Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People trying to excuse sexual abuse by their own religious institutions with some sick “but everyone does it” argument are truly disgusting.

Your reading comprehension is severely lacking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People trying to excuse sexual abuse by their own religious institutions with some sick “but everyone does it” argument are truly disgusting.

Your reading comprehension is severely lacking.

That particular atheist is an insane troll. Ignore her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the reason somebody is bumping ancient Christian-bashing threads to bury this thread about atheism’s sexual abuse problems?

I think maybe a religious poster who is trying to hide the fact that OP posted a thread that equates organized religion to NAMBLA.

Way to distort the whole thread, you liar you.

Touchy about the truth of that, eh? I mean OP isn’t wrong.

I’m OP and I linked to several atheists besides NAMBLA. You’re a liar.

Oh, good point. Let me correct. OP posted a thread that equates specific atheist sexual abusers and organizations that protect sexual abusers like NAMBLA to abusive priests and organized religion that protects sexual abusers. I agree both are reprehensible and I’m glad to see a religious poster equating religious organizations that protect sexual abusers to other reprehensible organizations that protect abusers.

Thanks for pointing out the correction, OP!

+1

Individuals and organizations that abuse or protect abusers suck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People trying to excuse sexual abuse by their own religious institutions with some sick “but everyone does it” argument are truly disgusting.

Yes, seems like they are trying to normalize it. WTF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People trying to excuse sexual abuse by their own religious institutions with some sick “but everyone does it” argument are truly disgusting.

Yes, seems like they are trying to normalize it. WTF?

You seem very unstable. Deliberately and repeatedly misinterpreting this thread. Last night you bumped multiple threads, some of them five years old, with inane and useless comments. Please seek help, for your own sake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People trying to excuse sexual abuse by their own religious institutions with some sick “but everyone does it” argument are truly disgusting.

Yes, seems like they are trying to normalize it. WTF?

You seem very unstable. Deliberately and repeatedly misinterpreting this thread. Last night you bumped multiple threads, some of them five years old, with inane and useless comments. Please seek help, for your own sake.

You’re sick trying to normalize sexual abuse. What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching you guys pretend that atheists who sell millions of books and run the two major US atheist orgs aren’t leaders is…I dunno, mind-boggling? Disgusting?

We already kicked out the leaders of our organization. Excommunicated. Gone. Kaput. AND they are no longer allowed in the basement of Comet Ping Pong.

Try to keep up.

Silverman got hired by a different atheist org. Dawkins and Harris are still lecturing and publishing.

We EXCOMMUNICATED them. They are no longer part of the great Atheist Organization.

We have spoken. This is the way.

We even took away their Official Atheist Arbys discount card.

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT US TO DO?!

What do The Christians do with their pervs? Nominate them to SCOTUS? We should try that next.

So is this what we should do with the atheist perverts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is the reason somebody is bumping ancient Christian-bashing threads to bury this thread about atheism’s sexual abuse problems?

Except you haven’t really proven your case there exists atheist sexual abuse problems. Also, nambla isn’t “for atheists” like the church is for “the religious”.

Also, atheists aren’t a “religion”. I think you read too much conservative media. I’ve seen the conservative articles that try to frame atheism as a religion, so they sort of better categorize it, label it and discredit it, the same way people can about organized religion. Except atheists aren’t a monolithic block like say the Catholic Church.

They’re just people who don’t believe in one of the thousands of different mainstream religions. So, no, dawkins, harris, nambla, are not good examples of people who “lead” atheism because there is no set leader like there is a pope for organized religion. You can’t pin it down so easily and it frustrates you. Atheists don’t care about your religion. They just want to be left alone from it. Organized religion, or at least many of them, have shown to harbor sexually repressed perverts. You can’t say the same about atheism because there is no repression. There are no dogmatic ideals that dictate that be “pious” and not have sex with another human like the church. That repression of sexuality leads to perversion as the multitudes of reports show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching you guys pretend that atheists who sell millions of books and run the two major US atheist orgs aren’t leaders is…I dunno, mind-boggling? Disgusting?

