Why is DJT so obsessed with pushing hydroxychloroquine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turns out, it makes things worse

https://apnews.com/a5077c7227b8eb8b0dc23423c0bbe2b2

Let's actually read this piece.
Oh, look here...

"The nationwide study was not a rigorous experiment."

And, I read on and find......

"The study was posted on an online site for researchers and has not been reviewed by other scientists. Grants from the National Institutes of Health and the University of Virginia paid for the work."

So, this was another anecdotal report. Not a double blind study.

You cannot promote this "study" as fact and ignore the anecdotal reports of doctors and patients who have success with the combination of these two drugs.
They are all anecdotal.

in conclusion, Trump and his proxies were lying when they claimed it “works” and people who say otherwise just “hate Trump so much they want people to die.”

No.
There are many anecdotal reports of people, and doctors, who have said that they made marked improvement after taking this combination of drugs.
There are also anecdotal reports of people who had serious, and sometimes fatal side effects after taking these drugs.

Both can be true. And, so far, all the reports are anecdotal.

Why is this hard for you to comprehend?

the anecdotal nature is not hard at all for me to understand. The question is why Trump and Fox were pushing it, to the extent people were claiming here that . Beyond that, there were other reasons to think the French doctor was questionable, and the “French studies” were worthless.

If "pushing it," you mean having people speak who claim that HQX was the remedy that caused their recovery - that is actually news.
Just like others are touting the success of Remdesivir.
And, who claimed that "clinical trials were a Democratic ploy to undermine Trump?"

dude we ALL saw this happening in real time here. There is no backing away from what happened. On the one side, we had people saying “we don’t know until clinical trials.” On the other hand, you had “Fire Fauci!” and Laura Ingragam claiming Democrats want to kill people, and Trump setting off a hoarding panic that meant lupus patients couldn’t get their meds.

you can’t back pedal now, no matter how hard you try.

The BARDA Director has filed a whistleblower complaint about this
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/22/rick-bright-barda-director-claims-political-retali/

Sounds like there is much more to this story.

Politico....

Anyone who disagrees with Trump is guilt of “incompetence and insubordination” in his mind. This just backs it up. He probably told Trump the truth back in January about something else, and Trump has wanted him gone ever since.

also ... if you read the ENTIRE twitter thread (instead of the one tweet you selectively posted) you see that the reporter makes extremely clear that numerous sources have reported being pressured by the Trump Admin on hydroxychloroquine, and that the sources now making claims about Bright are all inside the Trump Admin. https://threader.app/thread/1253061054659248129

If you read the article, you will find this....

Bright told The New York Times on Wednesday that he believed his removal was because of his internal opposition to pursuing investments in malaria drugs as potential treatments for Covid-19, which President Donald Trump has touted without scientific evidence. Three people with knowledge of HHS' recent acquisition of tens of millions of doses of those drugs said that Bright had supported those acquisitions in internal communications, with one official saying that Bright praised the move as a win for the health department as part of an email exchange that was first reported by Reuters last week, although Bright's message was not publicly reported.

"If Bright opposed hydroxychloroquine, he certainly didn't make that clear from his email — quite the opposite," said the official, who has seen copies of the email exchanges.

In a statement late Wednesday, an HHS official directly linked Bright's decisions to the health department's acquisition of the malaria drugs.

"As it relates to chloroquine, it was Dr. Bright who requested an Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration for donations of chloroquine that Bayer and Sandoz recently made to the Strategic National Stockpile for use on COVID-19 patients," spokesperson Caitlin Oakley said. "The EUA is what made the donated product available for use in combating COVID-19."

The selection of hydroxychloroquine as a possible candidate was not made solely because of the French trial results. The nature of the COVID-19 viral illness destroyed blood cells and produced coagulapathies, inflammation, and cytokine storm very similar to lupus. As a medical person who has been dealing with drug shortages for the past ten years - most recently this year with the shortage of IgG ( look up the conditions who suffered as a result - devastating people with ALS, neurological degenerative diseases, etc) AMONG MANY OTHER SHORTAGES, it was reasonable to obtain supply before full results were out. On the other hand, I can see the outrage if this drug were not obtainable - “TRUMP DIDN’T ACT SOON ENOUGH TO OBTAin LIFE SAVING DRUG....BLOOD ON HIS HANDS.” And all the accompanying hysteria. You can slam him both ways, but you look stupid doing it.

