Lock him up indictment FL

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Democrats did all sorts of claims about Trump that were false. Now they are mad that Trump does the same to them.
Even Jack Smith in his press conference was talking about capitol riot, when he made no charges against Trump regarding the riot.


Ehhh... Dems made a few claims that were false, but the majority of them were in fact true and proven to be true. Yet his base was convinced the proven truths were "fake news" for absolutely no reason other than Trump said so.

In fairness, there is another important reason they don’t know any of it was true: their chosen news sources didn’t report those facts and continue to editorialize as though it was all made up.
Anonymous
Judge Cannon was asked to step aside by the Chief Justice of the Southern District of FL (CJ Altonaga, a GWB nominee) and she refused.

-Broke Southern District norms by refusing to delegate pretrial motions to more experienced (yet subordinate) magistrate judge
-One judge asked her to decline the case because it ought to take place in Miami due to the sensitivity of the documents. Cannon refused and thus taxpayers had to pay to build a SCIF at her dinky courthouse in Ft. Pierce (2 hours north of Miami) in order for Cannon to handle the case.
-Chief Judge Altonaga asked Cannon to step aside because of her prior actions in which she appointed a special master to oversee the documents instead of the normal magistrate judge, which was widely interpreted as a sign of deference to Trump. Staying on was "bad optics."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/us/politic...pBy3l&smid=url-share
Anonymous
Trump with Nuclear Codes
Trump with Nuclear Secrets
Trump with National Secrets

We are screwed.

There is no reality those words above will end well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Judge Cannon was asked to step aside by the Chief Justice of the Southern District of FL (CJ Altonaga, a GWB nominee) and she refused.

-Broke Southern District norms by refusing to delegate pretrial motions to more experienced (yet subordinate) magistrate judge
-One judge asked her to decline the case because it ought to take place in Miami due to the sensitivity of the documents. Cannon refused and thus taxpayers had to pay to build a SCIF at her dinky courthouse in Ft. Pierce (2 hours north of Miami) in order for Cannon to handle the case.
-Chief Judge Altonaga asked Cannon to step aside because of her prior actions in which she appointed a special master to oversee the documents instead of the normal magistrate judge, which was widely interpreted as a sign of deference to Trump. Staying on was "bad optics."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/us/politic...pBy3l&smid=url-share


This is disheartening.
As is SCOTUS’ slow walking of Trump’s immunity case.
It’s mind boggling that anyone who purports to care about our national security would support Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This case is over and unlike the biased NY judge, Cannon understands the first amendment


Indeed. People have a First Amendment right to engage in hyperbole, though it's perhaps not out of the realm of possibility to have occurred. Indeed, no one thought that a sitting President would ever order (through his AG) an FBI raid on a former President armed and authorized to use deadly force over a NARA document retrieval during a negotiation for their return.

There was no negotiation occurring at the time. Trump and his attorneys asserted there were no more documents at MAL that they knew of. Trump was lying and moving them around to avoid detection. He was never going to turn them over willingly. A raid was the last resort to recover the documents, as required by law. The FBI never intended to go in, guns blazing, and take people out, but their MO is to prepare for as many contingencies as possible. They have a plan *in case* things go south. In actuality, they communicated with the Secret Service before setting foot on the property the morning of the raid. They carried weapons, but didn’t use them. Everything was textbook.


Except where they placed the documents on the floor for a photo-op to convince people Trump was careless with documents. The case may get dismissed over it, as they didn't put them back in the same order, and lied to the court about it for months. Plus it was revealed that the government ordered Trump to come and get some of these boxes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Judge Cannon was asked to step aside by the Chief Justice of the Southern District of FL (CJ Altonaga, a GWB nominee) and she refused.

-Broke Southern District norms by refusing to delegate pretrial motions to more experienced (yet subordinate) magistrate judge
-One judge asked her to decline the case because it ought to take place in Miami due to the sensitivity of the documents. Cannon refused and thus taxpayers had to pay to build a SCIF at her dinky courthouse in Ft. Pierce (2 hours north of Miami) in order for Cannon to handle the case.
-Chief Judge Altonaga asked Cannon to step aside because of her prior actions in which she appointed a special master to oversee the documents instead of the normal magistrate judge, which was widely interpreted as a sign of deference to Trump. Staying on was "bad optics."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/us/politic...pBy3l&smid=url-share


This is disheartening.
As is SCOTUS’ slow walking of Trump’s immunity case.
It’s mind boggling that anyone who purports to care about our national security would support Trump.