We already kicked out the leaders of our organization. Excommunicated. Gone. Kaput. AND they are no longer allowed in the basement of Comet Ping Pong.

Try to keep up.

Silverman got hired by a different atheist org. Dawkins and Harris are still lecturing and publishing.

We EXCOMMUNICATED them. They are no longer part of the great Atheist Organization.

We have spoken. This is the way.

We even took away their Official Atheist Arbys discount card.

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT US TO DO?!

What do The Christians do with their pervs? Nominate them to SCOTUS? We should try that next.

So is this what we should do with the atheist perverts?

What the fk are you talking about? Have you dissembled so much our frustration from being unable to prove your point that atheists are sexual perverts that this that post was supposed to be coherent?

[Anonymous]

If atheism is a religion can I become tax exempt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching you guys pretend that atheists who sell millions of books and run the two major US atheist orgs aren’t leaders is…I dunno, mind-boggling? Disgusting?

We already kicked out the leaders of our organization. Excommunicated. Gone. Kaput. AND they are no longer allowed in the basement of Comet Ping Pong.

Try to keep up.

Silverman got hired by a different atheist org. Dawkins and Harris are still lecturing and publishing.

We EXCOMMUNICATED them. They are no longer part of the great Atheist Organization.

We have spoken. This is the way.

We even took away their Official Atheist Arbys discount card.

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT US TO DO?!

What do The Christians do with their pervs? Nominate them to SCOTUS? We should try that next.

So is this what we should do with the atheist perverts?

What the fk are you talking about? Have you dissembled so much our frustration from being unable to prove your point that atheists are sexual perverts that this that post was supposed to be coherent?

We are looking to The Christians for advice on how to handle Creepy Pervs in The Atheist Organization. You have had a lot of experience.

Seems like nominating them to the SCOTUS is something you do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the reason somebody is bumping ancient Christian-bashing threads to bury this thread about atheism’s sexual abuse problems?

Except you haven’t really proven your case there exists atheist sexual abuse problems. Also, nambla isn’t “for atheists” like the church is for “the religious”.

Also, atheists aren’t a “religion”. I think you read too much conservative media. I’ve seen the conservative articles that try to frame atheism as a religion, so they sort of better categorize it, label it and discredit it, the same way people can about organized religion. Except atheists aren’t a monolithic block like say the Catholic Church.

They’re just people who don’t believe in one of the thousands of different mainstream religions. So, no, dawkins, harris, nambla, are not good examples of people who “lead” atheism because there is no set leader like there is a pope for organized religion. You can’t pin it down so easily and it frustrates you. Atheists don’t care about your religion. They just want to be left alone from it. Organized religion, or at least many of them, have shown to harbor sexually repressed perverts. You can’t say the same about atheism because there is no repression. There are no dogmatic ideals that dictate that be “pious” and not have sex with another human like the church. That repression of sexuality leads to perversion as the multitudes of reports show.

Atheists like Silverman do run atheist orgs, and Dawkins and Harris are thought leaders who sell millions of books and attract many thousands of listeners to their lectures and online videos. You can’t possibly argue they have no influence. You just can’t hide behind, “hey, they don’t represent a ‘religion’ and they don’t run actual churches, so we can ignore them.”

Also, atheists are on DCUM every hour of the day proselytizing for atheism and arguing with people of faith. If you guys didn’t proselytize, you’d have no reason to be here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching you guys pretend that atheists who sell millions of books and run the two major US atheist orgs aren’t leaders is…I dunno, mind-boggling? Disgusting?

We already kicked out the leaders of our organization. Excommunicated. Gone. Kaput. AND they are no longer allowed in the basement of Comet Ping Pong.

Try to keep up.

Silverman got hired by a different atheist org. Dawkins and Harris are still lecturing and publishing.

We EXCOMMUNICATED them. They are no longer part of the great Atheist Organization.

We have spoken. This is the way.

We even took away their Official Atheist Arbys discount card.

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT US TO DO?!

What do The Christians do with their pervs? Nominate them to SCOTUS? We should try that next.

So is this what we should do with the atheist perverts?

What the fk are you talking about? Have you dissembled so much our frustration from being unable to prove your point that atheists are sexual perverts that this that post was supposed to be coherent?

