Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

Irrelevant. Not a defense. Ya boy is going to prison. Cry more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

The indictment says the classified information in the photo has been removed. Perhaps it's the paper with the black bar across it.

The black bar!! That tells me EVERYTHING. Dear LORD, you people are completely gullible.

Again, so are you saying Trump didn’t have classified documents even though he turned some over later? Just trying to understand your thought process here.

My thought process, again, is that Obama, Biden, Pence and Clinton had them too. But somehow that’s “OK” and “Different”

Why were you insinuating that the boxes in the pictures didn’t have classified documents then? You seemed pretty focused on that.

Not focused, laughing at those who see closed boxes and a black bar and scream AHA! Please tell me how it was legal for Biden to have classified documents in his garage.

Okay, then why were you talking about the boxes so much and saying people were “gullible” for thinking there were classified documents in them? Do you agree that Trump had classified documents in his home?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

Irrelevant. Not a defense. Ya boy is going to prison. Cry more.

Not my boy. I really don’t give a sh*t who becomes president. If Biden stays on, it’s leftists that will pay for that with increased crime, forced penalties, etc. I’ll be laughing my a&& off, just like I do every time someone on the local politics forum whines about carjackings, etc. You broke it, you bought it.

You can say it’s irrelevant all you want but you are going to find out just how relevant it is. But you do show your true political colors and I applaud you for that honestly. See you at the next Antifa rally!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Again—tell me the charges and please show me how the facts alleged do not meet the elements of the crimes. Because that’s the only way he’s getting out of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Deranged Special Prosecutah
This Jack Kent Smith
He’s deranged. And completely corrupt.
He’s so corrupt.

You had a president who was so populah,
So populah.
Probably the most populah in histry.
The most populah in histry.

And now the Deranged Special Prosecutah,
He’s conducting a witchhunt.
It’s a rigged witchhunt.
It’s completely rigged.

I can picture you. Sitting there smiling, so impressed with yourself, in your Boden dress and Birkenstocks.

Supposing we hit the body with a tremendous?
Whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light?
And then supposing you brought the light inside the body?
Which you can do either through the skin or in some other way.

Sounds in-tress-ting.
I think it sounds in-tress-ting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

The indictment says the classified information in the photo has been removed. Perhaps it's the paper with the black bar across it.

The black bar!! That tells me EVERYTHING. Dear LORD, you people are completely gullible.

Again, so are you saying Trump didn’t have classified documents even though he turned some over later? Just trying to understand your thought process here.

My thought process, again, is that Obama, Biden, Pence and Clinton had them too. But somehow that’s “OK” and “Different”

Why were you insinuating that the boxes in the pictures didn’t have classified documents then? You seemed pretty focused on that.

Not focused, laughing at those who see closed boxes and a black bar and scream AHA! Please tell me how it was legal for Biden to have classified documents in his garage.

Okay, then why were you talking about the boxes so much and saying people were “gullible” for thinking there were classified documents in them? Do you agree that Trump had classified documents in his home?

Yep. The question is whether or not it was constitutional. If not, then he should share a cell with Biden, Clinton, Obama and Pence. You seem to be unconcerned about those individuals having classified documents in their homes as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omfg please read the indictment. When you can tell me what the charges are, come back. Otherwise stop repeating nonsense you heard from Mark Levin.

Again, the indictment is from the same person who had a guilty verdict overturned unanimously by the SC. Not so good a track record there. Seems he breaks the law to prosecute.

Losing a case isn’t breaking the law

When the SC overturns your verdict because you prosecuted unconstitutionally, you broke the law.

That case wasn’t decided on constitutional grounds though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

Irrelevant. Not a defense. Ya boy is going to prison. Cry more.

Not my boy. I really don’t give a sh*t who becomes president. If Biden stays on, it’s leftists that will pay for that with increased crime, forced penalties, etc. I’ll be laughing my a&& off, just like I do every time someone on the local politics forum whines about carjackings, etc. You broke it, you bought it.

You can say it’s irrelevant all you want but you are going to find out just how relevant it is. But you do show your true political colors and I applaud you for that honestly. See you at the next Antifa rally!

Deranged word salad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.

I agree

The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.

Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.

They aren't. Biden should never have removed classified documents, given he never had to power to declassify - ever. So finding them in his garage is worse. Removing the photo from this thread is an admission of that.

I'd really encourage you to read the full indictment. The Biden "case" and this one aren't remotely similar. In fact, none of the Trump charges involve the initial removal of the classified info. They only charged what he did after the subpoena.

They never are. Again, because you seem to be too dumb to understand. Biden should NEVER have had classified documents ANYWHERE in his home. EVER.

But Trump should have? The documents were taken to his home after he was no longer president. That was okay?

He had the power to declassify. Biden never had that power as VP or as a Senator.

But he didn’t declassify. He’s on tape saying that he didn’t.

According to a transcript that CNN exclusively obtained (LOL to that) THIS is what he said:

“ As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.”

That’s not “I didn’t declassify documents”