year. Now read the FT and the WSJ weekend editions, both are fantastic and more than enough to keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New York Times issues correction on Kavanaugh story

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/media/461530-new-york-times-issues-correction-on-kavanaugh-story%3famp

The New York Times on Monday added a correction to a report accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

The correction notes that the woman allegedly involved in the incident with Kavanaugh during law school does not recall it.

The Times in the story published Saturday reported a former classmate of Kavanaugh's named Max Stier said he witnessed the now-judge expose himself and force another female classmate to touch his penis at a dorm party. The Times said it corroborated the story with two other officials who had heard the same report from the former classmate, Stier.

However, the woman involved in the alleged incident did not speak to the Times and, according to the correction, her friends say she does not recall that it happened.

#fakenews
#NYSlimes

So the dems here are going to ignore this? Probably. Such liars.