It’s the republican philosophy. They are always the victims, and they never bear any responsibility for their own actions. |
This is the kind of rhetoric that neither party wants. I’m a democrat and I would rather you stay in your hole as you aren’t helping. You only serve to discredit things people are working toward. |
Only this didn't start with Texas. Sure Texas' move is egregious as they did it mid-decade, but blatant partisan gerrymandering by both sides has been happening for decades. Look at CA (even before Prop 50), NY, IL, and our friends to the North in MD as examples. All ridiculously gerrymandered to favor Dems, to the point where the courts overturned MD's redistricting a few years ago. Now, in CA, prop 50 will offset Texas' 5 seats. So all of this tit for tat stuff and righteous indignation is nonsense. Stopping rigged elections by rigging more elections will not work in the long run. And in the meantime, should this amendment pass (and not be overturned in the courts), our fellow Virginians are the ones who will be disenfranchised. |
You think so? As long as the Republicans feel 100% justified in doing whatever it takes to win, while the democrats second guess themselves over whether they’re being fair and ethical enough, it’s pretty clear who has the advantage. How many times do you hear Republicans using a 2016 comment about deplorables or Obama’s divisiveness to justify their actions? democrats need to wake up and understand the playing field. Calling the Republican Party on their BS is necessary. |
Congressional Democrats have introduced bans on partisan gerrymandering, but Republicans refuse to back them. I wonder why that is! |
This is a valid criticism of Republicans. Unfortunately, this has traditionally been done by Dems bundling it in as part of much larger, very partisan pieces of legislation with no real chance of passing. The most recent (For the People Act, I believe) was actually killed by 2 Senate Democrats, not Republicans. Right or wrong, Republicans see this as a state issue and it's been supported and passed in states like Arizona, Michigan, and others, not to mention right here in Virginia. Democrats will almost certainly win the House, and have a good shot to win the Senate. They view it as a national issue so it will be interesting to see if this comes up again when they're in power. Personally, I think the closest thing to a "middle ground" solution could be a Federal mandate that all states create their own non-partisan redistricting commissions. That obviously would bring a lot of debate, especially in defining "non-partisan" (i.e is it California style, Arizona style, or something like Iowa?) but I think it's legally plausible. |
| Funny how everyone is all, wE cAn't DiSenFRanChisE VotERs, until it comes to someone with an opposing political view point. Such hypocrites. |
I don’t think we all agree that we can’t disenfranchise voters. Trump is pretty clear that he views voting as a privilege, and that he wants to pass the SAVE Act to “guarantee the midterms” for the Republicans. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03/25/voting-save-america-act-trump/ |
California already reacted to Texas redrawing their maps. |
Ok, then Virginia is reacting to Ohio, North Carolina, Missouri, and Utah redrawing their maps in 2025. |