Oscars red carpet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kim Kardashian wearing what looks like blue contacts. I really hope this is her actual hair because the shorter cut looks great.

She couldn't walk in that dress, which makes it an immediate fail.

I don't get why she always seems to do this. Just add a slit? She seems to always be stuck in her clothes not able to move but form fitting doesn't dictate it has to be this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kim Kardashian wearing what looks like blue contacts. I really hope this is her actual hair because the shorter cut looks great.

She couldn't walk in that dress, which makes it an immediate fail.

I don't get why she always seems to do this. Just add a slit? She seems to always be stuck in her clothes not able to move but form fitting doesn't dictate it has to be this way.

She stumbled and almost hit the ground in that outfit. Also, her face has morphed via plastic surgery into a new face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kim Kardashian wearing what looks like blue contacts. I really hope this is her actual hair because the shorter cut looks great.

She couldn't walk in that dress, which makes it an immediate fail.

I don't get why she always seems to do this. Just add a slit? She seems to always be stuck in her clothes not able to move but form fitting doesn't dictate it has to be this way.

The metaphor here just leaps off the page.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heidi Klum wore something normal for once! This is actually great.

I like it too. Almost didn't recognize her.

This makes her mid section look plump. I don’t like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

I hate this. I don't think the gold suits her and I hate the neckband and wristbands.

Agree. It's so matronly. The phrase, a "handsome woman" comes to mind.

She’s 76 so maybe she felt anxious about not dressing mutton as lamb. But I agree it could have been a little less…buttoned up. Either a more open neckline or more open sleeves. I like the color on her though and I think the silhouette is also in keeping with her general style. I think she looks 10 years younger than her age, at least!

Kathy Bates is 77 and looks MUCH better in this dress - also age appropriate, but more feminine and just plain prettier than Sigourney's dress.

This is lovely but she was the only one in the Reiners memorial segment who wasn’t wearing black which I didn’t love.

OMG.

Sorry, but if I were the only person on stage sticking out like this I would be mortified. This was custom and could have been done in a darker color.

Who cares. Seriously.

Maybe she wasn't asked to be part of the segment until just before? If the dress was custom tailored for her, she may not have had time to pivot to a darker color.

I’m the one who wondered how long these things are planned in advance, so maybe? But she was the only representative from Misery which was in the montage.

I think Demi Moore got lucky with the color of her dress - in the sense that it was dark. I think that dress was also planned well ahead of time.

Moore won last year so she knew for a full year that she was going to present at the Oscars, though. I don’t think anyone else in the tribute had any other reason to be there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No words.

did they have different mothers or something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

I hate this. I don't think the gold suits her and I hate the neckband and wristbands.

Agree. It's so matronly. The phrase, a "handsome woman" comes to mind.

She’s 76 so maybe she felt anxious about not dressing mutton as lamb. But I agree it could have been a little less…buttoned up. Either a more open neckline or more open sleeves. I like the color on her though and I think the silhouette is also in keeping with her general style. I think she looks 10 years younger than her age, at least!

Kathy Bates is 77 and looks MUCH better in this dress - also age appropriate, but more feminine and just plain prettier than Sigourney's dress.

This is lovely but she was the only one in the Reiners memorial segment who wasn’t wearing black which I didn’t love.

OMG.

Sorry, but if I were the only person on stage sticking out like this I would be mortified. This was custom and could have been done in a darker color.

That wasn’t the point of the whole night. I’m more worried about the brown shoes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

Agree. And some of these women are not thin due to ozempic. Demi has looked this way for decades now. I think some of those women limit carbs, eat no sugar, and work out a couple hours a day. Anniston is another like that. I don’t even think it’s really an eating disorder — they are actually probably really healthy but I would be homicidal if I lived like that. But I do know people who really love a lean chicken breast over bulgar with kale followed by an hour of Pilates.

I admit it totally don’t know but Kidman has the look to me of someone who is so stressed out by her perfectionism that she has diarrhea almost every day. She just seems so, so tightly wound.