At this time, there are no specific therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with COVID-19, hospitals doctors and scientist have understood this, in spite of the lay people trying to make Trump’s statements more than they are. If you would like an excellent review of current treatment studies, I encourage you to follow this link to see what hospitals, doctors and researchers are actually doing, rather than using hype to guide your emotions.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.

You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

[Anonymous]

^^^ to the person who left the one line reply and your qualifications are what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The selection of hydroxychloroquine as a possible candidate was not made solely because of the French trial results. The nature of the COVID-19 viral illness destroyed blood cells and produced coagulapathies, inflammation, and cytokine storm very similar to lupus. As a medical person who has been dealing with drug shortages for the past ten years - most recently this year with the shortage of IgG ( look up the conditions who suffered as a result - devastating people with ALS, neurological degenerative diseases, etc) AMONG MANY OTHER SHORTAGES, it was reasonable to obtain supply before full results were out. On the other hand, I can see the outrage if this drug were not obtainable - “TRUMP DIDN’T ACT SOON ENOUGH TO OBTAin LIFE SAVING DRUG....BLOOD ON HIS HANDS.” And all the accompanying hysteria. You can slam him both ways, but you look stupid doing it.

At this time, there are no specific therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with COVID-19, hospitals doctors and scientist have understood this, in spite of the lay people trying to make Trump’s statements more than they are. If you would like an excellent review of current treatment studies, I encourage you to follow this link to see what hospitals, doctors and researchers are actually doing, rather than using hype to guide your emotions.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/

Awwww it's so, so hard to be the most powerful person on earth. Won't someone think of lil' Donald's feelings?

Maybe he should stop hyping drugs until the scientists and doctors make a break-thru? He comes across as an untrustworthy, ill-informed moron AT BEST.

When did Presidents become such whiny p#ssies? Legit question.

+100. PP doesn’t sound like a medical professional. Not having good therapies is no excuse for pushing an unproven therapy. Also, Trump’s statements were really clear, nobody is “trying to make them more than they are.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^ to the person who left the one line reply and your qualifications are what?

Moral human being.

[Anonymous]

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

For the umpteenth time, what is a "medical person"?

Yes, when the President called an unproven treatment "a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine" that did confuse me. Grownups don't talk that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

You: "Only idiots would actually believe what the President says."

He has terrible judgment and is unfit to be President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

You: "Only idiots would actually believe what the President says."

He has terrible judgment and is unfit to be President.

No a Fauci said it best, which was: data needed to be reviewed. He said it on national TV, standing next to Trump. Physicians were not listening to trump, they were paying attention to Fauci. I expect physicians to critically evaluate data and use evidence based practices. that has been the prevailing guidance of treatments and the standard of care for years now. Many years. I’m pointing out that lay people think they have a “gotcha moment”. When they really don’t. You’re trying too hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

You: "Only idiots would actually believe what the President says."

He has terrible judgment and is unfit to be President.

No a Fauci said it best, which was: data needed to be reviewed. He said it on national TV, standing next to Trump. Physicians were not listening to trump, they were paying attention to Fauci. I expect physicians to critically evaluate data and use evidence based practices. that has been the prevailing guidance of treatments and the standard of care for years now. Many years. I’m pointing out that lay people think they have a “gotcha moment”. When they really don’t. You’re trying too hard.

You, again: "Only idiots actually listen to our President."

It is morally wrong for him to speculate that this drug may be "biggest game changers in the history of medicine." You may be an expert "medical person" but it is plain for even Kindergartners to see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turns out, it makes things worse

https://apnews.com/a5077c7227b8eb8b0dc23423c0bbe2b2

Let's actually read this piece.
Oh, look here...

"The nationwide study was not a rigorous experiment."

And, I read on and find......

"The study was posted on an online site for researchers and has not been reviewed by other scientists. Grants from the National Institutes of Health and the University of Virginia paid for the work."

So, this was another anecdotal report. Not a double blind study.