What slow-walking? Decisions being released now were argued in November. They are fast walking the Trump case.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This case is over and unlike the biased NY judge, Cannon understands the first amendment


Indeed. People have a First Amendment right to engage in hyperbole, though it's perhaps not out of the realm of possibility to have occurred. Indeed, no one thought that a sitting President would ever order (through his AG) an FBI raid on a former President armed and authorized to use deadly force over a NARA document retrieval during a negotiation for their return.

There was no negotiation occurring at the time. Trump and his attorneys asserted there were no more documents at MAL that they knew of. Trump was lying and moving them around to avoid detection. He was never going to turn them over willingly. A raid was the last resort to recover the documents, as required by law. The FBI never intended to go in, guns blazing, and take people out, but their MO is to prepare for as many contingencies as possible. They have a plan *in case* things go south. In actuality, they communicated with the Secret Service before setting foot on the property the morning of the raid. They carried weapons, but didn’t use them. Everything was textbook.


Except where they placed the documents on the floor for a photo-op to convince people Trump was careless with documents. The case may get dismissed over it, as they didn't put them back in the same order, and lied to the court about it for months. Plus it was revealed that the government ordered Trump to come and get some of these boxes.


You really should get that hook out of your mouth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Judge Cannon was asked to step aside by the Chief Justice of the Southern District of FL (CJ Altonaga, a GWB nominee) and she refused.

-Broke Southern District norms by refusing to delegate pretrial motions to more experienced (yet subordinate) magistrate judge
-One judge asked her to decline the case because it ought to take place in Miami due to the sensitivity of the documents. Cannon refused and thus taxpayers had to pay to build a SCIF at her dinky courthouse in Ft. Pierce (2 hours north of Miami) in order for Cannon to handle the case.
-Chief Judge Altonaga asked Cannon to step aside because of her prior actions in which she appointed a special master to oversee the documents instead of the normal magistrate judge, which was widely interpreted as a sign of deference to Trump. Staying on was "bad optics."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/us/politic...pBy3l&smid=url-share


This is disheartening.
As is SCOTUS’ slow walking of Trump’s immunity case.
It’s mind boggling that anyone who purports to care about our national security would support Trump.

The damage is done, even if SCOTUS were to rule next week that he’s not immune. The trial won’t start until Fall and MAGA and MSM will claim trials aren’t allowing a fair election.

Volunteer and donate for Biden & Dems. Voting isn’t enough.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Aileen Cannon is corrupt AF.
Anonymous
Meanwhile today marks day 2 of a hearing on the validity of Jack Smith as Special Counsel. He wasnt confirmed by the senate, unlike Durham and Weiss and will crater both cases before it even has a chance to go to trail. Not looking good for the law-fare crowd.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Judge Cannon was asked to step aside by the Chief Justice of the Southern District of FL (CJ Altonaga, a GWB nominee) and she refused.

-Broke Southern District norms by refusing to delegate pretrial motions to more experienced (yet subordinate) magistrate judge
-One judge asked her to decline the case because it ought to take place in Miami due to the sensitivity of the documents. Cannon refused and thus taxpayers had to pay to build a SCIF at her dinky courthouse in Ft. Pierce (2 hours north of Miami) in order for Cannon to handle the case.
-Chief Judge Altonaga asked Cannon to step aside because of her prior actions in which she appointed a special master to oversee the documents instead of the normal magistrate judge, which was widely interpreted as a sign of deference to Trump. Staying on was "bad optics."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/us/politic...pBy3l&smid=url-share


This is disheartening.
As is SCOTUS’ slow walking of Trump’s immunity case.
It’s mind boggling that anyone who purports to care about our national security would support Trump.

Vote blue so we can fix this mess. Trump’s unfit and corrupt judges need to be revisited and the rules governing judges clearly need to be revisited as well. If we elect Republicans, it’s just going to be more of this and worse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile today marks day 2 of a hearing on the validity of Jack Smith as Special Counsel. He wasnt confirmed by the senate, unlike Durham and Weiss and will crater both cases before it even has a chance to go to trail. Not looking good for the law-fare crowd.


Zero chance she does this. She knows she would get slapped down again by the 11th circuit and probably would get removed for her rank incompetence. She has been studiously avoiding making any decisions that Smith could appeal pre-trial. She'll just sit on this for months and then eventually deny it in the fall.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

So she’s as deeply unqualified and corrupt as her critics said. And we’re stuck with her.
Anonymous
Anyone seen those new pics of Trump's boxes with the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, just released by Smith? What a friggn mess - the guy is a slob. Not surprising.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: