Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea if he is guilty or innocent, I'm leaning toward guilty.

That said....ANYONE who is so righteous as to say that he was wrong to get upset is insane.

He probably can't couch is daughter's basketball team again
He probably will be a pariah for the rest of his life...people in extremely blue maryland will think he is a rapist.
He probably is fighting to stay married and to do something to get is daughter on his side.

I just think we forget these people are human.

You have no idea if he’s guilty ? Wtf are you smoking ? What innocent person wouldn’t welcome the FBI investigation ? Or even volunteer to go under a lie detector test ? Also please before hitting submit , do a little spell check . Thanks

On, Im note in high school and I dont car baout my speling
2, Guild and or Innocence is not determined by and FBI investigation
3. ANy idiot knows that lie detector tests are not admissable in cort.

Well I guess he is not just any idiot then.


According to Judge Kavanaugh:

As the Government notes, law enforcement agencies use polygraphs to test the credibility of witnesses and criminal defendants. Those agencies also use polygraphs to “screen applicants for security clearances so that they may be deemed suitable for work in critical law enforcement, defense, and intelligence collection roles.” Declaration of Alesia Y. Williams, Defense Intelligence Agency, Chief of FOIA Services Section, at Joint Appendix 226. In Morley v. CIA, we stated: “Background investigations conducted to assess an applicant’s qualification, such as … clearance and investigatory processes, inherently relate to law enforcement.” 508 F.3d 1108, 1128–29 (D.C.Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Government has satisfactorily explained how polygraph examinations serve law enforcement purposes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

At his point, I think he does remember it, or at least remembers enough to know he did it. Kavanaugh demonstrates both a contempt for women and. An inability to control anger today.

If he thought the FBI investigation would be fine, he would have asked for it, insisted on it, whatever.
He knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a conservative, I was actually thinking that Ford was a bit ditsy, but very believable. Until she implied that Leyland was mentally ill or drug addled with her cryptic comments about her health. That was the first time through all the testimony I thought Ford could be a cunning liar.

She has a physical injury that made her DH become a house husband since she is incapacitated. It's not that hard to Google it, which is how I verified what she was saying.

And that made her lie? LOL.

said no one ever

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea if he is guilty or innocent, I'm leaning toward guilty.

That said....ANYONE who is so righteous as to say that he was wrong to get upset is insane.

He probably can't couch is daughter's basketball team again
He probably will be a pariah for the rest of his life...people in extremely blue maryland will think he is a rapist.
He probably is fighting to stay married and to do something to get is daughter on his side.

I just think we forget these people are human.

You have no idea if he’s guilty ? Wtf are you smoking ? What innocent person wouldn’t welcome the FBI investigation ? Or even volunteer to go under a lie detector test ? Also please before hitting submit , do a little spell check . Thanks

On, Im note in high school and I dont car baout my speling
2, Guild and or Innocence is not determined by and FBI investigation
3. ANy idiot knows that lie detector tests are not admissable in cort.

Well I guess he is not just any idiot then.


According to Judge Kavanaugh:

As the Government notes, law enforcement agencies use polygraphs to test the credibility of witnesses and criminal defendants. Those agencies also use polygraphs to “screen applicants for security clearances so that they may be deemed suitable for work in critical law enforcement, defense, and intelligence collection roles.” Declaration of Alesia Y. Williams, Defense Intelligence Agency, Chief of FOIA Services Section, at Joint Appendix 226. In Morley v. CIA, we stated: “Background investigations conducted to assess an applicant’s qualification, such as … clearance and investigatory processes, inherently relate to law enforcement.” 508 F.3d 1108, 1128–29 (D.C.Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Government has satisfactorily explained how polygraph examinations serve law enforcement purposes.

Let me Google that for you
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=are+polygraph+tests+admissible+in+court

[Anonymous]

Machiavellian hat tip to the Democrats for moving heaven and earth to kill the appointment by any means short of murder. We have certainly reached new a new level of effort here.

There really does have to be some evidence to support a credible allegation, however. You’ll be thankful this requirement some day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if you are innocent, being passionate and emotional in defense of yourself is bad?

Exactly. Aren’t liberals the ones always complaining that men don’t show their emotions enough? If he hadn’t shown his very real disgust and devastation, they’d all be claiming he was too calm, cold, and disinterested. There is simply nothing that will ever please this crowd.

I was very impressed with his forcefulness. The time for being polite and deferential (which he certainly was in previous hearings) is OVER. I’m glad he’s speaking up for himself.

“Liberals” aren’t “always” anything. The man’s rage scared me.

