Oscars red carpet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

I hate this. I don't think the gold suits her and I hate the neckband and wristbands.

Agree. It's so matronly. The phrase, a "handsome woman" comes to mind.

She’s 76 so maybe she felt anxious about not dressing mutton as lamb. But I agree it could have been a little less…buttoned up. Either a more open neckline or more open sleeves. I like the color on her though and I think the silhouette is also in keeping with her general style. I think she looks 10 years younger than her age, at least!

Kathy Bates is 77 and looks MUCH better in this dress - also age appropriate, but more feminine and just plain prettier than Sigourney's dress.

This is lovely but she was the only one in the Reiners memorial segment who wasn’t wearing black which I didn’t love.

OMG.

[Anonymous]

I think my favorite look of the evening was Zendaya. She is magnificent and always knows exactly how to carry herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think my favorite look of the evening was Zendaya. She is magnificent and always knows exactly how to carry herself.

My top 3 were this, Rose Byrne, and Wunmi Mosaic's green sequined dress.

I also liked both Jessie Buckley's pink and red dress and Amy Madigan's feather jacket -- I like when the winner's clothes really suit them in a very specific way. Both of those will be memorable wins for me in part because of the clothes they were wearing.

[Anonymous]

^Mosaku not Mosaic. Autocorrect!

[Anonymous]

Not sure if anyone has noted this yet, but Buckley's Chanel dress was inspired by the dress Grace Kelly wore to the Oscars 70 years ago. You can read a bit more about it here: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/jessie-buckley-chanel-grace-kelly

I thought it suited her really well and worked especially well with her current haircut and color.

[Anonymous]

I wonder what the 10 year effects will be of these women have have dropped weight they didn’t have to lose in their 40s, 50s, 60s and are now waif like. I wonder if it affects bone density?

Models used to do the ultra skinny heroine look but that is when they were in their teens and twenties. I wonder what the health risks are of these women of dropping to the skeletal look later in life. This was not the intended purpose of these drugs and I doubt they have really even been studied in women later in life who were already thin before they started then and lost weight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

I think zendaya looks great. She has always been skinny like that even when she was on Disney, I think it is just how she is built.

+1
Nicole Kidman is another who has always, always been tall and very thin and probably will be for the rest of her life. Some people just can't stand it, I guess.

I bet Nicole Kidman weighs 30 pounds less now than she did when she was a normal thin woman in her 30s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if anyone has noted this yet, but Buckley's Chanel dress was inspired by the dress Grace Kelly wore to the Oscars 70 years ago. You can read a bit more about it here: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/jessie-buckley-chanel-grace-kelly

I thought it suited her really well and worked especially well with her current haircut and color.

I really liked this dress too. The color combo is so surprising but it suited her perfectly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

DP
I would be delighted to look half as unattractive as Zandaya - her beauty is natural and transcendent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

DP
I would be delighted to look half as unattractive as Zandaya - her beauty is natural and transcendent

Haha seriously. It’s not my favorite color dress but the fit and drape are lovely on her and she’s beautiful in almost anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if anyone has noted this yet, but Buckley's Chanel dress was inspired by the dress Grace Kelly wore to the Oscars 70 years ago. You can read a bit more about it here: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/jessie-buckley-chanel-grace-kelly

I thought it suited her really well and worked especially well with her current haircut and color.

I really liked this dress too. The color combo is so surprising but it suited her perfectly.

Me too. I wasn’t sure at first and then I saw all the others and thought she looks beautiful and not over done. Hair not too severe, dress not too revealing or weird, nice colors that complement her skin and hair rather than compete or wash her out, and slender but doesn’t look like a stick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ripa is actually very curvy naturally but she diets so extremely which has shrunk her body. Her daughter looks like her when she was younger in terms of her normal body type.

What? She has *never* been very curvy. Her natural body type is a little tiny thing. Always has been.

Kelly Ripa was much more curvy in her early years, even had some cleavage. While she wasn't overweight, I wouldn't call her a "little tiny thing" back then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ripa is actually very curvy naturally but she diets so extremely which has shrunk her body. Her daughter looks like her when she was younger in terms of her normal body type.

What? She has *never* been very curvy. Her natural body type is a little tiny thing. Always has been.

Kelly Ripa was much more curvy in her early years, even had some cleavage. While she wasn't overweight, I wouldn't call her a "little tiny thing" back then.

Kelly from her soap opera days:

Again, normal, not tiny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.

+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.

Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.

That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).

+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.

Of course people come in all shapes and sizes. Some of those shapes and sizes look unattractive, like Zendaya’s.

DP
I would be delighted to look half as unattractive as Zandaya - her beauty is natural and transcendent

I also appreciate that she seems like one of the few young stars who hasn’t gone crazy with the injections or the surgeries.

[Anonymous]

Correct. Kelly Ripa also starves herself. I believe we have a term for that.