Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The outcome of all this is now Trump is limiting who is on foreign calls. This is very troublesome.

I can't blame him. Also, it helps to limit leaks.
If fewer people are on the call, leakers are easier to identify.
He should have done this sooner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The outcome of all this is now Trump is limiting who is on foreign calls. This is very troublesome.

I can't blame him. Also, it helps to limit leaks.
If fewer people are on the call, leakers are easier to identify.
He should have done this sooner.

So you prefer a Junta?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The outcome of all this is now Trump is limiting who is on foreign calls. This is very troublesome.

I can't blame him. Also, it helps to limit leaks.
If fewer people are on the call, leakers are easier to identify.
He should have done this sooner.

Holy cow, you are scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On one hand, Democrats called President Trump “a continuing threat to our democracy and national security.” On the other, they said he is a trustworthy partner in consummating the grandest trade deal the United States has ever negotiated.

Only political

Huh?

USCMA. Largest trade deal in the history of the US that the House just signed off on. #Winning.

Good I’m glad NAFTA 2.0 finally got resolved.

Yes. They didn’t negotiate a new trade agreement. They negotiated a few tweaks and a new name for NAFTA.

+1 and Mitch has already said the Senate isn’t going to vote on it.

So that takes away the 'do-nothing democrats" Trump has been complaining about. As I posted earlier, Pelosi played this well.

You think Americans re dumb enough not to see that the only reason Pelosi got this done after dragging her heels for a year was to counter the do nothing Democrat storyline? The timing couldn’t be more obvious and ham handed. All politicians are clowns.

That, and also helping Russian in dividing this country. Russian's goal was never about the Trump or Hillary. To make US unstable either economically or politically was the ultimate goal. Russians are cheering watching how the US and Ukrainian relations unveil in this investigation. So, whatever Democrats do is helps Russian tremendously.

Thanks entirely to the Republicans immoral and unconstitutional behavior.

[Anonymous]

Can Donald Trump impeach the House for obstruction of the executive branch? I know we need a wall. You know we need a wall. We all know we need a wall. Donald Trump was elected POTUS on the basis of his intention to build a wall. Only now the House has refused to 'fund' the wall, thereby obstructing the duly elected POTUS. Anyway, isn't 'funding' such a quaint, old concept and now obsolete what with the House already running a yearly $1T deficit? Do we still need a House of Representatives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can Donald Trump impeach the House for obstruction of the executive branch? I know we need a wall. You know we need a wall. We all know we need a wall. Donald Trump was elected POTUS on the basis of his intention to build a wall. Only now the House has refused to 'fund' the wall, thereby obstructing the duly elected POTUS. Anyway, isn't 'funding' such a quaint, old concept and now obsolete what with the House already running a yearly $1T deficit? Do we still need a House of Representatives?

I’m a retired DHS/ICE Special Agent who was assigned to SWB issues. The wall is all smoke and mirrors. The minute you put it up, it will be compromised. The cartels access to money and R&D outpaces the USG. Build if you want, but it’s only going to slow them down for about 2-4 weeks.

[Anonymous]

Fund the wall and a bounty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can Donald Trump impeach the House for obstruction of the executive branch? I know we need a wall. You know we need a wall. We all know we need a wall. Donald Trump was elected POTUS on the basis of his intention to build a wall. Only now the House has refused to 'fund' the wall, thereby obstructing the duly elected POTUS. Anyway, isn't 'funding' such a quaint, old concept and now obsolete what with the House already running a yearly $1T deficit? Do we still need a House of Representatives?

The House was elected on the basis that we don't want a wall. And they didn't need the electoral college to win.

[Anonymous]

Looks like the Democrats have a defector in the House. He may change his party affliation.

Democrats don't realize what they have wrought with this dumb move to impeach Trump with the total assurance that he will be acquitted.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/474587-anti-impeachment-democrat-poised-to-switch-parties-reports

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Democrats have a defector in the House. He may change his party affliation.

Democrats don't realize what they have wrought with this dumb move to impeach Trump with the total assurance that he will be acquitted.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/474587-anti-impeachment-democrat-poised-to-switch-parties-reports

Big deal. One guy, who has been saying this for a while.

[Anonymous]

" The House has refused to 'fund' the wall, thereby obstructing the duly elected POTUS. Anyway, isn't 'funding' such a quaint, old concept and now obsolete what with the House already running a yearly $1T deficit? Do we still need a House of Representatives? "

In favor of eliminating the House:

1) Puts a proper end to Congressional gerrymandering.

2) Our purse has a huge hole in it so we no longer need anybody to hold our purse strings.

3) Congressional staffs are so bloated that each exceeds the number of field-level passes handed out by the Dallas Cowboys.

4) Said staffs and former lobbyists to same could do something productive for a change.

And that is only what immediately suggests itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Democrats have a defector in the House. He may change his party affliation.

Democrats don't realize what they have wrought with this dumb move to impeach Trump with the total assurance that he will be acquitted.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/474587-anti-impeachment-democrat-poised-to-switch-parties-reports

100% NRA A rating and otherwise a GOP in Dem clothing. He will lose his next election.

[Anonymous]

All Roads Lead to Putin

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1205910070015381505.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The outcome of all this is now Trump is limiting who is on foreign calls. This is very troublesome.

I can't blame him. Also, it helps to limit leaks.
If fewer people are on the call, leakers are easier to identify.
He should have done this sooner.

It's sad, the extent you people will go to make excuses for that man.

[Anonymous]

The NSC is also being down-sized.