Oscars red carpet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

DP
I would be delighted to look half as unattractive as Zandaya - her beauty is natural and transcendent

I also appreciate that she seems like one of the few young stars who hasn’t gone crazy with the injections or the surgeries.

Are most 29 year olds going crazy with injections and surgeries? Hollywood is a messed up place if that’s true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

Agree. And some of these women are not thin due to ozempic. Demi has looked this way for decades now. I think some of those women limit carbs, eat no sugar, and work out a couple hours a day. Anniston is another like that. I don’t even think it’s really an eating disorder — they are actually probably really healthy but I would be homicidal if I lived like that. But I do know people who really love a lean chicken breast over bulgar with kale followed by an hour of Pilates.

I admit it totally don’t know but Kidman has the look to me of someone who is so stressed out by her perfectionism that she has diarrhea almost every day. She just seems so, so tightly wound.

I guarantee you that all of these people are using a GLP 1 in addition to their highly disordered eating.

Just stop. Sure, some of them use GLP-1. Others don't and always have been - and always will be - thin. Zendaya, for one.

Zendaya is also so young — I was so thin in my 20s and could eat like a linebacker while staying a size 2. Sigh. Now I diet constantly to stay a size 10. Who knows if she’ll be thin forever but it’s probably pretty easy for her now.

Research has shown that metabolism is fairly stable from 20 to 60.

I know they say that, and maybe it’s true for some people. But I bet if you just studied people who are very thin in their teens and 20s, maybe there would be a difference? There’s definitely a thing with some women who are effortlessly thin when young who then chunk out in middle age.

I know that research says that metabolism stays stable, my family must be outliers. My DH has always been a skinny guy, but he eats so much less now in his 50s than when he was in his 20s and 30s. I eat a lot less to maintain a weight similar to what I weighed in my 20s. My DD, who is similar in height and weight to me and in her 20s, eats a lot more than I do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

DP
I would be delighted to look half as unattractive as Zandaya - her beauty is natural and transcendent

I also appreciate that she seems like one of the few young stars who hasn’t gone crazy with the injections or the surgeries.

+1 !!

[Anonymous]

Thank you for posting photos!

I personally think style-wise all the women looked amazing on the red carpet this year - - no misses really.

Even Kylie Jenner looked great though a little too exposed at the top.
👀

[Anonymous]

I don't want to repost the whole post, because it's long, but the photos of the actresses from 3-4 years ago make me really sad. So many of them look AWFUL now. Emma Stone looked so much livelier a few years ago. I didn't like her Oscar dress, but at the same time, who else could wear it but a waif?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't want to repost the whole post, because it's long, but the photos of the actresses from 3-4 years ago make me really sad. So many of them look AWFUL now. Emma Stone looked so much livelier a few years ago. I didn't like her Oscar dress, but at the same time, who else could wear it but a waif?

I don't think that dress would have looked good on anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't want to repost the whole post, because it's long, but the photos of the actresses from 3-4 years ago make me really sad. So many of them look AWFUL now. Emma Stone looked so much livelier a few years ago. I didn't like her Oscar dress, but at the same time, who else could wear it but a waif?

Sorry, 3-9 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting photos!

I personally think style-wise all the women looked amazing on the red carpet this year - - no misses really.

Even Kylie Jenner looked great though a little too exposed at the top.
👀

I agree there were fewer misses than usual and even the stuff I didn't like, I don't think was horrible -- just not my thing. The only dress I thought was a true fashion don't was Paltrow's.

I also thought Inga Ibsdotter Lilleas' dress was a miss -- trying to be avant garden but it just looks like her dress has a growth that needs to be checked out:

[Anonymous]

Phoebe Tonkin in old Dior (John Galliano years)... we need to bring back real silk instead of using this cheap viscose crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want to repost the whole post, because it's long, but the photos of the actresses from 3-4 years ago make me really sad. So many of them look AWFUL now. Emma Stone looked so much livelier a few years ago. I didn't like her Oscar dress, but at the same time, who else could wear it but a waif?

I don't think that dress would have looked good on anyone.

I get the vibe of the dress -- it's got a Jane Austen heroine vibe and the fabric looked kind of magical. I just think it looked unnecessarily uncomfortable to wear and needed something more to make it work -- more jewelry, a more defined hairstyle, something. You could also tell they had to tape it to her shoulders and chest to keep it in place and it made her look so stiff and uncomfortable -- why do such a low scoop neck and back if that's how she's going to have to wear it? A shallower scoop that would have allowed her to wear it more naturally would have been prettier and more practical.

It wound up feeling like a costume that needed movie magic to make work and that's not what fashion is supposed to be. These are clothes. You should be able to wear them without special tricks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Phoebe Tonkin in old Dior (John Galliano years)... we need to bring back real silk instead of using this cheap viscose crap.

No idea who this is but I do love the color.

What celeb is wearing viscose on the Oscar red carpet?!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ripa is actually very curvy naturally but she diets so extremely which has shrunk her body. Her daughter looks like her when she was younger in terms of her normal body type.

What? She has *never* been very curvy. Her natural body type is a little tiny thing. Always has been.

Kelly Ripa was much more curvy in her early years, even had some cleavage. While she wasn't overweight, I wouldn't call her a "little tiny thing" back then.

Kelly from her soap opera days:

Again, normal, not tiny.

I mean, she is tiny -- that's her husband, Marc Consuelos, who is also tiny. It think Kelly and Marc have shared orthorexia (they exercise together a lot and I think knowing the other is also very small pushes them to keep at it because neither wants to be the "big" one of the partner when they are photographed together. I'm sure they also have a chef/nutritionist who keeps their house free of sugar or any fat except like lean salmon or any processed foods. I think it being a joint endeavor likely makes the obsession worse and helps with the "discipline" it takes to be that small in their mid-50s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want to repost the whole post, because it's long, but the photos of the actresses from 3-4 years ago make me really sad. So many of them look AWFUL now. Emma Stone looked so much livelier a few years ago. I didn't like her Oscar dress, but at the same time, who else could wear it but a waif?

I don't think that dress would have looked good on anyone.

I get the vibe of the dress -- it's got a Jane Austen heroine vibe and the fabric looked kind of magical. I just think it looked unnecessarily uncomfortable to wear and needed something more to make it work -- more jewelry, a more defined hairstyle, something. You could also tell they had to tape it to her shoulders and chest to keep it in place and it made her look so stiff and uncomfortable -- why do such a low scoop neck and back if that's how she's going to have to wear it? A shallower scoop that would have allowed her to wear it more naturally would have been prettier and more practical.

It wound up feeling like a costume that needed movie magic to make work and that's not what fashion is supposed to be. These are clothes. You should be able to wear them without special tricks.

+1 and adding that dress was custom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Phoebe Tonkin in old Dior (John Galliano years)... we need to bring back real silk instead of using this cheap viscose crap.

This is REALLY pretty. Love the color.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

I hate this. I don't think the gold suits her and I hate the neckband and wristbands.

It looks like something Carrie fisher wore in Star Wars.