Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of my facts are correct. we differ what those facts mean in determining Dr. Ford's mental state.

1. She [...] her.

Does anyone else get the idea that Mrs. Kavanaugh and her friends are some busy bees on these threads?

Because we bring evidence to contradict assertions people are making here?

Has it occurred to you that some people here want to safeguard the seriousness with which women's assault allegations are taken and feel that is undermined by high profile allegations as flimsy as Ford's?

Agree. I am appalled by these liberals who say we should believe her, regardless of any evidence, because women should be believed....because....well....

I bet these same women would sing a different tune if their husbands were accused.

And I bet YOU would sing a different tune if you or your daughter had been assaulted and no one believed you.

DP. If my daughter had been assaulted, I would counsel her to make a report IMMEDIATELY. Not to, you know, wait 35+ years and then expect to be believed.

Yes, great mother you are, if your daughter was so tramatized and begged you not to force her to make a report you'd force her to. Good going.

And when her accuser says no he didn't do it and no one believes your daughter, glad to know that you'd still be on the side of men who are publicly called out for their assaults.

I'd bet you'd have been one of the high school students who didn't stick up for this girl. I feel sorry for your daughter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/amber-wyatt-told-her-story-of-rape-this-is-how-the-world-responded/2018/09/21/ff11300a-bdda-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?utm_term=.130d8da2989b

Maybe feel sorry for your daughter who has a mother who encourages her weakness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Stop it with the Update America. It gave a better breakdown than the Huff Post did of the Huff Post's own poll. HP's write-up seemed designed to obscure the actual results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Or CNN. Or MSNBC.

Hey, they’re both corporatist entities and both of them hire a lot of questionable folks - including former Trump staffers. But not catching that a caller on a live C-SPAN show used a less precise word isn’t really the same thing as Fox pushing Ed Whelan’s defamation theory of sexual doppelgängers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DP

He could be any of the GOP Senators on the Judiciary Committee, or Trump or Kavanaugh. Because the fact is, any one of them could demand it.

Sounds as if you like language as precise as Blasey’s recollection of her attack by Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Stop it with the Update America. It gave a better breakdown than the Huff Post did of the Huff Post's own poll. HP's write-up seemed designed to obscure the actual results.

I'm the PP who posted the link to the poll, and thanks. The libs here started in with their predictable insults because I dared expose the truth as to how people feel about Ford's credibility. Even HP said the results were "stunning" - and that's because the results were not what they expected. So they wrote around them in an obscure way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

Thanks Boris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Stop it with the Update America. It gave a better breakdown than the Huff Post did of the Huff Post's own poll. HP's write-up seemed designed to obscure the actual results.

Lol. I wouldn’t trust their breakdown.
https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2018/09/19/5ba234fde4b046313fc11590.pdf Page 9. About 26% find it credible, 28% find it not credible, 36% haven’t heard enough and 14% just don’t know. So not quite what Update America said. And certainly not their editorializing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Or CNN. Or MSNBC.

Hey, they’re both corporatist entities and both of them hire a lot of questionable folks - including former Trump staffers. But not catching that a caller on a live C-SPAN show used a less precise word isn’t really the same thing as Fox pushing Ed Whelan’s defamation theory of sexual doppelgängers.

A "less precise" word? Is that how you're spinning it? Oh, I said "rape" when it really wasn't? Details, details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

Thanks Boris.

I have told you many times.... it’s Natasha. Get it right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

Aw, darling take, Serena, but no I think that way about the GOP because I have watched them treat women like dirt for decades. Maybe you need to be led around by the nose by your sources, but I don’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

Thanks Boris.

Oye. They're still with the Russian stuff when they can't refute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Or CNN. Or MSNBC.

Hey, they’re both corporatist entities and both of them hire a lot of questionable folks - including former Trump staffers. But not catching that a caller on a live C-SPAN show used a less precise word isn’t really the same thing as Fox pushing Ed Whelan’s defamation theory of sexual doppelgängers.

A "less precise" word? Is that how you're spinning it? Oh, I said "rape" when it really wasn't? Details, details.

Judge jumped on them allowing Dr. Ford to escape. Seems like Kavanaugh was going to rape her but didn’t get to finish, so yes, “less precise” is accurate. That’s not spin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or they find her credible and just don’t care. They are not bothered by someone who will physically restrain someone for his own amusement sitting on the Supreme Court.

This is the issue that is at the center of this for me. This could have happened last week, been a violent rape, Ford could have video and DNA evidence and it still wouldn’t matter to the GOP because for many of them, women. aren’t. people.

(And I know there will be some goppers who have difficulty with this post, so I will say that very clearly: I am not suggesting that this happened last week, was a violent, or that she has video and DNA evidence. Just that it wouldn’t matter to you if it were the case.

Silly poster.
I am a Republican. I am a woman. Nobody I know who is Republican takes this viewpoint.
You have been led, by the media you watch and read, to believe nonsense because this is their way of firing you up. Looks like their strategy works on you.

Thanks Boris.

Oye. They're still with the Russian stuff when they can't refute.

I refuted it just fine.

(And the GOP has a serious treason problem, but that is quite apart from this mess).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

This. Even she does not claim this. And, it is being spread around that is what she is alleging.

FWIW, someone called into C-Span and said a "rapist" should not be on the Supreme Court. The "experts" responding to the comments never corrected the caller who was claiming that Kavanaugh had raped her.

That's pretty irresponsible of them not to catch that--and says a lot about our media--even Cspan.

This is pathetic. And, people wonder why many of us don’t trust the media..........

No one should trust Fox. Or Update America.

Stop it with the Update America. It gave a better breakdown than the Huff Post did of the Huff Post's own poll. HP's write-up seemed designed to obscure the actual results.

I'm the PP who posted the link to the poll, and thanks. The libs here started in with their predictable insults because I dared expose the truth as to how people feel about Ford's credibility. Even HP said the results were "stunning" - and that's because the results were not what they expected. So they wrote around them in an obscure way.

PP here who said stop it with Update America.

I am actually an independent who voted for Hillary. I had never heard of Update America before. But objectively it did a much more credible job than Huff Post of relaying the poll results. Any fair minded person could tell that, and it is worth calling out when someone tries to smear through innuendo.