Russia purges its creative and intellectual class every 30 years or so. That’s why it implodes every 50 years, it keeps the low intellect sycophants who can keep it going for a couple more decades before running the country to the ditch and the cycle begins anew. |
More desperate threats from russia
Russia's space program threatens to leave astronaut aboard ISS https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10608023/Video-posted-Russias-space-program-threatens-leave-astronaut-55-aboard-space-station.html |
The sanctions will have a brutal impact on the middle class and the poor. With the ruble crashing and the country defaulting, any little saving they may have had is gone, the price of everything will increase drastically. There are already limits on how much food can be purchased at supermarkets, soon shelves will become barer.
The sad thing is that even if the sanctions were to be lifted tomorrow, the damage is already done. No investor will lend to Russia and no foreign business will step foot in it. |
I understood your perfectly valid reply. You were responding to the ridiculous assertion by a troll that Americans have it worse than Russians. Their Ruble is now worth less than ten cents and their ATM and Mastercards no longer work. The troll then hysterically twisted your words. This is what they do. |
If China gets involved, it will be WW3. The US will simply say, those trillions we supposedly owe you? Forgetaboutit. |
When did China ever get involved in such things? China did not even sanction Russia. China is the Empire that lives on, by not getting involved in something it does not serve it. The U.S. on the other hand will get involved and then yes, WW3. |
Nor can they make online purchases except with whatever flaky Chinese Sberbank card Russia is desperately trying to roll out. |
China’s weakness is international policy in crisis situations. Response is very slow. Multiple groups of people need to make up their minds. Multiple people’s influences need to be considered. Consensus is hard to reach in such a huge country with such complex domestic affairs. It’s a very powerful country, that already owns large portions of Africa, but it has very little experience as a political broker on the world stage. China will NOT engage in war or war by proxy. It does not want to *support* Russia. China has no friends and no loyalty. It may end up *owning* Russia if sanctions push Russia into desperate measures to prevent financial implosion. China does not want to confront the West. It depends on the West to enrich itself so it wants Western economies thrumming and buying its products. There is also the delicate issue of Taiwan. It is trying to position Taiwan as different than Ukraine. Sadly WWIII can happen if Putin provokes NATO badly enough. This is China’s worst nightmare. |
She is truly an embarrassment.
What she said: What was transcribed in the official WH transcript: "So I will say what I know we all say, and I will say over and over again: The United States stands firmly with the Ukrainian people [and] in defense of the NATO Alliance. (Applause.)" https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/03/12/remarks-by-vice-president-harris-at-the-dnc-winter-meeting/ |
Didn't China supply weapons to the North Koreans and/or the North Vietnamese? |
While technically correct, I'm not quite sure why you're using this particular thread of conversation to make that point. It's completely normal for politicians to overstate their sense belonging to certain groups or causes if they think it will draw in international support. In this case, the Ukrainian political establishment is motivated to disassociate themselves with the perception of Nazism, wants to associate itself with oppressed group, and would probably love to have Israel more strongly supportive of its cause. Yes, PP notes that the Zelensky's story is completely reconcilable, but PP's PP was also completely correct in noting that there's an objective reason to question whether he's "very" Jewish or that the Russian army would be targeting him on religious grounds. Also, please spare the melodrama. Just because we're supposed to side with a leader doesn't mean that there's a societal expectation to consider them a sincere or likeable leader. |
Lol. It’s Kamala. What do you expect? |
Maybe, but that is the same involvement the U.S. is doing in China, it is not a proclamation of war or some significant action. |
^^ I meant in Ukraine. |