Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are setting boundaries after opt-in is done probably to find an option with least resistance. After setting boundaries, if some people question the decision, they can say that: it's that way because your area has a high number of opt-in students which indicates that majority of students in the area wants to go to the new high school. Setting boundaries this way creates problems for the following years, although it's a politically "smart" approach.

Anonymous wrote:If I had a say, the boundaries would have been set in January and the only option would have been to opt out, but I am not. I can only speculate based on what the info that has been put out.

My only point in the opting in was that it is only meant to be this year because of how they screwed up the process. People ar eposting as if the opt in option from this year means the school will be a magnate (sp) school. It doesn’t. It is a unique option for this year.

Families at Chantilly that are not happy with the size of the school had the choice to opt in. We don’t know if they did or they did not. The SLHS PTA was told that 40-45 9th graders from SLHS opted in to Western. Those are the only numbers we have heard.

Chantilly will see kids move in 2 years when the boundaries are set.

Do I think things can shift? Yes, they have been shifting this entire time. I wish they would release the numbers, I am curious and I think it would hel with speculation. But that is me. I am guessing that we will find out how many kids opted in at the meeting in a few weeks.

It's stupid because it only takes the opinions of people with 7th and 8th graders into account. Families with younger kids may have different opinions. We bought our home specifically BECAUSE it was zoned to South Lakes. We are an international family and see the value of an IB diploma. We will be disappointed if Fox Mill is moved to Skyview. We were under the impression that because it had not been very long since they moved it to South Lakes, it would remain stable for a long time.

Many people in the neighborhood were upset when FMES was moved from Oakton to SLHS and are working to see FMES moved to Skyview.

But are those families with older children? If you moved in the past 10 years, you moved knowing what school the neighborhood is zoned to. That is why I'm saying it's not fair that families with younger children don't have a say. Many of us moved here to go to an IB school.

If parents wanted IB then you wouldn’t lose 30-50 students each year to pupil placement to AP schools and far more kids would complete the IB diploma.

Again - many of these families might have already lived in Fox Mill when the school was changed, however those of us that have moved more recently knew what we were getting into.

Dp. Many in Fox Mill want to move just like there are people in Crossfield who want to move. The "knew what we were getting into" argument applies across the board. Fox Mill is not unique.

If you want to stay at South Lakes, you should email your rep and let the board know. RIO is making their voice heard, the Fox Mill PTA tried to make theirs heard (for Skyview). You can and should speak up too, if it matters that much to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are setting boundaries after opt-in is done probably to find an option with least resistance. After setting boundaries, if some people question the decision, they can say that: it's that way because your area has a high number of opt-in students which indicates that majority of students in the area wants to go to the new high school. Setting boundaries this way creates problems for the following years, although it's a politically "smart" approach.

Anonymous wrote:If I had a say, the boundaries would have been set in January and the only option would have been to opt out, but I am not. I can only speculate based on what the info that has been put out.

My only point in the opting in was that it is only meant to be this year because of how they screwed up the process. People ar eposting as if the opt in option from this year means the school will be a magnate (sp) school. It doesn’t. It is a unique option for this year.

Families at Chantilly that are not happy with the size of the school had the choice to opt in. We don’t know if they did or they did not. The SLHS PTA was told that 40-45 9th graders from SLHS opted in to Western. Those are the only numbers we have heard.

Chantilly will see kids move in 2 years when the boundaries are set.

Do I think things can shift? Yes, they have been shifting this entire time. I wish they would release the numbers, I am curious and I think it would hel with speculation. But that is me. I am guessing that we will find out how many kids opted in at the meeting in a few weeks.

It's stupid because it only takes the opinions of people with 7th and 8th graders into account. Families with younger kids may have different opinions. We bought our home specifically BECAUSE it was zoned to South Lakes. We are an international family and see the value of an IB diploma. We will be disappointed if Fox Mill is moved to Skyview. We were under the impression that because it had not been very long since they moved it to South Lakes, it would remain stable for a long time.

Many people in the neighborhood were upset when FMES was moved from Oakton to SLHS and are working to see FMES moved to Skyview.

But are those families with older children? If you moved in the past 10 years, you moved knowing what school the neighborhood is zoned to. That is why I'm saying it's not fair that families with younger children don't have a say. Many of us moved here to go to an IB school.

If parents wanted IB then you wouldn’t lose 30-50 students each year to pupil placement to AP schools and far more kids would complete the IB diploma.

Again - many of these families might have already lived in Fox Mill when the school was changed, however those of us that have moved more recently knew what we were getting into.

Dp. Many in Fox Mill want to move just like there are people in Crossfield who want to move. The "knew what we were getting into" argument applies across the board. Fox Mill is not unique.

