GT/AAP Appeals WISC Scores
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
NNAT 139
FX cogat 94% WISC 133 GBRS 10 Chances? |
Anonymous
99% |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
| +2 I can't believe your child did not get in during first round. |
Anonymous
| Because low GBRS! |
Anonymous
| 10 isn't that low, considering the FxAT and NNAT scores were consistently near or above benchmark. |
Anonymous
| Under 12 means low GBRS score! |
Anonymous
There could have been an assumption of "prepping." |
Anonymous
| Fx cogat is new.. How can it be prepared? |
Anonymous
| The teacher submitted works with wrong answers. We didn't submitted any works. We should have prepared well in first round. |
Anonymous
| I just called the app office and they said that decision letter sent last Friday 6/21. did anyone received the letter? |
Anonymous
Not sure if the questions were all that different from on the previous CogAT? If you drilled with practice tests for regular CogAT you could still have had an advantage on FxAT? I could not say since I have not seen practice tests for either one, but it seems from previous threads that if the test scores are high but not backed up by the GBRS the selection committee may have a suspicion of prepping. Or maybe they think the work quality won't be that high, or the need for AAP isn't there, despite the test scores. Whatever the reason it is not uncommon for high scores to not overcome low(ish) GBRS, except in the case of WISC. |
Anonymous
We are #7 on the list. In on appeal.
|
Anonymous
Number 13 on the list, just got the letter, in! Additional data: combined WISC 140 (99.6%), NNAT2 142 (99%), and FxAT 84%.
|
Anonymous
|