You cannot promote this "study" as fact and ignore the anecdotal reports of doctors and patients who have success with the combination of these two drugs.
They are all anecdotal.

in conclusion, Trump and his proxies were lying when they claimed it “works” and people who say otherwise just “hate Trump so much they want people to die.”

No.
There are many anecdotal reports of people, and doctors, who have said that they made marked improvement after taking this combination of drugs.
There are also anecdotal reports of people who had serious, and sometimes fatal side effects after taking these drugs.

Both can be true. And, so far, all the reports are anecdotal.

Why is this hard for you to comprehend?

the anecdotal nature is not hard at all for me to understand. The question is why Trump and Fox were pushing it, to the extent people were claiming here that . Beyond that, there were other reasons to think the French doctor was questionable, and the “French studies” were worthless.

If "pushing it," you mean having people speak who claim that HQX was the remedy that caused their recovery - that is actually news.
Just like others are touting the success of Remdesivir.
And, who claimed that "clinical trials were a Democratic ploy to undermine Trump?"

dude we ALL saw this happening in real time here. There is no backing away from what happened. On the one side, we had people saying “we don’t know until clinical trials.” On the other hand, you had “Fire Fauci!” and Laura Ingragam claiming Democrats want to kill people, and Trump setting off a hoarding panic that meant lupus patients couldn’t get their meds.

you can’t back pedal now, no matter how hard you try.

The BARDA Director has filed a whistleblower complaint about this
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/22/rick-bright-barda-director-claims-political-retali/

Sounds like there is much more to this story.

Politico....

Anyone who disagrees with Trump is guilt of “incompetence and insubordination” in his mind. This just backs it up. He probably told Trump the truth back in January about something else, and Trump has wanted him gone ever since.

also ... if you read the ENTIRE twitter thread (instead of the one tweet you selectively posted) you see that the reporter makes extremely clear that numerous sources have reported being pressured by the Trump Admin on hydroxychloroquine, and that the sources now making claims about Bright are all inside the Trump Admin. https://threader.app/thread/1253061054659248129

If you read the article, you will find this....

Bright told The New York Times on Wednesday that he believed his removal was because of his internal opposition to pursuing investments in malaria drugs as potential treatments for Covid-19, which President Donald Trump has touted without scientific evidence. Three people with knowledge of HHS' recent acquisition of tens of millions of doses of those drugs said that Bright had supported those acquisitions in internal communications, with one official saying that Bright praised the move as a win for the health department as part of an email exchange that was first reported by Reuters last week, although Bright's message was not publicly reported.

"If Bright opposed hydroxychloroquine, he certainly didn't make that clear from his email — quite the opposite," said the official, who has seen copies of the email exchanges.

In a statement late Wednesday, an HHS official directly linked Bright's decisions to the health department's acquisition of the malaria drugs.

"As it relates to chloroquine, it was Dr. Bright who requested an Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration for donations of chloroquine that Bayer and Sandoz recently made to the Strategic National Stockpile for use on COVID-19 patients," spokesperson Caitlin Oakley said. "The EUA is what made the donated product available for use in combating COVID-19."

The selection of hydroxychloroquine as a possible candidate was not made solely because of the French trial results. The nature of the COVID-19 viral illness destroyed blood cells and produced coagulapathies, inflammation, and cytokine storm very similar to lupus. As a medical person who has been dealing with drug shortages for the past ten years - most recently this year with the shortage of IgG ( look up the conditions who suffered as a result - devastating people with ALS, neurological degenerative diseases, etc) AMONG MANY OTHER SHORTAGES, it was reasonable to obtain supply before full results were out. On the other hand, I can see the outrage if this drug were not obtainable - “TRUMP DIDN’T ACT SOON ENOUGH TO OBTAin LIFE SAVING DRUG....BLOOD ON HIS HANDS.” And all the accompanying hysteria. You can slam him both ways, but you look stupid doing it.

At this time, there are no specific therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with COVID-19, hospitals doctors and scientist have understood this, in spite of the lay people trying to make Trump’s statements more than they are. If you would like an excellent review of current treatment studies, I encourage you to follow this link to see what hospitals, doctors and researchers are actually doing, rather than using hype to guide your emotions.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/

What is a medical person?