If you want to stay at South Lakes, you should email your rep and let the board know. RIO is making their voice heard, the Fox Mill PTA tried to make theirs heard (for Skyview). You can and should speak up too, if it matters that much to you.

I don't think any PTAs/PTOs should be claiming to represent the whole school in front of the school board or at Gatehouse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are setting boundaries after opt-in is done probably to find an option with least resistance. After setting boundaries, if some people question the decision, they can say that: it's that way because your area has a high number of opt-in students which indicates that majority of students in the area wants to go to the new high school. Setting boundaries this way creates problems for the following years, although it's a politically "smart" approach.

Anonymous wrote:If I had a say, the boundaries would have been set in January and the only option would have been to opt out, but I am not. I can only speculate based on what the info that has been put out.

My only point in the opting in was that it is only meant to be this year because of how they screwed up the process. People ar eposting as if the opt in option from this year means the school will be a magnate (sp) school. It doesn’t. It is a unique option for this year.

Families at Chantilly that are not happy with the size of the school had the choice to opt in. We don’t know if they did or they did not. The SLHS PTA was told that 40-45 9th graders from SLHS opted in to Western. Those are the only numbers we have heard.

Chantilly will see kids move in 2 years when the boundaries are set.

Do I think things can shift? Yes, they have been shifting this entire time. I wish they would release the numbers, I am curious and I think it would hel with speculation. But that is me. I am guessing that we will find out how many kids opted in at the meeting in a few weeks.

It's stupid because it only takes the opinions of people with 7th and 8th graders into account. Families with younger kids may have different opinions. We bought our home specifically BECAUSE it was zoned to South Lakes. We are an international family and see the value of an IB diploma. We will be disappointed if Fox Mill is moved to Skyview. We were under the impression that because it had not been very long since they moved it to South Lakes, it would remain stable for a long time.

Many people in the neighborhood were upset when FMES was moved from Oakton to SLHS and are working to see FMES moved to Skyview.

But are those families with older children? If you moved in the past 10 years, you moved knowing what school the neighborhood is zoned to. That is why I'm saying it's not fair that families with younger children don't have a say. Many of us moved here to go to an IB school.

If parents wanted IB then you wouldn’t lose 30-50 students each year to pupil placement to AP schools and far more kids would complete the IB diploma.

Again - many of these families might have already lived in Fox Mill when the school was changed, however those of us that have moved more recently knew what we were getting into.

Dp. Many in Fox Mill want to move just like there are people in Crossfield who want to move. The "knew what we were getting into" argument applies across the board. Fox Mill is not unique.

If you want to stay at South Lakes, you should email your rep and let the board know. RIO is making their voice heard, the Fox Mill PTA tried to make theirs heard (for Skyview). You can and should speak up too, if it matters that much to you.

I don't think any PTAs/PTOs should be claiming to represent the whole school in front of the school board or at Gatehouse.

Fox Mill’s PTA has not taken a stance on the potential change, at least not that I know of. They have been trying to meet with Meren to discuss the change and she has cancelled meetings and then not been available. I don’t believe the PTA is trying to push a position but understand what is happening and give parents a place to talk to their Board member. Meren has chosen to not engage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Where are you getting that Navy wants to go to Fairfax high school? I am a Navy parent and would love if we got moved back to Chantilly. But I suspect most parents, especially the ones that live on the eastern end of the Navy boundary, would rather stay at Oakton.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

They have yet to move anyone out of Chantilly--in fact, they just put more in.

Remember, we do not know who is going to the new school and will not know until summer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are setting boundaries after opt-in is done probably to find an option with least resistance. After setting boundaries, if some people question the decision, they can say that: it's that way because your area has a high number of opt-in students which indicates that majority of students in the area wants to go to the new high school. Setting boundaries this way creates problems for the following years, although it's a politically "smart" approach.

Anonymous wrote:If I had a say, the boundaries would have been set in January and the only option would have been to opt out, but I am not. I can only speculate based on what the info that has been put out.

My only point in the opting in was that it is only meant to be this year because of how they screwed up the process. People ar eposting as if the opt in option from this year means the school will be a magnate (sp) school. It doesn’t. It is a unique option for this year.

Families at Chantilly that are not happy with the size of the school had the choice to opt in. We don’t know if they did or they did not. The SLHS PTA was told that 40-45 9th graders from SLHS opted in to Western. Those are the only numbers we have heard.

Chantilly will see kids move in 2 years when the boundaries are set.

Do I think things can shift? Yes, they have been shifting this entire time. I wish they would release the numbers, I am curious and I think it would hel with speculation. But that is me. I am guessing that we will find out how many kids opted in at the meeting in a few weeks.