His “rage”?? So I guess if you were falsely accused of assault, you’d be perfectly polite and calm? PLEASE. He was absolutely permitted to display his utter disgust with this idiocy. Some of the questions he was asked (Senator Whitehouse, I’m looking at you) were beyond what anyone should have to answer - and yet he did. I think he acquitted himself as well as his raw emotions would allow. Which I thought was very well.
Really hope you never have to defend yourself from false accusations. You might actually feel some justified rage.

+1 well said

He was rude to people being polite to him. He showed NO self control. None.

Gosh, I can’t imagine why he’d be upset. Can you?

You can be mad AND respectful. We teach this to our children.

He WAS both mad AND respectful. He had a simmering rage that was apparent (and justified), but he was also coolly polite. He did a good job for someone who has had false accusations lobbed at him (some patently absurd), who has had to protect his children from this, and who has likely had zero sleep for the past ten days. You guys seriously need to give this man a break.

Did you have the volume down and miss the yelling???? No he was not coolly polite. On no planet was that coolly polite.

We’ll just have to agree to disagree. He was forceful, as I would expect anyone to be in flatly denying a false accusation. I thought he did a good job.

[Anonymous]

Doug Jones says he will vote no on Kavanaugh. Imagine if Roy Moore had won! The Senate chambers would have been full of people accused of assaulting minors.

Red-state Democratic Sen. Doug Jones (Ala.) announced Thursday night that he will oppose Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination.

“Dr. Ford was credible and courageous and I am concerned about the message our vote will be sending to our sons and daughters, as well as victims of sexual assault. I will be voting no," Jones said in a statement.

He added that the process for Kavanaugh's nomination "has been flawed from the beginning and incomplete at the end."

[Anonymous]

Senate Republican moderates remain undecided on how to vote on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh after nearly eight hours of testimony Thursday before the Judiciary Committee, according to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

Manchin, a swing Democrat vote, huddled with three of the undecided Republican votes, Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Jeff Flake (Ariz.), in a Capitol hideaway office before the entire GOP conference met to discuss how to proceed on the controversial nominee.

[Anonymous]

I just have to ask, was Kavanaugh on his period? He seemed really hormonal and illogical. Also, lots of eye rolling.

Someone needs to take this shrew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea if he is guilty or innocent, I'm leaning toward guilty.

That said....ANYONE who is so righteous as to say that he was wrong to get upset is insane.

He probably can't couch is daughter's basketball team again
He probably will be a pariah for the rest of his life...people in extremely blue maryland will think he is a rapist.
He probably is fighting to stay married and to do something to get is daughter on his side.

I just think we forget these people are human.

You have no idea if he’s guilty ? Wtf are you smoking ? What innocent person wouldn’t welcome the FBI investigation ? Or even volunteer to go under a lie detector test ? Also please before hitting submit , do a little spell check . Thanks

On, Im note in high school and I dont car baout my speling
2, Guild and or Innocence is not determined by and FBI investigation
3. ANy idiot knows that lie detector tests are not admissable in cort.

Well I guess he is not just any idiot then.


According to Judge Kavanaugh:

As the Government notes, law enforcement agencies use polygraphs to test the credibility of witnesses and criminal defendants. Those agencies also use polygraphs to “screen applicants for security clearances so that they may be deemed suitable for work in critical law enforcement, defense, and intelligence collection roles.” Declaration of Alesia Y. Williams, Defense Intelligence Agency, Chief of FOIA Services Section, at Joint Appendix 226. In Morley v. CIA, we stated: “Background investigations conducted to assess an applicant’s qualification, such as … clearance and investigatory processes, inherently relate to law enforcement.” 508 F.3d 1108, 1128–29 (D.C.Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Government has satisfactorily explained how polygraph examinations serve law enforcement purposes.

Let me Google that for you
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=are+polygraph+tests+admissible+in+court

He's not in court. But his credibility is at stake. And he said it was good enough to make hiring decisions. But apparently not good enough when he is the job applicant.

[Anonymous]

It's B.S. that the GOP didn't have the sex crimes prosecutor question Kavanaugh, but did have her question Dr. Ford. Separate and unequal treatment of women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just have to ask, was Kavanaugh on his period? He seemed really hormonal and illogical. Also, lots of eye rolling.

Someone needs to take this shrew.

You’re not as clever as you think you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just have to ask, was Kavanaugh on his period? He seemed really hormonal and illogical. Also, lots of eye rolling.

Someone needs to take this shrew.

He needs a devil's triangle with Graham and Grassley.

[Anonymous]

BK vacillates between:

1) High school cool kid
2) College Frat Boy
3) Angry drunk

Can we please do better an find someone that is actually a respectable adult?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just have to ask, was Kavanaugh on his period? He seemed really hormonal and illogical. Also, lots of eye rolling.

Someone needs to take this shrew.

You’re not as clever as you think you are.

Yeah she is. Just imagine Hillary acting like that at her 11 hour Benghazi hearing.