Reply to Lock him up indictment FL

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Omfg please read the indictment.  When you can tell me what the charges are, come back.  Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

[/quote]

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.[/quote]
Losing a case isn’t breaking the law[/quote]

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.[/quote]
That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.[/quote]

Constitution is law. Do you deny that?[/quote]
Not all laws are the Constitution. Please tell me, according to the Supreme Court, which portion of the Constitution was violated in that case? [/quote]

“ “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns,” Roberts wrote. “It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

“ In writing the court’s unanimous ruling, Roberts agreed that the government and the lower courts took too broad a view of when a politician’s actions can be considered nefarious.”[/quote]
Which part of that mentions the constitution?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics