Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

The indictment says the classified information in the photo has been removed. Perhaps it's the paper with the black bar across it.

The black bar!! That tells me EVERYTHING. Dear LORD, you people are completely gullible.

Again, so are you saying Trump didn’t have classified documents even though he turned some over later? Just trying to understand your thought process here.

My thought process, again, is that Obama, Biden, Pence and Clinton had them too. But somehow that’s “OK” and “Different”

Why were you insinuating that the boxes in the pictures didn’t have classified documents then? You seemed pretty focused on that.

Not focused, laughing at those who see closed boxes and a black bar and scream AHA! Please tell me how it was legal for Biden to have classified documents in his garage.

Okay, then why were you talking about the boxes so much and saying people were “gullible” for thinking there were classified documents in them? Do you agree that Trump had classified documents in his home?

Yep. The question is whether or not it was constitutional. If not, then he should share a cell with Biden, Clinton, Obama and Pence. You seem to be unconcerned about those individuals having classified documents in their homes as well.

Which part of the constitution talks about classified documents?

[Anonymous]

Obstruction of Justice.

That’s one of the charges.

Please tell me why you think there was no obstruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”

READ THE INDICTMENT

[Anonymous]

Ffs go to the webpage of any newspaper and read the indictment, it’s only 40 pages. You’ll see how deep the waters are yourself. He’s screwed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.

Constitution is law. Do you deny that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”

READ THE INDICTMENT

READ THIS:

https://twitter.com/dc_draino/status/1666443247416164355?s=61&t=296Ozm3aV9AVHNsVUX_Hrw

President Trump is on the record of having a standard order in order to take classified documents home. It is also in the letter that is printed and signed in the above this tweet, and it was reported right after the ‘raid’ as well by Just The News

https://twitter.com/ninenewsnancy/status/1666613574847057922?s=61&t=296Ozm3aV9AVHNsVUX_Hrw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.

Constitution is law. Do you deny that?

Not all laws are the Constitution. Please tell me, according to the Supreme Court, which portion of the Constitution was violated in that case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obstruction of Justice.

That’s one of the charges.

Please tell me why you think there was no obstruction.

“ “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns,” Roberts wrote. “It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

Rinse repeat with obstruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”

READ THE INDICTMENT

READ THIS:

https://twitter.com/dc_draino/status/1666443247416164355?s=61&t=296Ozm3aV9AVHNsVUX_Hrw

President Trump is on the record of having a standard order in order to take classified documents home. It is also in the letter that is printed and signed in the above this tweet, and it was reported right after the ‘raid’ as well by Just The News

https://twitter.com/ninenewsnancy/status/1666613574847057922?s=61&t=296Ozm3aV9AVHNsVUX_Hrw

Where is this standing order “on the record”?

[Anonymous]

Side question: is Chris Sununu a "big fat chucklehead" or a "fat-faced eunuch"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”

You can read the indictment and the transcript of the audio tape. He is, post presidency, referring to a document in his possession that is classified, and because of that he cannot hand it over to the journalist even though he wants to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.

Constitution is law. Do you deny that?

Not all laws are the Constitution. Please tell me, according to the Supreme Court, which portion of the Constitution was violated in that case?

“ “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns,” Roberts wrote. “It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

“ In writing the court’s unanimous ruling, Roberts agreed that the government and the lower courts took too broad a view of when a politician’s actions can be considered nefarious.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”

You can read the indictment and the transcript of the audio tape. He is, post presidency, referring to a document in his possession that is classified, and because of that he cannot hand it over to the journalist even though he wants to.

CNN’s exclusive transcript? How about I hear the actual audio tape. Notice how they did not produce that. Just the transcript.

Can you link to the audio tape please?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.

Constitution is law. Do you deny that?

Not all laws are the Constitution. Please tell me, according to the Supreme Court, which portion of the Constitution was violated in that case?

“ “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns,” Roberts wrote. “It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

“ In writing the court’s unanimous ruling, Roberts agreed that the government and the lower courts took too broad a view of when a politician’s actions can be considered nefarious.”

Which part of that mentions the constitution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

Irrelevant. Not a defense. Ya boy is going to prison. Cry more.

Not my boy. I really don’t give a sh*t who becomes president. If Biden stays on, it’s leftists that will pay for that with increased crime, forced penalties, etc. I’ll be laughing my a&& off, just like I do every time someone on the local politics forum whines about carjackings, etc. You broke it, you bought it.

You can say it’s irrelevant all you want but you are going to find out just how relevant it is. But you do show your true political colors and I applaud you for that honestly. See you at the next Antifa rally!

Deranged word salad.

Translation: “Oh, I didn’t get what I thought I would”