10 bucks says this shmuck works in pharma or medical device sales. It would explain the affinity for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turns out, it makes things worse

https://apnews.com/a5077c7227b8eb8b0dc23423c0bbe2b2

Let's actually read this piece.
Oh, look here...

"The nationwide study was not a rigorous experiment."

And, I read on and find......

"The study was posted on an online site for researchers and has not been reviewed by other scientists. Grants from the National Institutes of Health and the University of Virginia paid for the work."

So, this was another anecdotal report. Not a double blind study.

You cannot promote this "study" as fact and ignore the anecdotal reports of doctors and patients who have success with the combination of these two drugs.
They are all anecdotal.

in conclusion, Trump and his proxies were lying when they claimed it “works” and people who say otherwise just “hate Trump so much they want people to die.”

No.
There are many anecdotal reports of people, and doctors, who have said that they made marked improvement after taking this combination of drugs.
There are also anecdotal reports of people who had serious, and sometimes fatal side effects after taking these drugs.

Both can be true. And, so far, all the reports are anecdotal.

Why is this hard for you to comprehend?

the anecdotal nature is not hard at all for me to understand. The question is why Trump and Fox were pushing it, to the extent people were claiming here that . Beyond that, there were other reasons to think the French doctor was questionable, and the “French studies” were worthless.

If "pushing it," you mean having people speak who claim that HQX was the remedy that caused their recovery - that is actually news.
Just like others are touting the success of Remdesivir.
And, who claimed that "clinical trials were a Democratic ploy to undermine Trump?"

dude we ALL saw this happening in real time here. There is no backing away from what happened. On the one side, we had people saying “we don’t know until clinical trials.” On the other hand, you had “Fire Fauci!” and Laura Ingragam claiming Democrats want to kill people, and Trump setting off a hoarding panic that meant lupus patients couldn’t get their meds.

you can’t back pedal now, no matter how hard you try.

The BARDA Director has filed a whistleblower complaint about this
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/22/rick-bright-barda-director-claims-political-retali/

Sounds like there is much more to this story.

Politico....

Anyone who disagrees with Trump is guilt of “incompetence and insubordination” in his mind. This just backs it up. He probably told Trump the truth back in January about something else, and Trump has wanted him gone ever since.

also ... if you read the ENTIRE twitter thread (instead of the one tweet you selectively posted) you see that the reporter makes extremely clear that numerous sources have reported being pressured by the Trump Admin on hydroxychloroquine, and that the sources now making claims about Bright are all inside the Trump Admin. https://threader.app/thread/1253061054659248129

If you read the article, you will find this....

Bright told The New York Times on Wednesday that he believed his removal was because of his internal opposition to pursuing investments in malaria drugs as potential treatments for Covid-19, which President Donald Trump has touted without scientific evidence. Three people with knowledge of HHS' recent acquisition of tens of millions of doses of those drugs said that Bright had supported those acquisitions in internal communications, with one official saying that Bright praised the move as a win for the health department as part of an email exchange that was first reported by Reuters last week, although Bright's message was not publicly reported.

"If Bright opposed hydroxychloroquine, he certainly didn't make that clear from his email — quite the opposite," said the official, who has seen copies of the email exchanges.

In a statement late Wednesday, an HHS official directly linked Bright's decisions to the health department's acquisition of the malaria drugs.

"As it relates to chloroquine, it was Dr. Bright who requested an Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration for donations of chloroquine that Bayer and Sandoz recently made to the Strategic National Stockpile for use on COVID-19 patients," spokesperson Caitlin Oakley said. "The EUA is what made the donated product available for use in combating COVID-19."

The selection of hydroxychloroquine as a possible candidate was not made solely because of the French trial results. The nature of the COVID-19 viral illness destroyed blood cells and produced coagulapathies, inflammation, and cytokine storm very similar to lupus. As a medical person who has been dealing with drug shortages for the past ten years - most recently this year with the shortage of IgG ( look up the conditions who suffered as a result - devastating people with ALS, neurological degenerative diseases, etc) AMONG MANY OTHER SHORTAGES, it was reasonable to obtain supply before full results were out. On the other hand, I can see the outrage if this drug were not obtainable - “TRUMP DIDN’T ACT SOON ENOUGH TO OBTAin LIFE SAVING DRUG....BLOOD ON HIS HANDS.” And all the accompanying hysteria. You can slam him both ways, but you look stupid doing it.