We are looking to The Christians for advice on how to handle Creepy Pervs in The Atheist Organization. You have had a lot of experience.

Seems like nominating them to the SCOTUS is something you do?

To be fair, that's better then the standard silence the victim and pretend it never happen tactic the Catholic Church, BSA, Souther Baptists, and LDS have all used

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the reason somebody is bumping ancient Christian-bashing threads to bury this thread about atheism’s sexual abuse problems?

Except you haven’t really proven your case there exists atheist sexual abuse problems. Also, nambla isn’t “for atheists” like the church is for “the religious”.

Also, atheists aren’t a “religion”. I think you read too much conservative media. I’ve seen the conservative articles that try to frame atheism as a religion, so they sort of better categorize it, label it and discredit it, the same way people can about organized religion. Except atheists aren’t a monolithic block like say the Catholic Church.

They’re just people who don’t believe in one of the thousands of different mainstream religions. So, no, dawkins, harris, nambla, are not good examples of people who “lead” atheism because there is no set leader like there is a pope for organized religion. You can’t pin it down so easily and it frustrates you. Atheists don’t care about your religion. They just want to be left alone from it. Organized religion, or at least many of them, have shown to harbor sexually repressed perverts. You can’t say the same about atheism because there is no repression. There are no dogmatic ideals that dictate that be “pious” and not have sex with another human like the church. That repression of sexuality leads to perversion as the multitudes of reports show.

Don’t waste your breath.

Multiple people have been saying this for 25+ pages but OP is too close-minded to hear any of it. Or ages just a trolling twot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the reason somebody is bumping ancient Christian-bashing threads to bury this thread about atheism’s sexual abuse problems?

Except you haven’t really proven your case there exists atheist sexual abuse problems. Also, nambla isn’t “for atheists” like the church is for “the religious”.

Also, atheists aren’t a “religion”. I think you read too much conservative media. I’ve seen the conservative articles that try to frame atheism as a religion, so they sort of better categorize it, label it and discredit it, the same way people can about organized religion. Except atheists aren’t a monolithic block like say the Catholic Church.

They’re just people who don’t believe in one of the thousands of different mainstream religions. So, no, dawkins, harris, nambla, are not good examples of people who “lead” atheism because there is no set leader like there is a pope for organized religion. You can’t pin it down so easily and it frustrates you. Atheists don’t care about your religion. They just want to be left alone from it. Organized religion, or at least many of them, have shown to harbor sexually repressed perverts. You can’t say the same about atheism because there is no repression. There are no dogmatic ideals that dictate that be “pious” and not have sex with another human like the church. That repression of sexuality leads to perversion as the multitudes of reports show.

Atheists like Silverman do run atheist orgs, and Dawkins and Harris are thought leaders who sell millions of books and attract many thousands of listeners to their lectures and online videos. You can’t possibly argue they have no influence. You just can’t hide behind, “hey, they don’t represent a ‘religion’ and they don’t run actual churches, so we can ignore them.”

Also, atheists are on DCUM every hour of the day proselytizing for atheism and arguing with people of faith. If you guys didn’t proselytize, you’d have no reason to be here.

Are there specific, I mean actual presentable evidence of cases as seen with churches, of atheist molestations that you can present or is this all anecdotal evident? Also, where did these “atheist leaders” like Harris, Dawkins specifically cover up for the abusers like in the church’s? Did Harris and Dawkins specifically review these molestation and sexual perversions, like Christian church leaders did and specifically try to discredit the accusers and for the priests accused, simply shuffle them to other parish where they could molest kids again, or they sent them into retirement, where they faced no consequence.

So beyond calling these atheist “thought leaders” (who are not actually leading or instructing a “flock” to actually do anything) perverts, where is your tangible evidence of molestation? Previous posts showed hundreds of thousands of church molestation and you produce zilch for atheist molestation other than broad accusations. I continue to be dumbfounded by the resoluteness of your, clearly, baseless assertions, but I can’t seem to stop trying to get you to actually prove something. Your posts are the informational equivalent of eating Doritos. They’re just empty calories with no nutrition.