Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I'm glad they feel secure enough to establish their own lives for themselves rather than being bound to outdated norms. If nothing else, given the open racism of the British press, I think it would be good for Archie to be shielded from it a bit more as he grows up.

Harry is a prince. He's outdated. And he wants to have it both ways.

They keep saying how close the brothers are. Even if they're not as close as they were before, I didn't expect this behavior from Harry.

I guess you (and the rest of the Royal family) didn’t listen to him in South Africa.

He’s endured three years of Meghan being abused DAILY by the British starting with this first piece in 2016.



The Firm has had a good six months to come up with a solution since South Africa and done nothing.

So Harry is.

Is there any other article to fit your narrative????

Did you see Prince Charles walk Meghan down he aisle at her wedding? And the Queen take Meghan on one of her first royal engagements? And see photos of the Queen and Prince Phillip Meeting Archie? And the Queen saying in her Christmas speech how wonderful it was to have Archie born?

Your selective choice of media to fit your narrative is appalling. The Royal Family has bent over backwards to welcome Meghan. Meghan not a victim.

The Royal Family isn't the media....

Meghan and Harry created their own problems by jet-setting, being really weird and secretive about Archie and dissing royal protocol.

It just kills you that they're happily married and you're irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I'm glad they feel secure enough to establish their own lives for themselves rather than being bound to outdated norms. If nothing else, given the open racism of the British press, I think it would be good for Archie to be shielded from it a bit more as he grows up.

Harry is a prince. He's outdated. And he wants to have it both ways.

They keep saying how close the brothers are. Even if they're not as close as they were before, I didn't expect this behavior from Harry.

I guess you (and the rest of the Royal family) didn’t listen to him in South Africa.

He’s endured three years of Meghan being abused DAILY by the British starting with this first piece in 2016.



The Firm has had a good six months to come up with a solution since South Africa and done nothing.

So Harry is.

Is there any other article to fit your narrative????

You’re kidding right? Jesus.

Just par for the course —- Kate, Sophie, Fergie, Diana were treated to far worse. How is Meghan’s treatment racist or worse?

Simple answer? All those women became off-limits post wedding.

Are you joking? You must be new to royal watching. Remember Duchess of Pork for Fergie? Waity Kaity or Lazy Kate is brought up almost daily here on DCUM by MM stans. But poor, poor Meghan! Such a victim!

[Anonymous]

I’m Canadian from Vancouver island where Harry and Meghan were holidaying. Canadians won’t bother them on the west coast. Toronto is gross so hopefully they choose BC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I give it one year with Harry stuck in the provinces totally cut off from his family, friends, and traditions until he hightails it back to London.

I'll put that on a shelf with the predictions that their marriage wouldn't last a year.

Yes I’m sure you will. You seem pretty invested in them.

[Anonymous]

Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I'm glad they feel secure enough to establish their own lives for themselves rather than being bound to outdated norms. If nothing else, given the open racism of the British press, I think it would be good for Archie to be shielded from it a bit more as he grows up.

Harry is a prince. He's outdated. And he wants to have it both ways.

They keep saying how close the brothers are. Even if they're not as close as they were before, I didn't expect this behavior from Harry.

I guess you (and the rest of the Royal family) didn’t listen to him in South Africa.

He’s endured three years of Meghan being abused DAILY by the British starting with this first piece in 2016.



The Firm has had a good six months to come up with a solution since South Africa and done nothing.

So Harry is.

Is there any other article to fit your narrative????

Did you see Prince Charles walk Meghan down he aisle at her wedding? And the Queen take Meghan on one of her first royal engagements? And see photos of the Queen and Prince Phillip Meeting Archie? And the Queen saying in her Christmas speech how wonderful it was to have Archie born?

Your selective choice of media to fit your narrative is appalling. The Royal Family has bent over backwards to welcome Meghan. Meghan not a victim.

The Royal Family isn't the media....

Meghan and Harry created their own problems by jet-setting, being really weird and secretive about Archie and dissing royal protocol.

It just kills you that they're happily married and you're irrelevant.

Typical debating personal attack by someone who has no rebuttal. Truth hurts about Meghan!

[Anonymous]

Im reminded of all of the stories that the queen never forgave her uncle for abdicating. Obviously Harry is nowhere near first in line, so it isn’t the same sort of abdication, but I would love to know if this is viewed (by the queen) as a similar shirking of responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I give it one year with Harry stuck in the provinces totally cut off from his family, friends, and traditions until he hightails it back to London.

I'll put that on a shelf with the predictions that their marriage wouldn't last a year.

Same.

I don’t know why all these people are complaining. You wanted Meghan gone, she’s gone.

Oh, she took the most popular royal in Britain with her? TOO BAD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

Ahahaha I’m looking forward to what the tabloids come up with now.

No more palace sources and they can’t afford to follow the Sussexes around the world like the US media can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I'm glad they feel secure enough to establish their own lives for themselves rather than being bound to outdated norms. If nothing else, given the open racism of the British press, I think it would be good for Archie to be shielded from it a bit more as he grows up.

Harry is a prince. He's outdated. And he wants to have it both ways.

They keep saying how close the brothers are. Even if they're not as close as they were before, I didn't expect this behavior from Harry.

I guess you (and the rest of the Royal family) didn’t listen to him in South Africa.

He’s endured three years of Meghan being abused DAILY by the British starting with this first piece in 2016.



The Firm has had a good six months to come up with a solution since South Africa and done nothing.

So Harry is.

Is there any other article to fit your narrative????

You’re kidding right? Jesus.

Just par for the course —- Kate, Sophie, Fergie, Diana were treated to far worse. How is Meghan’s treatment racist or worse?

Simple answer? All those women became off-limits post wedding.

Are you joking? You must be new to royal watching. Remember Duchess of Pork for Fergie? Waity Kaity or Lazy Kate is brought up almost daily here on DCUM by MM stans. But poor, poor Meghan! Such a victim!

Calling Kate lazy (she is) and saying Meghan sponsors TERRORISM are different classes of treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

DCUM readers —- see what Meghan’s vile stans are like?!!!! They make fun of Prince George’s clothes from his Christmas photo shoot with the Queen. And make fun of Prince Charles’s swollen fingers, obviously due to some unannounced medical condition.

MM attracts the most vicious fans. They are all over Twitter, some even hoping for the death of William and his children so Meghan and Harry will take the throne. They are disgusting followers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Im reminded of all of the stories that the queen never forgave her uncle for abdicating. Obviously Harry is nowhere near first in line, so it isn’t the same sort of abdication, but I would love to know if this is viewed (by the queen) as a similar shirking of responsibility.

Not the same scenario. The Queen and her mother hated Wallis Simpson for taking away Edward and forcing King George into an early death (in their opinion). Harry isn’t harming anyone.

[Anonymous]

Why didn’t she hook a Canadian rich guy?

[Anonymous]

I’m so confused. For weeks/months many of the posters on this site having been saying that Harry and Meghan should leave the UK. That they should “go away”. Now that they are leaving, it’s all “How date he leave his family !?!?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. For weeks/months many of the posters on this site having been saying that Harry and Meghan should leave the UK. That they should “go away”. Now that they are leaving, it’s all “How date he leave his family !?!?”

No one cares if they are leaving. It’s more how it was announced — dissing his family. And no one wants them to keep their titles, protection officers, tax-payer money if they are going to line their own pockets by selling out the Royal Family name.