At this time, there are no specific therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with COVID-19, hospitals doctors and scientist have understood this, in spite of the lay people trying to make Trump’s statements more than they are. If you would like an excellent review of current treatment studies, I encourage you to follow this link to see what hospitals, doctors and researchers are actually doing, rather than using hype to guide your emotions.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144665/

What is a medical person?

10 bucks says this shmuck works in pharma or medical device sales. It would explain the affinity for Trump.

+1. Clearly not a doctor, PA, nurse or researcher. So that leaves salesperson, medical billing or receptionist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

You: "Only idiots would actually believe what the President says."

He has terrible judgment and is unfit to be President.

No a Fauci said it best, which was: data needed to be reviewed. He said it on national TV, standing next to Trump. Physicians were not listening to trump, they were paying attention to Fauci. I expect physicians to critically evaluate data and use evidence based practices. that has been the prevailing guidance of treatments and the standard of care for years now. Many years. I’m pointing out that lay people think they have a “gotcha moment”. When they really don’t. You’re trying too hard.

You, again: "Only idiots actually listen to our President."

It is morally wrong for him to speculate that this drug may be "biggest game changers in the history of medicine." You may be an expert "medical person" but it is plain for even Kindergartners to see.

x1 million

He's unfit for POTUS. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

For the umpteenth time, what is a "medical person"?

Yes, when the President called an unproven treatment "a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine" that did confuse me. Grownups don't talk that way.

Trump is entitled to an opinion based on the information he saw. Non medical people often speak about medical developments. There were multiple opinions presented on that very same day, some by trump, and a more cautious response at the exact same time by Dr. Fauci.

A medical person is the least educated in medical hierarchy. I have no scientific background whatsoever, I do not treat patients, or work in critical care, I do not understand infectious diseases, virology, or pharmacology, I have not spent decades in school with advanced degrees, never done independent research, never published papers, and I have an elementary school education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

For the umpteenth time, what is a "medical person"?

Yes, when the President called an unproven treatment "a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine" that did confuse me. Grownups don't talk that way.

Trump is entitled to an opinion based on the information he saw. Non medical people often speak about medical developments. There were multiple opinions presented on that very same day, some by trump, and a more cautious response at the exact same time by Dr. Fauci.

A medical person is the least educated in medical hierarchy. I have no scientific background whatsoever, I do not treat patients, or work in critical care, I do not understand infectious diseases, virology, or pharmacology, I have not spent decades in school with advanced degrees, never done independent research, never published papers, and I have an elementary school education.

You: "Trump is entitled to air his opinions on Twitter and national television, no matter how harmful or poorly informed they are."

His behavior is indefensible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Donald Trump on Twitter, March 21:
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains.


You can't rug sweep or minimize this. What he wrote is completely incorrect, dangerously irresponsible and frankly absurd. This is not a political issue. He has terrible judgment.

For the umpteenth time, there were many reasons beyond the French studies which made this drug a reasonable candidate. Trump is not a medical person, he has no prescriptive powers in any hospital or clinic. You must think doctors are idiots. Did you think Trump was a doctor and did that confuse you?

For the umpteenth time, what is a "medical person"?

Yes, when the President called an unproven treatment "a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine" that did confuse me. Grownups don't talk that way.

Trump is entitled to an opinion based on the information he saw. Non medical people often speak about medical developments. There were multiple opinions presented on that very same day, some by trump, and a more cautious response at the exact same time by Dr. Fauci.

A medical person is the least educated in medical hierarchy. I have no scientific background whatsoever, I do not treat patients, or work in critical care, I do not understand infectious diseases, virology, or pharmacology, I have not spent decades in school with advanced degrees, never done independent research, never published papers, and I have an elementary school education.

You: "Trump is entitled to air his opinions on Twitter and national television, no matter how harmful or poorly informed they are."

His behavior is indefensible.

Fauci was right next to him with an expert opinion. I never want to hear another Hollywood elite or politician, whining about anything which they have no expertise ever again. So I assume you hold Democrat’s to the same standard, right?