This is just straight up insane. OF COURSE IT'S AN EATING DISORDER.

Are you one of those ignorant people who think every thin person has an eating disorder? My mother, my best friend and my son are all underweight naturally and have tiny appetites. They're genetically programmed that way. All three have been on weight-gaining diets at some point in their lives.

Also, plump people can have eating disorders too, just so you know. The size you see has NOTHING to do with the existence of an eating disorder.

+1000000000000000000000000000000

FFS, don't gaslight us with this BS about "naturally underweight." Here is what Nicole Kidman looked like in her late 20s:





Here is Demi Moore, also in her 20s:




Emma Stone, 9 years ago:




Ariana Grande, a few years back:



Cynthia Erivo, in 2022




These women are not "naturally" underweight. They are emaciated. They are starving themselves.

I normally really hate the body shaming of female celebs, who are already under so much pressure appearance-wise, including the shaming of thin women for being thin.

But it's very hard to argue with this post. These are all beautiful women but there's no question that across the board, they are all significantly thinner than they were 10 or 20 (or 30) years ago. And none were heavy to begin with -- they were all already thin, but with some actual normal body fat and *some* curves. Without singling anyone out, it's absolutely true that there is a downward trend in terms of actress's weight in the last decade or so, and it's just not possible that it's healthy (or is having a healthy impact on people watching them from home). It's probably not just ozempic -- I suspect it's a combination of weight loss drugs, orthorexia, the obsession with "clean" eating that can often be a mask for disordered eating, and just plain old fashioned dieting. But this can't be good, it's so extreme.

They all look hideously skinny

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Her ass doesn’t look that good, though. I actually like the stark simplicity of the front for a woman of a certain age. But the side view is tragic.

It does look good for someone in their 50s who I suspect has not had plastic surgery done (I think this is a point of personal pride for her). But that doesn't mean the dress is flattering or that it is worthwhile for everyone to go look at her butt. She looks good for her age and also she has some age appropriate sagging and dimpling. No shame at all, I have the same (and also look good for my age!) but it's just going to invite people to comment on how her butt isn't good enough for this look. When in reality, this dress is only going to look good on a supermodel because of the amount of exposure. She's naked.

This whole time I’ve thought Paltrow was in her late 60s. She’s only 53?! Why do all these Hollywood women look so old? It’s horrible.

White women generally look super old super fast.

Wut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No words.

Who is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

I hate this. I don't think the gold suits her and I hate the neckband and wristbands.

Agree. It's so matronly. The phrase, a "handsome woman" comes to mind.

She’s 76 so maybe she felt anxious about not dressing mutton as lamb. But I agree it could have been a little less…buttoned up. Either a more open neckline or more open sleeves. I like the color on her though and I think the silhouette is also in keeping with her general style. I think she looks 10 years younger than her age, at least!

Kathy Bates is 77 and looks MUCH better in this dress - also age appropriate, but more feminine and just plain prettier than Sigourney's dress.

This is lovely but she was the only one in the Reiners memorial segment who wasn’t wearing black which I didn’t love.

OMG.

Sorry, but if I were the only person on stage sticking out like this I would be mortified. This was custom and could have been done in a darker color.

Who cares. Seriously.

Maybe she wasn't asked to be part of the segment until just before? If the dress was custom tailored for her, she may not have had time to pivot to a darker color.

I’m the one who wondered how long these things are planned in advance, so maybe? But she was the only representative from Misery which was in the montage.

I think Demi Moore got lucky with the color of her dress - in the sense that it was dark. I think that dress was also planned well ahead of time.

Moore won last year so she knew for a full year that she was going to present at the Oscars, though. I don’t think anyone else in the tribute had any other reason to be there.

Moore didn't win last year. Mikey Madison did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No words.

Who is that?

Donatella Versace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No words.

Who is that?

Donatella Versace.

What an unattractive "human."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No words.

Who is that?

Donatella Versace.

Italian aging?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No words.

Who is that?

Donatella Versace.

Italian aging?

The constant suntanning and cigs kind, yes.