It's stupid because it only takes the opinions of people with 7th and 8th graders into account. Families with younger kids may have different opinions. We bought our home specifically BECAUSE it was zoned to South Lakes. We are an international family and see the value of an IB diploma. We will be disappointed if Fox Mill is moved to Skyview. We were under the impression that because it had not been very long since they moved it to South Lakes, it would remain stable for a long time.

Many people in the neighborhood were upset when FMES was moved from Oakton to SLHS and are working to see FMES moved to Skyview.

But are those families with older children? If you moved in the past 10 years, you moved knowing what school the neighborhood is zoned to. That is why I'm saying it's not fair that families with younger children don't have a say. Many of us moved here to go to an IB school.

If parents wanted IB then you wouldn’t lose 30-50 students each year to pupil placement to AP schools and far more kids would complete the IB diploma.

Again - many of these families might have already lived in Fox Mill when the school was changed, however those of us that have moved more recently knew what we were getting into.

Dp. Many in Fox Mill want to move just like there are people in Crossfield who want to move. The "knew what we were getting into" argument applies across the board. Fox Mill is not unique.

If you want to stay at South Lakes, you should email your rep and let the board know. RIO is making their voice heard, the Fox Mill PTA tried to make theirs heard (for Skyview). You can and should speak up too, if it matters that much to you.

I don't think any PTAs/PTOs should be claiming to represent the whole school in front of the school board or at Gatehouse.

Fox Mill’s PTA has not taken a stance on the potential change, at least not that I know of. They have been trying to meet with Meren to discuss the change and she has cancelled meetings and then not been available. I don’t believe the PTA is trying to push a position but understand what is happening and give parents a place to talk to their Board member. Meren has chosen to not engage.

They should reach out to the at large board members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

Absolutely not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

Absolutely not.

Speak for yourself. I am a Navy parent who would much prefer Chantilly to Oakton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

Absolutely not.

Speak for yourself. I am a Navy parent who would much prefer Chantilly to Oakton.

Me too, I really want overcrowding, modular spaces and a 30+ year old renovation at Chantilly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

Absolutely not.

Speak for yourself. I am a Navy parent who would much prefer Chantilly to Oakton.

Me too, I really want overcrowding, modular spaces and a 30+ year old renovation at Chantilly.

Actually, if FCPS chose not to lay a finger on Madison, West Potomac, and Justice, Chantilly could have received an addition over its academy wing. Doors 3, 5, and 6 would gain stairwells.

They could have also built an addition above the gym hallway, where Door 10 gains a stair.

[Anonymous]

I just hope they keep it geographical because the name of the school intimates it will be a magnet, which the community doesn’t want at all.

If Reid and her cronies spins it that way in the event they backtrack, we must rise together and sue them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will provide an important data point in the decision making. For example, it's going to be a useful data point in deciding moving crossfield or foxmil. That data won't affect Oakhill.

Anonymous wrote:The boundary decisions are not being made solely on opt-in numbers. That's DCUM speculation.

Gee. Why didn't they do the boundary study based on those who want to Opt-in to any school?

I do not understand this process at all.

Reid is clueless.

With how few changes they made in the grand scheme it sort of feels like that’s what they did.

I'd be very surprised if Meren supports South Lakes losing Fox Mill.

Meren doesn’t know the difference between Fox Mill and Fox Mill Woods.

I’d love to lose Meren.

If Reid’s proposal sends Fox Mill to Skyview the other board members will pass it.

Crossfield to Skyview makes so much more sense that I don't think even one board member would object if that were Reid's proposal.

What I find crazy is how Navy families are so involved in this. They are worried that if Crossfield is moved to a closer school, that they will be moved to Fairfax, which is closer to them.

And Waples Mill is also closer to Fairfax. If you look at that petition floating around you’ll see there is heavy support from both them and Navy probably for the reason you’ve suggested

I am a Navy parent, I know for a fact this is true.

Navy wants to go to fairfax.

Well say for example FCPS zones part of brookfield out of Chantilly, they would have some room for Navy as the Modular unit would still provide that.

Absolutely not.

Speak for yourself. I am a Navy parent who would much prefer Chantilly to Oakton.

The absolutely not was in response to someone saying that Navy families want to go to Fairfax High School.

[Anonymous]

Is there any possibility that we will get boundaries out of them before June?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility that we will get boundaries out of them before June?

I mean, sure, there is always a chance but realistically, no.

They have to come up with their plan, present their plan, allow discussion, make changes to their plan, allow discussion, finalize the plan, and vote on the plan. Maybe it goes a bit faster because of the smaller number of schools involved but I expect them to use every day that they have.