New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Officially announced - LVURush (PA) to GA

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIjUszpsbnW/?img_index=1

For more context, they're very strong at younger ages and in the ECRL NE (with other RL only clubs). I guess no full ECNL promotion so they went to GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Officially announced - LVURush (PA) to GA

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIjUszpsbnW/?img_index=1

For more context, they're very strong at younger ages and in the ECRL NE (with other RL only clubs). I guess no full ECNL promotion so they went to GA.

When there's multiple 2nd tier clubs in a specific area there's a very good chance that either GA or ECNL will pull them all up. This will create a local league with less driving for parents. We'll see what happens next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Officially announced - LVURush (PA) to GA

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIjUszpsbnW/?img_index=1

That’s a BOOM!

sure pal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Officially announced - LVURush (PA) to GA

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIjUszpsbnW/?img_index=1

Solid add. Dings northeast rl as they were a top team through many age groups

[Anonymous]

I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

In some areas tryouts are in April/May so teams for next year have not formed yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For what it’s worth, everything that Nationals has accomplished has been accomplished in the GA/DA. Literally every kid on their top teams were getting offers when they were playing GA. The ECNL really did nothing for them. They were already there, thanks to the GA/DA.

Why did they leave GA?

So they don’t have to develop players anymore. GA forces their clubs to develop and more importantly, do not allow them to poach or recruit.

What is your beef with a club from Michigan 😂. Nationals has always developed kids, it’s the same coaches and director as before, I really don’t think they will change.

Top clubs who do it year in and year out, sorry but there’s a bit more to it than they do no developing and just recruit.

Weird, ignorant narrative. Top clubs in ECNL, GA, etc year after year are there because they have earned it and do more. Simple

The real top programs are league proof. Since you’re using Nationals as an example they survived years surrounded by ECNL clubs, obviously had to be doing something different/good.


GA hats still bitter they left, and trying to downplay their value to make it seem like they are an easy replacement with what ga is adding

Anyone with half a brain knows better, but we love keyboard cowboys!
Tophat has survivors years surrounded by ECNL clubs, must have been doing something different/good.

Just because it doesnt happen here in our area, doesn’t mean it doesnt happen elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For what it’s worth, everything that Nationals has accomplished has been accomplished in the GA/DA. Literally every kid on their top teams were getting offers when they were playing GA. The ECNL really did nothing for them. They were already there, thanks to the GA/DA.

Why did they leave GA?

So they don’t have to develop players anymore. GA forces their clubs to develop and more importantly, do not allow them to poach or recruit.

What is your beef with a club from Michigan 😂. Nationals has always developed kids, it’s the same coaches and director as before, I really don’t think they will change.

Top clubs who do it year in and year out, sorry but there’s a bit more to it than they do no developing and just recruit.

Weird, ignorant narrative. Top clubs in ECNL, GA, etc year after year are there because they have earned it and do more. Simple

The real top programs are league proof. Since you’re using Nationals as an example they survived years surrounded by ECNL clubs, obviously had to be doing something different/good.

Tophat has survivors years surrounded by ECNL clubs, must have been doing something different/good.

Just because it doesnt happen here in our area, doesn’t mean it doesnt happen elsewhere.

GA hats still bitter they left, and trying to downplay their value to make it seem like they are an easy replacement with what ga is adding

Anyone with half a brain knows better, but we love keyboard cowboys!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

No actually. Those got added to RL, their second tier league. Just like Aspire, each league has one.

Keep trying to twist points though.

GA volume wise is bigger than ECNL, but still only accounts for 20% of D1 commits, math says it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

No actually. Those got added to RL, their second tier league. Just like Aspire, each league has one.

Keep trying to twist points though.

GA volume wise is bigger than ECNL, but still only accounts for 20% of D1 commits, math says it all.

I’m convinced there are people in other countries that are paid to troll and scare parents of joining GA.

I wonder why you all are so worried trying to diminish a league…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

No actually. Those got added to RL, their second tier league. Just like Aspire, each league has one.

Keep trying to twist points though.

GA volume wise is bigger than ECNL, but still only accounts for 20% of D1 commits, math says it all.

and most of those recruits come from 30 of the clubs and the rest get 1 or 2 players to D1, just like a lot of clubs in the country...and keep counting the GA teams that switched to ENCL as ECNL recruits, but then don't have GA count the ECNL clubs that just switched to GA...just keeping repeating all the ECNL twitter talking points

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

No actually. Those got added to RL, their second tier league. Just like Aspire, each league has one.

Keep trying to twist points though.

GA volume wise is bigger than ECNL, but still only accounts for 20% of D1 commits, math says it all.

I’m convinced there are people in other countries that are paid to troll and scare parents of joining GA.

I wonder why you all are so worried trying to diminish a league…

I think its more like GA parents trying to put on their big boy pants but now realizing the pants can't stay up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just curious, how are clubs getting added this late?

they were approved long time ago just not publicly announced. GA tried to delay announcements doing maybe 1 a week thinking it was some sort of big deal and everyone would be waiting with breathless excitement as they added low level teams

Like when ECNL added 190 teams in RL?

No actually. Those got added to RL, their second tier league. Just like Aspire, each league has one.

Keep trying to twist points though.

GA volume wise is bigger than ECNL, but still only accounts for 20% of D1 commits, math says it all.

I’m convinced there are people in other countries that are paid to troll and scare parents of joining GA.

I wonder why you all are so worried trying to diminish a league…

I think its more like GA parents trying to put on their big boy pants but now realizing the pants can't stay up

What's really funny reading through here is many ECNL parents were or going to be GA parents (and visa-versa) ... and they all probably started out with USYS t-shirts.