New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:STA news incoming

Wouldn't be a shock, they keep getting denied access to MLSN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No announcements.

Clubs got the cold feets

Clubs were never moving. Someone created a fake message and the IHS guy took the bait.

It wasn't IHS guy.

IHS commented on the post. but IHS and IMYS are the same person.

What did he comment?

He gave it a platform, essentially co-signing. He needs to decide if he wants to be a credible source of information.

Not really. He added to the conversation on that platform. Nothing more. Didn't say one way or the other. Kinda like what we're all doing anonymously here!

[Anonymous]

It's the same as all the pro ECNL social sites and many ECNL clubs promoting the BS data about RL being better than GA and giving the stat about coaches being more at RL than GA (which is not even close). then in fine print they add % increase. Well if 10 coaches were at RL and it moved to 20 the increase will be much higher as a %.

GA had a decrease (so did ECNL), but GA has much more coaches at their events than RL does (as ECNL has more coaches than GA).

You can make any stat look a certain way if you want. again, it's ecnl pushing the FOMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No announcements.

Clubs got the cold feets

Clubs were never moving. Someone created a fake message and the IHS guy took the bait.

It wasn't IHS guy.

IHS commented on the post. but IHS and IMYS are the same person.

What did he comment?

He gave it a platform, essentially co-signing. He needs to decide if he wants to be a credible source of information.

Not really. He added to the conversation on that platform. Nothing more. Didn't say one way or the other. Kinda like what we're all doing anonymously here!

If you’re an ECNL coach/content creator, there’s a higher bar. Message board posters can speculate, that’s the nature of anonymous forums. But when you have a platform and a podcast putting out unsubstantiated rumors isn’t harmless conversation, it shapes perception and can impact players, families, and clubs.

If you want to be taken seriously as a voice in the space, there has to be a clear line between informed insight and speculation. Otherwise it undercuts credibility pretty quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No announcements.

Clubs got the cold feets

Clubs were never moving. Someone created a fake message and the IHS guy took the bait.

It wasn't IHS guy.

IHS commented on the post. but IHS and IMYS are the same person.

What did he comment?

He gave it a platform, essentially co-signing. He needs to decide if he wants to be a credible source of information.

Not really. He added to the conversation on that platform. Nothing more. Didn't say one way or the other. Kinda like what we're all doing anonymously here!

If you’re an ECNL coach/content creator, there’s a higher bar. Message board posters can speculate, that’s the nature of anonymous forums. But when you have a platform and a podcast putting out unsubstantiated rumors isn’t harmless conversation, it shapes perception and can impact players, families, and clubs.

If you want to be taken seriously as a voice in the space, there has to be a clear line between informed insight and speculation. Otherwise it undercuts credibility pretty quickly.

What drugs are you on? Because I want some.

All he does is as questions based off what he’s hearing from people to try and get answers and he talks to both sides and talks up both sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No announcements.

Clubs got the cold feets

Clubs were never moving. Someone created a fake message and the IHS guy took the bait.

It wasn't IHS guy.

IHS commented on the post. but IHS and IMYS are the same person.

What did he comment?

He gave it a platform, essentially co-signing. He needs to decide if he wants to be a credible source of information.

Not really. He added to the conversation on that platform. Nothing more. Didn't say one way or the other. Kinda like what we're all doing anonymously here!

If you’re an ECNL coach/content creator, there’s a higher bar. Message board posters can speculate, that’s the nature of anonymous forums. But when you have a platform and a podcast putting out unsubstantiated rumors isn’t harmless conversation, it shapes perception and can impact players, families, and clubs.

If you want to be taken seriously as a voice in the space, there has to be a clear line between informed insight and speculation. Otherwise it undercuts credibility pretty quickly.

What drugs are you on? Because I want some.

All he does is as questions based off what he’s hearing from people to try and get answers and he talks to both sides and talks up both sides.

I like his stuff. Ever since he moved back to Detroit area, if you are truly paying attention he is shaping his message way more to ECNL. He is clever with it, but it's there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the same as all the pro ECNL social sites and many ECNL clubs promoting the BS data about RL being better than GA and giving the stat about coaches being more at RL than GA (which is not even close). then in fine print they add % increase. Well if 10 coaches were at RL and it moved to 20 the increase will be much higher as a %.

GA had a decrease (so did ECNL), but GA has much more coaches at their events than RL does (as ECNL has more coaches than GA).

You can make any stat look a certain way if you want. again, it's ecnl pushing the FOMO.

This. If they put out the same stat against ECNL, it would make it look like RL was better! Even funniest when the clubs posting these graphics have very few commits themselves. Who cares what the league is doing? What is that club doing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No announcements.

Clubs got the cold feets

Clubs were never moving. Someone created a fake message and the IHS guy took the bait.

It wasn't IHS guy.

IHS commented on the post. but IHS and IMYS are the same person.

What did he comment?

He gave it a platform, essentially co-signing. He needs to decide if he wants to be a credible source of information.

Not really. He added to the conversation on that platform. Nothing more. Didn't say one way or the other. Kinda like what we're all doing anonymously here!

If you’re an ECNL coach/content creator, there’s a higher bar. Message board posters can speculate, that’s the nature of anonymous forums. But when you have a platform and a podcast putting out unsubstantiated rumors isn’t harmless conversation, it shapes perception and can impact players, families, and clubs.

If you want to be taken seriously as a voice in the space, there has to be a clear line between informed insight and speculation. Otherwise it undercuts credibility pretty quickly.

What drugs are you on? Because I want some.

All he does is as questions based off what he’s hearing from people to try and get answers and he talks to both sides and talks up both sides.

I like his stuff. Ever since he moved back to Detroit area, if you are truly paying attention he is shaping his message way more to ECNL. He is clever with it, but it's there.

Two girls in GA and I’ve never heard him say anything that was a shot at GA or made me think he is an ECNL homer. To me he’s the only one asking a lot of the questions I find myself thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the same as all the pro ECNL social sites and many ECNL clubs promoting the BS data about RL being better than GA and giving the stat about coaches being more at RL than GA (which is not even close). then in fine print they add % increase. Well if 10 coaches were at RL and it moved to 20 the increase will be much higher as a %.

GA had a decrease (so did ECNL), but GA has much more coaches at their events than RL does (as ECNL has more coaches than GA).

You can make any stat look a certain way if you want. again, it's ecnl pushing the FOMO.

Where are the stats about ECNL attendance decrease? All I’ve seen are increased numbers (both for ECNL & RL).

If you could provide some links please I’d like to see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's the same as all the pro ECNL social sites and many ECNL clubs promoting the BS data about RL being better than GA and giving the stat about coaches being more at RL than GA (which is not even close). then in fine print they add % increase. Well if 10 coaches were at RL and it moved to 20 the increase will be much higher as a %.

GA had a decrease (so did ECNL), but GA has much more coaches at their events than RL does (as ECNL has more coaches than GA).

You can make any stat look a certain way if you want. again, it's ecnl pushing the FOMO.

Where are the stats about ECNL attendance decrease? All I’ve seen are increased numbers (both for ECNL & RL).

If you could provide some links please I’d like to see.

Sorry, GA doesn’t have a guy like IHS cooking up AI graphics with cherry picked data.

[Anonymous]

Legends is opening a WA expansion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Legends is opening a WA expansion

Going to take some time to build that up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1H1KU1d4z2/

What does this signal

Hard to know, maybe they are fielding a USL women’s team?

Probably moving into GA

Aren't they already GA?

They announced they added a new girls Coach. Coach Sean Arzu. That could be it?