Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

This is very odd.

[Anonymous]

So since judge made them go back to enter amount - does that mean they found for JD?

[Anonymous]

what?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So since judge made them go back to enter amount - does that mean they found for JD?

Sounds like it

Someone one

[Anonymous]

Here comes his $1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So since judge made them go back to enter amount - does that mean they found for JD?

and if so, I wonder if him being a no show would affect the amount they enter. lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So since judge made them go back to enter amount - does that mean they found for JD?

No, they both asserted defamation claims, so either could get a judgment in their favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And Depp is yucking it up in London. With one of the trial witnesses no less.

So much disrespect for the court system and the jurors. And generally everyone.

You suckers.

Why? He’s suing her! You all just want drama. Neither one “needs” to be there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So since judge made them go back to enter amount - does that mean they found for JD?

No, they both asserted defamation claims, so either could get a judgment in their favor.

Oh, that's right... I was not thinking that through!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#teamhopethejuryevaluatedthelegalbasisofthecomplaint

Odds are they will. Juries make mistakes sometimes, but overall juries tend to take their responsibilities seriously and really do their best to get the correct answer from a legal standpoint. Those verdicts are sometimes dissatisfying to the public, but more often than not it’s because the public did not properly understand the law and the process rather than because the jury got it wrong based on the evidence.

PP here. All that said, the jury not filling out the damages amount does not inspire confidence.

[Anonymous]

No matter the verdict, it has been a wild ride!

[Anonymous]

It seems like they found for JD since he was the one that didn't care about the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They should have required Depp to be at the court house. He disrupted the juror’s life for weeks and now can’t be bothered to show up.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#teamhopethejuryevaluatedthelegalbasisofthecomplaint

Odds are they will. Juries make mistakes sometimes, but overall juries tend to take their responsibilities seriously and really do their best to get the correct answer from a legal standpoint. Those verdicts are sometimes dissatisfying to the public, but more often than not it’s because the public did not properly understand the law and the process rather than because the jury got it wrong based on the evidence.

PP here. All that said, the jury not filling out the damages amount does not inspire confidence.

Yes I found that discouraging

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems like they found for JD since he was the one that didn't care about the money.

LOL, that’s one way to read tea leaves.