University of Richmond thoughts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh.

No one thinks Richmond is in the same league with Oberlin or Kenyon. I applied to Kenyon. Didn’t get in. Never would have considered Richmond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

You wish, geed. The only way to "manipulate," for instance, graduation rate, retention rate, and per-student endowment, three of USNWR's weightiest metrics, is to retain more students, graduate more students, and have more money. All of which directly speak to the quality of education and the student experience. It isn't just shuffling numbers on a spreadsheet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh.

No one thinks Richmond is in the same league with Oberlin or Kenyon. I applied to Kenyon. Didn’t get in. Never would have considered Richmond.

The rankings are meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

You wish, geed. The only way to "manipulate," for instance, graduation rate, retention rate, and per-student endowment, three of USNWR's weightiest metrics, is to retain more students, graduate more students, and have more money. All of which directly speak to the quality of education and the student experience. It isn't just shuffling numbers on a spreadsheet.

You obviously are totally clueless about methodology. What are they measuring? Also, the rankings are all over the place. Why one over the other? We all know what Richmond is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh.

Those rankings make total sense, especially when you look at outcomes, which is the most important factor. The only place Oberlin should rank higher than Richmond is on the woke list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh.

No one thinks Richmond is in the same league with Oberlin or Kenyon. I applied to Kenyon. Didn’t get in. Never would have considered Richmond.

The rankings are meaningless.

No one who cites “rankings” is being serious. If that’s how you select your school god help you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

You wish, geed. The only way to "manipulate," for instance, graduation rate, retention rate, and per-student endowment, three of USNWR's weightiest metrics, is to retain more students, graduate more students, and have more money. All of which directly speak to the quality of education and the student experience. It isn't just shuffling numbers on a spreadsheet.

You obviously are totally clueless about methodology. What are they measuring? Also, the rankings are all over the place. Why one over the other? We all know what Richmond is.

What do you mean what are they measuring? I just named three major objective and quantifiable factors. None of which can be easily gamed or manipulated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it.

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane.

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute.

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you.

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh.

No one thinks Richmond is in the same league with Oberlin or Kenyon. I applied to Kenyon. Didn’t get in. Never would have considered Richmond.

You saved yourself some time filling out a Richmond application. You wouldn't have gotten in.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it. [/quote]

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane. [/quote]

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.
[/quote]

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute. [/quote]

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.[/quote]

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you. [/quote]

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh. [/quote]

Those rankings make total sense, especially when you look at outcomes, which is the most important factor. The only place Oberlin should rank higher than Richmond is on the woke list.[/quote]


Richmond does not rank especially well in “outcomes”. Payscale lists it as being very low for starting and mid career salaries, which is concerning given that it’s so close to the DMV. High cost areas = high salaries. Not so for Richmond.

It also doesn’t do well when it comes to sending kids to elite law schools and med school. The data is out there. I will post it if you want. I’d suggest you find it.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just visited. It’s lovely and I have no idea why there’s so much hate about it. [/quote]

Over $80,000 for state school! That’s insane. [/quote]

It’s a private school. If that’s out of budget, don’t consider it. That’s the way this process works.
[/quote]

That’s even worse! $80,000 a year for a non-name regional college. I guess there’s a sucker born every minute. [/quote]

No-name regional college? Are you 'tarted? It's the #22 ranked LAC. It ranks higher than Haverford, Colby, and Bates! Your kid must not have gotten in.[/quote]

Rankings mean nothing. Easily manipulated. It’s mid-tier. Always has been. Always will be. But you do you. [/quote]

No one pays ANY attention to rankings. If you look at them they make no sense. At all. Kenyon #45. Oberlin #55. Richmond #22. Yeah. Right. Nice one. Makes me laugh. [/quote]

Those rankings make total sense, especially when you look at outcomes, which is the most important factor. The only place Oberlin should rank higher than Richmond is on the woke list.[/quote]


Richmond does not rank especially well in “outcomes”. Payscale lists it as being very low for starting and mid career salaries, which is concerning given that it’s so close to the DMV. High cost areas = high salaries. Not so for Richmond.

It also doesn’t do well when it comes to sending kids to elite law schools and med school. The data is out there. I will post it if you want. I’d suggest you find it. [/quote]

Might as well cite your brother in law's blog if you're going to cite Payscale. Totally 'tarted "source."

[Anonymous]

Richmond does not rank especially well in “outcomes”. Payscale lists it as being very low for starting and mid career salaries, which is concerning given that it’s so close to the DMV. High cost areas = high salaries. Not so for Richmond.

It also doesn’t do well when it comes to sending kids to elite law schools and med school. The data is out there. I will post it if you want. I’d suggest you find it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Daughter was accepted with a full ride three years ago. Everyone she asked at the school (and what she saw on her own) said that the white and black kids don't socialize together. That was a problem for my mixed race kid who enjoys a diverse friend group. She went elsewhere.

Troubling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Richmond does not rank especially well in “outcomes”. Payscale lists it as being very low for starting and mid career salaries, which is concerning given that it’s so close to the DMV. High cost areas = high salaries. Not so for Richmond.

It also doesn’t do well when it comes to sending kids to elite law schools and med school. The data is out there. I will post it if you want. I’d suggest you find it.

Payscale is TT. We all know what that stands for. Find a real source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daughter was accepted with a full ride three years ago. Everyone she asked at the school (and what she saw on her own) said that the white and black kids don't socialize together. That was a problem for my mixed race kid who enjoys a diverse friend group. She went elsewhere.

Troubling

I'm sure it's way better at Amherst. Not.

[Anonymous]

I’ve got no dog in this fight. But Richmond has always struck me as a very strange school. Not well known. Not sure about academics. Suspect they are kind of suspect. Kids seem entitled. No thanks. I will look elsewhere.