Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, what's that? Meghan Markle has won her court case against the Daily Fail completely again for a SECOND TIME!?

FACTS….

[Anonymous]

Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, what's that? Meghan Markle has won her court case against the Daily Fail completely again for a SECOND TIME!?

FACTS….

She lost her credibility and reputation. The truth was revealed in court, even if she won on a technicality. Congrats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that the announcement that Meghan won her appeal (Thursday is going to be release) already filtered its way. Palace is bracing and just begging for leniency.

Really they're getting attacked on all sides. The BBC two part special on William/Harry briefing aired on 22nd and 29th of November. Ghislaine Maxwell's trial started on the 30th of November. Barbados ditched the Queen on the 29th of November permanently. Hasn't even been six months since Phillip's death. Queen hasn't been seen in public for 90+ days. Meghan won all but her most major court case this year as well.

London bridge is falling and I don't just mean one bloody woman.

Kind of nice to wake up with my morning coffee and see I was totally right.

[Anonymous]

Now that she has won AGAIN - I will take bets on exactly how much the Associated News/Daily Fail will be paying the Duchess of Sussex in damages for her momumental case.

Remember - Meghan demanded a full account of the PROFITS they made from her letter over a 2 year period. Now its a 4 year period. And she is acknowledged as the reason the DF was keeping its doors open in the first place from 2017 - 2020.

I will start the bidding at $15 million. This does not include the legal fees they are required to pay on her behalf which total $3 million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

The biggest invasion of their privacy came from them. They told us about their miscarriage, and peeing in the bushes, and the genetic pain brought by their family, and the racism and on and on. They never shut up. They have an opinion on everything and pay a pretty penny to disseminate it. They bring on frivolous lawsuits wasting taxpayer money for personal letters intended to make their narrative public.

No privacy was invaded in the UK, they did not like the press they got. They don’t like the free press or the first amendment.

Who doesn’t want to be in control of what information they share? If you share some of aspects of your life does that mean you want the world outside your house, peering into your window documenting everything you do?

When your job is to be in the news, and when there is a special set of the press corp that has an agreement with your employer, then no, you don't get to be in 100% of your press coverage. This is easy to understand. They didn't like it but it wasn't their place to change it.

So they left and moved to California, where they have even less control of their press coverage. Okay.

They seem to be sharing what they want to share about themselves instead of their information being leaked.

Why, yes they do. Not just sharing but broadcasting their feelings to the world with Oprah and letting everyone in the world know how Megan (I mean the DUCHESS OF SUSSEX) feels about her in-laws while her father-in-law was dying. I don't think most people think highly of that kind of behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

+1

Well played, Daily Mail. This may be the end of you (and good riddance) but you're going to take her down with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the people arguing this back-and-forth like its 2018 again, you realize this is all because the Fail is losing money and doing anything for clicks? Including re-hashing a court case they lost all the way back in January 2021.

They have no chance of winning this appeal or getting anything out of the Sussexs. You can tell just by the fact that they have locked the comments of all the articles pertaining to the court case.

They're calculating the millions they have to hand over to her and just pushing the narrative as a last whine. Which is fine. She'll probably get another $25 million out of this.

Don’t be so gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

Hahaha you keep trying to push pyrrhic. Good for you for beefing up our vocabularies.

I think she has admitted a lot has been lost. They already destroyed her reputation well before she started fighting back. And she keeps winning.

[Anonymous]

Now drag that AMERICAN pasty b**ch Jason Knauf into court and break him. I want to see all of William's texts and emails in the evidence.

"Breach of fiduciary duty occurs when someone has a responsibility to act in the interests of another person and fails to do so."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now drag that AMERICAN pasty b**ch Jason Knauf into court and break him. I want to see all of William's texts and emails in the evidence.

"Breach of fiduciary duty occurs when someone has a responsibility to act in the interests of another person and fails to do so."

Time for a little tell all book from Jason Knauf, with RECEIPTS, because we know he has mountains of them. Now that’s the book that will be sold the world over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

Hahaha you keep trying to push pyrrhic. Good for you for beefing up our vocabularies.

I think she has admitted a lot has been lost. They already destroyed her reputation well before she started fighting back. And she keeps winning.

This was not a win for her. Taking down the DM won't stop the negative press. It's worldwide, if you take a second to look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

Hahaha you keep trying to push pyrrhic. Good for you for beefing up our vocabularies.

I think she has admitted a lot has been lost. They already destroyed her reputation well before she started fighting back. And she keeps winning.

It feels like winning when money is more important to a person than family. In Megan's world, everyone in her family on both sides is wrong, except for her mom, kids and Harry. I don't think that's winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

Hahaha you keep trying to push pyrrhic. Good for you for beefing up our vocabularies.

I think she has admitted a lot has been lost. They already destroyed her reputation well before she started fighting back. And she keeps winning.

It feels like winning when money is more important to a person than family. In Megan's world, everyone in her family on both sides is wrong, except for her mom, kids and Harry. I don't think that's winning.

When someone has family like Thomas and Samantha Markle, and William who throws his brother under the bus via the tabloids, not sure I would want them in my life either. It’s a win for Meghan whether the haters want to acknowledge it or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - it was expected she would win, but at what cost? Her reputation took a huge hit - she admitted to lying in court and it’s clear that she lis a liar. Pyrrhic victory I think is what this is called.

Hahaha you keep trying to push pyrrhic. Good for you for beefing up our vocabularies.

I think she has admitted a lot has been lost. They already destroyed her reputation well before she started fighting back. And she keeps winning.

They wrote about avocados and baby bump holding and chick fights, tabloid fodder. Through her own case she has confirmed she is a liar and manipulative. That’s what trashed her reputation, along with the Oprah interview. She can’t put that genie back in the bottle.